Calm down. He aint gonna be Yakupov..He doesn't have a point when he says Stankoven will be better or compares Bedard to Yakupov. When someone's post uses those types of comparisons/examples to prove the point they're trying to make, then they don't have a point.
I'm pretty calm. I'm not the one spamming this thread with over the top posts because I'm angry that Bedard's getting a lot of hype.Calm down. He aint gonna be Yakupov..
They did the same thing for the guy in your profile pic, and still haven't stopped lol. As much love as the kid will get from TSN, Pierre McGuire and a legion of fans....there will always be those same people, hating him for simply being good and getting attention. Nothing draws a crowd like a crowd, good or bad.I'm pretty calm. I'm not the one spamming this thread with over the top posts because I'm angry that Bedard's getting a lot of hype.
Bedard was incredible against lesser teams but much less so against the U.S. and the Czechs. This should give everyone pause as to his ultimate upside in the NHL where the opposition he will be facing each night will be more U.S. / Czech than Austria/Germany. Once again one should be cautious, if not wary, of the prevailing consensus.
"Bedard's too small to dominate the NHL and to play center" like holy f*** guys did we not go through this shit literally just a few years ago with Hughes?
Also using other guys that have dominated the WJC and didn't amount to much and comparing them to Bedard is dumb. Almost all of those players were doing that in their D+1 and D+2's as 18 and 19 year olds. Bedard is 17 and still closer to his 17th birthday than his 18th.
Eberle didn't look like he would be a a lock to be an elite point producer in the NHL unless you were only stat watching.He’s incredible but this is the world juniors, not the NHL. Eberle looked like a lock to be an elite point producer during his run too. His size will hurt him. He also tries to do too much and has looked bad in his own end or on turnovers.
How good was Forsberg at 17?Bedard sucked against better competition. Peter Forsberg was much better.
Nobodies floor is a ”franchise player”, no matter how well they do prior to stepping in to the league.His floor is a franchise player, his ceiling is generational superstar. What he's accomplished as a 17 year old is unprecedented. When we look back in a decade we'll see how Canada won b2b golds at the world juniors and it will mainly be attributed to how we had Bedard for both those years and how unfair it was.
All that watching and you still write this terrible opinion lolStankoven is listed as 5'7", but a deep dive on him led me to believe he is really 5'6".
Bedard is listed as 5'10". Now anyone with a pair of eyes can tell you he is an inch taller than Stankoven. He isn't anywhere near 5'10". He looks tiny on the ice.
He doesn't move like Stankoven either. Guys their size make it in the NHL if they can move like Stankoven can. Speedy, agile. Enough speed to burn defenders wide.
Bedard can not beat anyone wide. Czech's easily pushed him into the boards every time he skates up the ice with the puck. He feasted on relegation teams with players who will never sniff the NHL. Won't even sniff any of the top international leagues either.
He is crafty. He has an amazing shot. Reminds me of Yakupov. They play similarly, with Bedard being a significantly better passer and Yakupov having the faster feet.
Two small, stocky guys. Bedard being significantly smaller.
Unless he can start skating like Stankoven, he is going to be like a litany of other players who were able to dominate junior hockey due to a specific skillset that doesn't translate to the NHL whatsoever.
Nobody as small and as slow as him is making an impact at the NHL level. The Czech junior team that may have 2-3 NHL bound players on it was able to skate with him and turn him into a nothing player when the going got tough.
I like his game, don't think I'm slandering him for no good reason. I've watched all his hilites 10x over to see that incredible shot of his. I don't see how you can watch this tournament, at least the games against real opposition, and think he is anywhere near becoming a superstar level player. He isn't even in the Eichel/Matthews tier of player for my money. Not big, fast, or strong enough to ever get there.
I truly believe Stankoven has more potential to end up as a good player in the show.
I disagree, Ovi was a great player back then and still is but most seasons averaged around a point per game, had a few really good seasons and a few less than a point per game seasons. Again, great stats especially consistently over 18 seasons but not considered in the generational talent category 10 years ago. Tons of guys that have produced the same but Ovi has done it his entire career and continues to which is basically what I said in the first place.Yeah, we were. There are probably 1000 conversations about this from back in the day.
Size hasn’t stopped great players from being great.
Nobodies floor is a ”franchise player”, no matter how well they do prior to stepping in to the league.
That literally means there is 0% chance he does worse than a franchise player.
Even that’s more of a realistic prediction.Ok, his floor is high school hockey coach/beer league superstar.
He's 17. I agree he stays out too long, is lazy getting back and not great defensively. But he's the most talented 17 year old we've seen in a long time.He’s incredible but this is the world juniors, not the NHL. Eberle looked like a lock to be an elite point producer during his run too. His size will hurt him. He also tries to do too much and has looked bad in his own end or on turnovers.