Connor Bedard Vs. Macklin Celebrini

Who will have the better career?


  • Total voters
    132

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,240
10,906
Still need to see more of Celebrini but he's been so impressive so far. Expect he'll be the better two way player, so the question is how much better will Bedard be offensively? If at all...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helistin

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,240
10,906
The timing for these comparisons are a little unfair in that Bedard is slumping and Celebrini is playing out of his mind––recency bias will always creep into these discussions in unavoidable ways.

But I do think these conversations and comparisons should be less of a knock on Bedard (who is a very special talent) and more of a knock on the lack of hype around Celebrini. It should have been obvious what kind of an exceptional prospect Celebrini was, yet a good number of people around here and in the media seemed to think he was more of a middle-of-the-road first overall.
I think there was some hype fatigue for Celebrini since he was right after Bedard, and Bedard while solid didn't exactly light the world on fire. So hype was more muted for Celebrini if even Bedard struggled (relative to hype).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 67 others

GrumpyKoala

Registered User
Aug 11, 2020
3,651
3,909
He just won rookie of the year with one of the best D+1 scoring seasons in recent memory. His struggles right now aren't 3 points in 15 games. He's a proven top 6 scorer in the NHL and is only 19 years old. Hard to believe he won't be scoring 100+ points and 40+ goals during his prime, if not sooner.
He trending for another 60 pts season just like last year, so purely from an analytic perspective, he pretty stable. I don't think he currently slumping hard, that just a reflexion of what he is as a player with some room to grow

The gap between 60pts and 100 is huge. 80 players did 60+ last year and only 9 made it to 100.
Now I am not debating if he can, maybe, but the current indicators are not also like its a given.

Same things for goals. Not everyone with talent get a 40 goal season, Only 15 players did that last year.

I don't see a trend where people generally underrate him, if anything I see a lot of people hyping the unrealized potential he as, extrapolating on how good at a point in the future he would be.
 

gary559

Registered User
Oct 28, 2023
30
35
I think the draft hype and playing in a bigger market has put a lot of pressure on Bedard, Celebrini is in the opposite situation where didn't get nearly the hype and playing in an empty building. I think San Jose is a favorable situation and if the players were swapped teams you would see Bedard playing a lot better.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,285
16,523
Are you saying that Backstrom didn't help Ovechkin at all.


people these days...:rolleyes:
Moving the goalposts? You said that Ovechkin without Backstrom "isn't that great."

Ovechkin rookie season team top scorers:

1. Ovechkin 52g 54a 106p
2. Zubrus 23g 34a 57p
3. Halpern 11g 33a 44p

Those were the top 3 on Caps for scoring. Did he need Backstrom?
 

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
10,050
14,941
Alberta
Moving the goalposts? You said that Ovechkin without Backstrom "isn't that great."

Ovechkin rookie season team top scorers:

1. Ovechkin 52g 54a 106p
2. Zubrus 23g 34a 57p
3. Halpern 11g 33a 44p

Those were the top 3 on Caps for scoring. Did he need Backstrom?
Barkov without Reinhart isn't as that great
Kane without Toews isn't as great
Ovechkin without Backstrom Isn't that great.

which is the higher %

That I felt like dunking Ovechkin or that I accidently put the wrong word there?


:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,794
13,818
Bedard had a NASTY snipe tonight. Hopefully this means he’s snapped out of his slump and will start being the player the whole world knows he can be.
 

TheLegend27

Registered User
May 11, 2024
13
19
Seattle
Are you saying that Backstrom didn't help Ovechkin at all.


people these days...:rolleyes:
No one is disputing that Backstrom’s playmaking obviously helped Ovechkin increase his production. He’s referring Ovechkin’s 2005-2006 season where he notched 52G & 106 points WITHOUT Backstrom. Pretty good for someone who “isn’t that great without Backstrom”.

There’s a huge difference between “isn’t as great” and “isn’t that great”. I’d agree if you made a typo and actually meant “isn’t as great”.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad