Value of: Connor Murphy 50% retained

Jared Dunn

Registered User
Dec 23, 2013
8,909
3,489
Yellowknife
Even with retention I have a hard time seeing him being worth more than a 2nd which doesn't necessarily feel worth it for two years of retention
 

Perratrooper

Registered User
May 26, 2016
5,678
4,311
Alberta
Colorado can’t offer a first for protection reasons, but I would imagine they’d be happy to give up two seconds or the equivalent of that gets it done? Maybe something along the lines of:

To Chi
NYR 2nd+Ludvig+Prospect

To Col:
Murphy (50% retained)
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,330
29,523
Feels like Jake McCabe trade all over again, but I think McCabe is better. I could see 2 2nds which for the Hawks, IDK if that makes any sense to do that. They have more than enough picks.
 

razor ray

Registered User
May 8, 2011
1,604
1,746
I believe his has a NTC. If he has a clean bill of health at 2.2 mill x 2 years for a top 4 Dman I would have to imagine a first. Chi would probably take a small dump contract back.
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
294
463
Murphy (50%) + Soderblom for Sam O'Reilly, STL 2nd, Dermott or Stecher (cap), and a 4th to a third team for retaining another 50% on Murphy?
 
Last edited:

TheNewEra

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
8,202
3,606
a first seems like too much even with retention but a second seems like too little

2nd round pick+jbd+one of daoust/crookshank/bourgault

murphy would replace jbd but at the same time jbd has actually been playing well this year, the coaching staff are in love with veterans so this might be the way to get hamonic to sit lol (main reason for the move) but for chicagos end jbd is a third pairing nhler with a little more upside (At max a #4 dman imo) and the additional piece are nhl/ahl tweeners who are more of a lottery ticket (i think the best option would be crookshank but it would depend on style and what position is needed)

i think the colorado offer above is slightly better
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad