OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Part III

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
NYC climbing the leaderboard

dLi2cKv.jpg
 
China also had the virus running rampant for an unknown period of time. It seems plausible that we shouldn't be much different.
The death toll from an outbreak of coronavirus in Italy has grown by 743 to 6,820, the head of the Civil Protection Agency said on Tuesday, reversing a decline in fatalities seen over the last two days.
On Monday 602 people died. That followed 650 deaths on Sunday and 793 on Saturday -- the highest daily figure since the contagion came to light on Feb. 21.
The total number of confirmed cases in Italy rose to 69,176 from a previous 63,927, an increase of 8.2%, in line with Monday's growth rate, the Civil Protection Agency said. —Reuters
I'm guessing that this increase is coming due to the spread caused by people fleeing the north of Italy to the south when they learned of the impending lockdowns.

Unfortunately things are about to get a lot worse in the south of Italy given that we're about two weeks out from when that exodus began, though hopefully the relatively quick lockdown of the rest of the country happened quick enough that the spike won't be too large for the rest of the country to handle.
 
China also had the virus running rampant for an unknown period of time. It seems plausible that we shouldn't be much different.

Here's a NYT article that goes into the lengths the Chinese are going into to slow the virus. I think we could all agree that many of their actions wouldn't go over well in this country. Article also has health experts making some other really good points. It's a good read for those who haven't seen it:

The Virus Can Be Stopped, but Only With Harsh Steps, Experts Say

Considering there are so many asymptomatic cases (estimated from anywhere from 7 to 1 to 11 to 1), I believe the mortality rate is going to be around 0.2% to 0.3%. When all this is said & done I think researchers will be amazed at how much this virus spread through non-traditional means

I think it can't be stressed enough that we cannot only look at the mortality rate of this viral outbreak to determine the damage (and I figure you know this). Of course as more people are tested that have light symptoms or are asymptomatic, the percentage will go down. Once all the analysis has been done and good statistical modeling is created (like exists for the flu and other viruses) we'll zero in on a more accurate rate.

An unchecked spread of this virus leading to the overrun of admittance into hospital will have a three-fold effect: One, people will die from COVID-19 only because there wasn't enough equipment/personnel available to give them adequate care. Two, health care worker illnesses will put even more of a strain on the system leading to more lost lives. Three, there will be those being admitted into hospitals for other illnesses that will die when in normal circumstances they could have recovered. Yes, that 70 woman who goes into the hospital with moderate influenza ends up dying because they are saving the lives of the ten 40-60 year olds that came in with COVID-19. She doesn't go down in the books as someone who died from COVID-19 but somebody is still burying their wife/mother/sister because of it.

The other thing that won't show up in the mortality rate is those that survive but end up having long term effects from the virus. At this time we don't know the full extent but scarring on lungs from the virus attacking them has been seen. Economic and social fallout from this will be felt for decades just like below.

I can guess that plenty of us knew people who died on 9-11 from the terrorist attacks. Some of us know just as many or more people who have died or who are terminally sick with cancer/another illness derived from that day.
 
Meant this as a reply to Bobbop but blew it...

In any discussion here that attempts to separate fact from fiction and help keep clear what is safe and prudent from what is not, it will prove difficult not to allow politics to intrude entirely as our directives, and most information... and misinformation/disinformation... is coming to us through elected officials. People are going to have thoughts about that. You're always a sensible guy here... I expect you must be able to see that. So far I think a respectful tone has mostly been the case.
 
Meant this as a reply to Bobbop but blew it...

In any discussion here that attempts to separate fact from fiction and help keep clear what is safe and prudent from what is not,
it will prove difficult not to allow politics to intrude entirely as our directives, and most information... and misinformation/disinformation... is coming to us through elected officials. People are going to have thoughts about that. You're always a sensible guy here... I expect you must be able to see that. So far I think a respectful tone has mostly been the case.

