I don't see how that is relevant to that play in particular. You trying to tell me it wasn't a good move? Why is it so hard to just give credit to the opposition once instead of always demeaning our players? Pavelec made a great play.He's been spectacularly below average as an NHLer as a whole this season, looks like we just traded for him again. He should be in the AHL over the likes of Everberg based on play alone. Not over Cliche obviously but I have a hard time thinking of who's been worse.
Were all going to be bagging on Briere when he only finishes up the year with 25 points or so, but what can you expect when he's playing with plugs like Cliche and Mcleod
Not the "Mc" I want to score a goal but thank you thank you thank you
Hey guys ive been following every game this year with a stupid game tracker/boxscore. Is it worth the money to buy game center or center ice to watch the avs?
I think all players that are playing in the nhl should have some offensive abilities. But I don't see any in cliché, McLeod or Talbot. Even bordeleau had more skill.
Maybe if we had more all round 3rd and 4th liners like Mitchell or mcginn we would be a bit better off no?
Not saying that one player cant be a defensive specialist but to have 3 players is a little too much for my liking
Briere is the problem, Talbot is the problem, Mitchell is the problem, McLeod is the problem, Cliche is the problem. Am I doing it right?
Can we just have a 3rd line with players from the top 2 lines? And no 4th line, those guys suck!
In fact, let's just play MacKinnon and Duchene all game, they score sometimes!
The problem with the bottom 6 is a lack of coherent identity. I think Mcleod/Cliche are thoroughly average and replaceable but more than that I think the big problem is we don't have a group of guys that complement each other.
That seems like something that could work itself out over the next 73 games, especially with the return of Winchester
Depends where you live. Living in Canada there aren't that many blackouts on GCL especially since we don't play the Edm/Cgy/Van as often anymore. I watch pretty much every game on it and its been good value.
Tanguay - Duchene - Iginla
O'Reilly - MacKinnon - Landeskog (I think they'll figure it out, and they've been a bit better lately)
McGinn - Mitchell - Everberg
Talbot - Winchester - Brière
That would be a pretty decent bottom 6.
The problem with the bottom 6 is a lack of coherent identity. I think Mcleod/Cliche are thoroughly average and replaceable but more than that I think the big problem is we don't have a group of guys that complement each other.
Everything we have seen or heard related to McLeod suggests he won't be out of the lineup as long as he's healthy.
I'm happy we got a PP but that double-minor for bleeding rule is pretty dumb.
I don't see how that is relevant to that play in particular. You trying to tell me it wasn't a good move? Why is it so hard to just give credit to the opposition once instead of always demeaning our players? Pavelec made a great play.
But you're right about Talbot in general.
mackinnon has only 3:32 icetime. 2nd least after briere 3:31
o'reilly 4:24 and landeskog 5:14 is stupid as well.
cliché 5:13 is pathetic
1st line/2nd line should be 20:00ish a game
I'm happy we got a PP but that double-minor for bleeding rule is pretty dumb.
Yes i live in canada, but its just i dont want to pay for it if they black out avs games
Yes i live in canada, but its just i dont want to pay for it if they black out avs games
mackinnon has only 3:32 icetime. 2nd least after briere 3:31
o'reilly 4:24 and landeskog 5:14 is stupid as well.
cliché 5:13 is pathetic
1st line/2nd line should be 20:00ish a game
Tanguay - Duchene - Iginla
O'Reilly - MacKinnon - Landeskog (I think they'll figure it out, and they've been a bit better lately)
McGinn - Mitchell - Everberg
Talbot - Winchester - Brière
That would be a pretty decent bottom 6.
I dont mind Talbot on this team , he's a leader and a winner we need this type of guy on a team . Mcleod Cliche are a little lost in our lineup , i feel like they should bring a lot more to the table and when they dont, that's when we have a problem and we would be better suited with other players .
I agree about the complement part , we always talk about how important chemistry is on our top 6 that we forget how important it is to have chemistry on the bottom 6 also .