Jakey53
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2011
- 30,693
- 9,553
Two heads have already rolled out of town.Heads need to roll. Then we can move on.
Two heads have already rolled out of town.Heads need to roll. Then we can move on.
How long did the current ownership have control of the team when this all went down?
All the more reason this is excessive bullshit. I really don't understand the NHLs logic here considering the circumstance with the ownership transitioning in and the guy that had the most hockey ops power walking away escaping punishment.Not long. Start of the 19-20 season.
The Coyotes cheated, the Coyotes got sanctioned. Stop trying to blame anyone else.All the more reason this is excessive bullshit. I really don't understand the NHLs logic here considering the circumstance with the ownership transitioning in and the guy that had the most hockey ops power walking away escaping punishment.
As a Husker fan, I very much miss the 90's.I'm the same, and I was trying to figure out why I'm such a sucker...and I think I figured it out.
I've been through this before.
I survived the multiple probations of the Florida Gators in 85,86, and 90, Charley Pell and Galen Hall era. Had to vacate/not claim our first and second SEC titles (which we'd never won before then)....it sucked. And we were threatened with the SMU-style death penalty when the basketball team cheated too....and out of all that came Steve Spurrier and the (annoyingly, to some) dominant teams of the 90s. Plus the Urban Meyer/Tim Tebow years and the Billy Donovan/B2B title years...
Will that happen with the Coyotes? Probably not. But it's why I'll just shrug at those who leave.
No, the punishment is way too severe, no way 1st round picks should be involved, that pick could end up in the top 5. Hit those involved with hefty fines and if you have to take picks then take a second and a third.The Coyotes cheated, the Coyotes got sanctioned. Stop trying to blame anyone else.
I agree, but do we know the whole story. We can piss and moan all we want but it will not change a damn thing. Turn the page and forget about it.
2nds and 3rds are the punishment you get for mentioning someone else's player or filing an improper contract. The League went easy by leaving out the monetary punishment. The NHL has always been hard on cheaters.No, the punishment is way too severe, no way 1st round picks should be involved, that pick could end up in the top 5. Hit those involved with hefty fines and if you have to take picks then take a second and a third.
The league talks out of both sides of its mouth, just look at the reffing and suspensions for exhibits A & B.2nds and 3rds are the punishment you get for mentioning someone else's player or filing an improper contract. The League went easy by leaving out the monetary punishment. The NHL has always been hard on cheaters.
And finally, I have to think Meruelo is going to have a lot to say to Bettman about the involvement of the Devils with his GM.
I think this is why he isn't saying anything. He's going to wait to see what Bettman rules on that first.
“While I conclude that certain club personnel acted in a grossly negligent manner at best, which was conceded by the club, I ultimately conclude that the record does not establish — to a standard with which I am comfortable — that those individuals engaged in intentional wrongdoing, as opposed to grossly negligent behavior.”
So this wasn't an accident, or a lack of knowledge of the policy among the scouts. This was a deliberate and calculated attempt to exploit what might have been interpreted as grey areas of the policy.
the record does not establish
to a standard with which I am not comfortable.