BB79
🇺🇲
- Apr 30, 2011
- 6,277
- 7,615
I follow both teams. Only sport where I've ever followed 2 teams in the same divisionWait, are you a Bruins fan? Haha dear lord, you know it’s bad for the Sabres when we’re getting sympathy spots.
I follow both teams. Only sport where I've ever followed 2 teams in the same divisionWait, are you a Bruins fan? Haha dear lord, you know it’s bad for the Sabres when we’re getting sympathy spots.
Hey, why not Babcock?Q is back and ready to coach and I think he'd be a great addition to turn this team around.
Teams with scoring don't normally trade those guys for lesser or non-scorers. Other GMs aren't really motivated to solve your problems.A trade or two to add some scoring help wouldn't hurt either.
The roster still has significant deficiencies and Sacco was notoriously bad when he was a head coach in Colorado. But I'd have to think that a change would at least loosen the team up and that guys like Pastrnak, Lindholm, and McAvoy wouldn't be underperforming so much.Would Sacoo taking over change much?
Keefe has connections, I think it's legit
Monty gone, Sacco taking over
Hey, why not Babcock?
Teams with scoring don't normally trade those guys for lesser or non-scorers. Other GMs aren't really motivated to solve your problems.
The team leadership is not what it used to be under Chara and Bergeron. A new coach will only do so much but they traded scoring depth and vets that cared and would show pride.We can expect a new coach bump. But who knows what they look like by March.
Guess the "real media" need to fess up to their inability to actually report news. LOL.Whoops.
Basically, it can go one of two ways, either it jolts the team to wake up and reach their potential or they bottom out and get a high draft pick. And either one is preferable to the status quo.
Guess the "real media" need to fess up to their inability to actually report news. LOL.