Right, because being ‘bigger and tougher’ would have prevented Malkin going knee on knee with Tinordi unexpectedly, or Blueger from getting a cross check in the neck.
The argument for getting more physical (not necessarily bigger) isn't that it'd prevent those things, it'd be that we're dishing that out over a 7 game series when that can tilt the tables, especially with the lack of whistles. It's not a preventative measure.
As for being undersized, who knows. But we do have an unusually large amount of injuries year after year so something's up, whatever it is.
You need guys that can play well in either case, and that's a lot easier said than done. Physical players who are worth a damn are pretty rare, and pretty expensive. You have to develop those guys, imo.
The one thing I think we're sorely missing, from a role standpoint, is a pest.
WHY CANT WE HAVE NICE THINGS!!!
I just don't think it's a coincidence we have this happen Every.Single.Year without fail, not possible so something is wrong somewhere.The argument for getting more physical (not necessarily bigger) isn't that it'd prevent those things, it'd be that we're dishing that out over a 7 game series when that can tilt the tables, especially with the lack of whistles. It's not a preventative measure.
As for being undersized, who knows. But we do have an unusually large amount of injuries year after year so something's up, whatever it is.
The one thing I think we're sorely missing, from a role standpoint, is a pest.
There's still no update on Geno?? I'm guessing if it was serious we'd know by now. Hopefully he's back next game or soon!
I just don't think it's a coincidence we have this happen Every.Single.Year without fail, not possible so something is wrong somewhere.
It's a waste is what it is. If you think this team has any serious shot, pass me whatever you're drinking smoking or eating.Don't really see how that's a negative though, unless he costs a lot to trade for.
He's a lazy Russian.Honestly wondering, what is it about Malkin that causes him to get injured so often? It seems like any semi-stiff bump results in him suffering some relatively major injury.
Does he have too much of "Eric Lindros" syndrome in him where he doesn't really bother to brace himself for hits or just lowers his head without paying attention to what's coming, or what?
Honestly wondering, what is it about Malkin that causes him to get injured so often? It seems like any semi-stiff bump results in him suffering some relatively major injury.
Does he have too much of "Eric Lindros" syndrome in him where he doesn't really bother to brace himself for hits or just lowers his head without paying attention to what's coming, or what?
Honestly wondering, what is it about Malkin that causes him to get injured so often? It seems like any semi-stiff bump results in him suffering some relatively major injury.
Does he have too much of "Eric Lindros" syndrome in him where he doesn't really bother to brace himself for hits or just lowers his head without paying attention to what's coming, or what?
Speed is always going to be king but speed and size and physicality is a much better thing as well as 2 way play. Why not have it all if you can?I agree it seems more than random chance, just not that it's due to our guys being small or weak. If you look at the injuries to our stars, they've mostly been pretty catastrophic plays. But in my opinion, discounting factors like conditioning trainers (we have no way of knowing how good they are), it comes down to the intensity and style we play. Dan Bylsma and MS both demand a very intense and fast style, with a lot of shot blocking and gritty play. Our stars play along the boards and in front of the net in a way that others just don't, at least not as often. There's just a different intensity to how we are expected to play. And our guys are targets. The hacking and whacking and hits accumulate, little stuff you can't see behind the play. Not just the stars but other guys too. Size and physicality won't stop that.
Not saying I don't want to get a Kunitz type player who can punish the opposition in a 7 game series, but getting bigger and tougher? Why? We've won 3 Cups playing the way we have. You can't argue with the results but the price is high. Is the league really moving towards bigger and tougher? I don't think it is. Speed (thinking and skating) still rules.
This is the stupid part, he completely braced for that hit only to get kneed in such unfortunate way.I guess I'd argue the premise. Just off the top of my head, of the injuries he's had over the years I can't think of any that were 'semi-stiff bumps.' Shoulder injuries all happened on major hits (or Leclair losing his balance and Malkin doing a cartwheel over him), ACL/MCL injury was a 6ft 8 lanky bastard who lost his balance and caved in Malkin's knee, concussion was a pretty dangerous push into the boards at high speed, his injury last year he ran into Letang and fell straining something in his leg, his elbow ligament tear was off a catastrophic impact from Prout backing into his arm on the boards. He's also taken a ton of big hits and been relatively fine. I just think he plays a very aggressive style at speed and shit happens. He could probably afford to be heavier but would lose some speed and honestly it would not change the nature of any of those plays above. He's had some smaller injuries too but I can't think of any that weren't a result of just playing a hard style for a star.
The latest injury he was braced well for the hit but Tinordi is so damn tall he had to crouch and almost lead with his knee. An unlucky knee on knee collision. If their knees don't collide that hit is nothing.
It IS ok to have a mix of speed, size and physicality and not focus solely on having every player in the roster be a speed demon, sacrificing other aspects of the game.Speed is always going to be king but speed and size and physicality is a much better thing as well as 2 way play. Why not have it all if you can?