This, along with many things, is in the eye of the beholder. Within the context of politics and day to day discussions of politics, facts are often nothing more than an opinion with a biased news source cited as a reference. The amount of misinformation coming from an elected official usually depends on which side of the coin you're on. Most aren't self aware enough to see their own inherent biases and it is what makes these discussions, even tightly moderated, often turn highly politicized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barnaby
This, along with many things, is in the eye of the beholder. Within the context of politics and day to day discussions of politics, facts are often nothing more than an opinion with a biased news source cited as a reference. The amount of misinformation coming from an elected official usually depends on which side of the coin you're on. Most aren't self aware enough to see their own inherent biases.
I strongly disagree with this statement. Facts are facts.

Yes, politics is subject to spin. But the fact (see what I did there? ;)) that certain people in this government speak "alternative facts" with such abandon is a real problem and part of why we are where we are. Journalists' (and consequently, the public's) instinct to "both sides" in the current environment has done enormous damage, because on one side you've got ten tons of misinformation and on the other just the "usual" few pounds.

The whole situation with Dr. Fauci demonstrates this point to a T.
 
Last edited:
Would it be better if I said "temporary monthly payments" instead of UBI? I just used the shorthand of the day for convenience.

Though, I should point out that your implied reaction – which reads negative – goes precisely to my point about doing things a certain segment finds distasteful.

I thought it was obvious by my post, but to be clear, by no means am I suggesting that these measures need – or should – be permanent. (Personally, though I am generally progressive in my views, I am uncertain as to the effectiveness of a UBI; truthfully, I haven't really investigated the arguments because I thought that it was an unrealistic proposal in the political environment of 2019.)

But by the same token, I can see how if such measures were successful, they might impact subsequent political conversations.

Of course, I'm sure I don't need to tell you how I would react to anyone suggesting I should risk the safety of my 72-y-o mother who just recovered from pneumonia 3 months ago, simply because they don't want to risk the possibility that a permanent UBI might become a popular platform in subsequent elections 2 to 4 years down the line...
Perhaps you should have said "freedom dividend," apparently that works best with the audience you're trying to reach according to Andrew Yang. (Only half joking...)

I would be considered politically moderate in most of the world, which probably makes me a left-wing radical commie liberal given the Overton Window in this country. I also am not convinced of the viability of permanent UBI for many reasons (even though many studies and even the current pilot programs suggest it's not only viable but highly successful), but if there ever was a time to stay home and receive a check for the good of the country, now is the time.

How much are hundreds of thousands of lives worth? What percentage of our income are we willing to forego through taxation to give us a few months of relief for individuals and small businesses so as not to put these lives at risk, and potentially cause even more economic devastation through the medical crisis that would arise?

Sadly, the mindset you're describing reminds me of this particular trolley problem (even more appropriate than the one I posted earlier):
2020-03-24.jpg
 
Am I wrong to be pessimistic that the relief bill that is supposedly on the 2-yard-line of being signed today won't make it through this week?

I'm fortunate enough to keep my paycheck, but my mother is out of work indefinitely. My sister got laid off last week. I don't know how they're going to keep their head above water if this goes on through the summer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lias Andersson
Meant this as a reply to Bobbop but blew it...

In any discussion here that attempts to separate fact from fiction and help keep clear what is safe and prudent from what is not, it will prove difficult not to allow politics to intrude entirely as our directives, and most information... and misinformation/disinformation... is coming to us through elected officials. People are going to have thoughts about that. You're always a sensible guy here... I expect you must be able to see that. So far I think a respectful tone has mostly been the case.
I appreciate your message and I get it. Facts are stubborn things. I was specifically referring to 1-2 posters who have a real propensity to pontificate on one set of facts. Hats off to the mods for managing this process.

I read this thread but mostly refrain from posting because I don't want to be dragged into what seems to be an inevitable conflict. I prefer hockey arguments.

Apropos of nothing -- my wife is a retired nurse who still holds a inactive New York state nursing license. (she hasn't lived or worked in NY for 40 years) She got an email yesterday from Governor Cuomo inviting her to come back to work. I give Cuomo credit, he is taking great initiative.
 
One of my students and his family got it.

I haven't seen him since March 3rd so I'm in the clear, but it still feels completely different when it's someone in your life :(

My sister in-law was tested yesterday. If she has it, my wife's entire family is at risk. My wife is absolutely petrified and I kind of am too...

It makes it real when it breaches your own world. I wish nothing but the best for your student and his family.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad