GindyDraws
#HutchOut
So, Washington State and Oregon State are two schools. The Mountain West is 11 plus Hawaii as a football member, and the WCC is 9, with only San Diego being non scholarship in football.How many teams is that?
So, Washington State and Oregon State are two schools. The Mountain West is 11 plus Hawaii as a football member, and the WCC is 9, with only San Diego being non scholarship in football.How many teams is that?
Gonzaga and Saint Mary's need to be with other strong basketball-focused schools. That's where my proposed geographic split of the Big East comes in.
you do realize the Big East is predominately catholic schools and not the original Big East conference..... it's why BC is in the ACCThe Big East doesn't need Gonzaga or Saint Mary's (they need a bottom of the league, but would never do that; they built the league wrong because they're dumb and I said so for 10 years and it was obvious how that cost them this season).
you do realize the Big East is predominately catholic schools and not the original Big East conference..... it's why BC is in the ACC
The Zags and SMC wouldn't be in the Big East, they'd be in the new conference I am proposing that also includes the Midwest schools in the Big East and A-10, plus Valpo and Detroit Mercy.Uh... yes. The Big East got three teams into the NCAA Tournament, all as 1-2-3 seeds, and got no one else into the tournament because teams 4-9 in the conference are pretty much exactly the same in terms of how good their program is.
But they played each other -- just that group of six teams -- 10 times each. Because they have 20 conference games, only 10 out of conference games, and play 16 games against teams good enough to be NCAA Tournament teams (with bad records vs teams 1-3), they just mathematically can't all win at the same time.
They built the conference wrong. The ratio of teams in it aren't conducive to maximizing NCAA bids. DePaul made the NCAA Tournament in old C-USA, when they "thirds" of the conference be prestigious programs, good programs and.... guys who were there for market or football.
6-0 vs the bottom, 4-2 vs the middle, and 2-4 vs the top and you're 12-6 in conference, 21-9 overall and in the NCAA tournament.
Doing that in the new Big East makes you 10-10 in conference and 18-13 overall and in the NIT like Seton Hall.
They built the new Big East on the premise that you WANT to be the strongest, top-to-bottom, so you can say you're the best conference in the country. But that gets you nothing.
They don't need Gonzaga and Saint Mary's, because they'd just have 11 teams beating the crap out of each other. You need tiers within your conference, and the top half of the middle tier gets in just by getting those wins over the rest of that tier.
About time Boise goes for it.
The other schools probably have to come from the AAC if it’s not the Mountain West. Tulane should be a target if they can convince anyone that they will be a level above it. I’m leery on the idea that they’d get their AQ spot back.
That doesn't make sense though. There will be natural tiers built based on results. If an above average program team routinely fails to make the NCAA tournament, they will cease being an above average program because it will be a less attractive destination for players.Uh... yes. The Big East got three teams into the NCAA Tournament, all as 1-2-3 seeds, and got no one else into the tournament because teams 4-9 in the conference are pretty much exactly the same in terms of how good their program is.
But they played each other -- just that group of six teams -- 10 times each. Because they have 20 conference games, only 10 out of conference games, and play 16 games against teams good enough to be NCAA Tournament teams (with bad records vs teams 1-3), they just mathematically can't all win at the same time.
They built the conference wrong. The ratio of teams in it aren't conducive to maximizing NCAA bids. DePaul made the NCAA Tournament in old C-USA, when they "thirds" of the conference be prestigious programs, good programs and.... guys who were there for market or football.
6-0 vs the bottom, 4-2 vs the middle, and 2-4 vs the top and you're 12-6 in conference, 21-9 overall and in the NCAA tournament.
Doing that in the new Big East makes you 10-10 in conference and 18-13 overall and in the NIT like Seton Hall.
They built the new Big East on the premise that you WANT to be the strongest, top-to-bottom, so you can say you're the best conference in the country. But that gets you nothing.
They don't need Gonzaga and Saint Mary's, because they'd just have 11 teams beating the crap out of each other. You need tiers within your conference, and the top half of the middle tier gets in just by getting those wins over the rest of that tier.
Hard to split off from University of Nevada (Reno) aka UNR.UNLV should've been the 1st call they made. Can't underestimate the value of being in Vegas to their profile.
It could happen if UNLV changes their name to Nevada Tech and their nickname to Blackjacks.Hard to split off from University of Nevada (Reno) aka UNR.