Luigi Lemieux
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2003
- 22,240
- 10,906
I think there was some hype fatigue for Celebrini since he was right after Bedard, and Bedard while solid didn't exactly light the world on fire. So hype was more muted for Celebrini if even Bedard struggled (relative to hype).The timing for these comparisons are a little unfair in that Bedard is slumping and Celebrini is playing out of his mind––recency bias will always creep into these discussions in unavoidable ways.
But I do think these conversations and comparisons should be less of a knock on Bedard (who is a very special talent) and more of a knock on the lack of hype around Celebrini. It should have been obvious what kind of an exceptional prospect Celebrini was, yet a good number of people around here and in the media seemed to think he was more of a middle-of-the-road first overall.
OV scored 52 goals and 106 points as a rookie with no Backstrom.Ovechkin without Backstrom isn't that great.
He trending for another 60 pts season just like last year, so purely from an analytic perspective, he pretty stable. I don't think he currently slumping hard, that just a reflexion of what he is as a player with some room to growHe just won rookie of the year with one of the best D+1 scoring seasons in recent memory. His struggles right now aren't 3 points in 15 games. He's a proven top 6 scorer in the NHL and is only 19 years old. Hard to believe he won't be scoring 100+ points and 40+ goals during his prime, if not sooner.
Are you saying that Backstrom didn't help Ovechkin at all.OV scored 52 goals and 106 points as a rookie with no Backstrom.
Ovechkin made Backstrom
Moving the goalposts? You said that Ovechkin without Backstrom "isn't that great."Are you saying that Backstrom didn't help Ovechkin at all.
people these days...
Barkov without Reinhart isn't as that greatMoving the goalposts? You said that Ovechkin without Backstrom "isn't that great."
Ovechkin rookie season team top scorers:
1. Ovechkin 52g 54a 106p
2. Zubrus 23g 34a 57p
3. Halpern 11g 33a 44p
Those were the top 3 on Caps for scoring. Did he need Backstrom?
OV scored 52 goals and 106 points as a rookie with no Backstrom.
Ovechkin made Backstrom
No one is disputing that Backstrom’s playmaking obviously helped Ovechkin increase his production. He’s referring Ovechkin’s 2005-2006 season where he notched 52G & 106 points WITHOUT Backstrom. Pretty good for someone who “isn’t that great without Backstrom”.Are you saying that Backstrom didn't help Ovechkin at all.
people these days...