Proposal: Columbus- Anaheim

[Ducks in a row]

Scott Hartnell
Anton Forsberg


For

Clayton Stoner
Max Jones

Forsberg could be a back-up this year IMO, but will be a solid fall back in case of injury. Hartnell plays on the 1st line with Getzlaf and Perry. Would be a solid clean-up man.

Stoner doesn't add much to Columbus, but he is a solid bottom pairing dman. Injuries happen and he can fill in. Lots of young players on defense, and he's a vet. Plus, a 1st round pick in 2016, in the Hartnell mold.

If you don't like it, thats ok.

Don't see us trading a most recent 1st round drafted player and Hartnell makes too much.

 

[JKinCLE]

I would REALLY love to have a stoner jersey though.

 

[Crazy8oooo]

Why in the hell would we want to get rid of Hartnell at this point? You act like your doing us a favor - he is more productive than that, and our young guys need someone in the room with them. We will keep Hartnell thank you very much

You must be quoting the wrong person because I'm not the Op and I never supported the proposal. Re-read what you quoted me on and you'll see that I said this doesn't work for the Ducks.

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

You do realize that the person that started this thread isn't a Ducks fan, right? That most of us that are, are pretty lukewarm on picking up someone with his salary and age, since we're a budget team?

It's cool, man. My post worked.

 

[Vatican Roulette]

I'm am not a fan of either team and meant no disrespect.

Just thought it might work.

If not, then that's ok.

 

[Vatican Roulette]

Just not to start a new thread and take up band with and such....

Hartnell
Harrington

For

Emelin
McCarron

 

[Curufinwe]

For a trade to work between Anaheim and Columbus just do Hartnell for Bieksa and a draft pick straight up.

Columbus would have to retain 750k in the first 2 years and 2.375mil in the last year of Hartnell's deal.

To Columbus: D Bieksa and say a 3rd round pick
To Anaheim: LW Hartnell < with retained salary

Retention has to be the same amount each year.

 

[robbieboy3686]

In all likelihood, Bieksa doesn't factor in on expansion protection at all. He will either waive his NMC to be left unprotected (a formality since Vegas won't take him), or if he refuses he'll be bought out of the final year of his deal. Both of those are much more likely scenarios than letting him eat up a protection slot over better, younger, cheaper Dmen.

If BM promises to honor the NMC after the expansion draft, there's no reason for Bieksa not to play ball.

As for the OP deal, I think it should just be simplified to Stoner + 2nd for Hartnell , anything more steep than that and I would pass. I really can't see the Ducks flipping Jones away already, and I'd say he fits more of a need than Forsberg.

BM allows all his draft picks to develop, especially top 2 rounders, I also like hartnell, would make a great fit on our team.

 

[Viqsi]

Just not to start a new thread and take up band with and such....

Hartnell
Harrington

For

Emelin
McCarron

Overpriced bottom pairing blueliner plus winger prospect proposal for Hartnell is turned down because we have zero interest in overpriced blueliners - especially LHDs since we have a ton of those already - and are overfull on winger prospects. Your response is to offer a different winger prospect of even less interest and an even more absurdly overpriced bottom pairing LH blueliner.

You have learned nothing. Leave in disgrace.