cbjthrowaway
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2020
- 2,389
- 4,250
Or Danforth.0-5-5 in 15 games. If he isn't sent down he's absolutely screwed this season. He looks better than last year but not like he should be in Columbus. When Laine is more settled hopefully he moves to C, Bemstrom slots in, and Sillinger goes to Cleveland.
I like him where he's at. I think he helps Kuraly a lot and keeps the 4th line going. Splitting him and Kuraly hurts both of them in my eyes.Or Danforth.
I get it, Johnson getting sent down gave me a glimmer of hope though. With their approach I do not consider Sillinger part of the team's future. His skating and tool set as a player required a very sound plan for his first few seasons as a pro in order to get him to a good NHL center level, and the approach the team is taking has not even been close to what he needed.Sillinger isn't going to be sent down. We're long past the stage of thinking about this in terms of worrying how many games until he hits waivers. Just think of this as a decision you disagree with.
What makes this feel even worse is he's only 20. It doesn't have to be this way - but from the point the team threw away that rare chance to put him in the AHL right out of juniors to now they've done all they can to ensure he doesn't have a shot to be an NHL contributer.Sillinger looks like he could top out as a middling, dime-a-dozen bottom six forward. His most likely slotting will be as an organizational depth player on a two way contract or a career overseas.
If he gets claimed when (if) he gets sent down, I'd be about as concerned as I was about Foudy being claimed. Which is to say not at all.
I also think he can't skate and isn't a hockey genius for NHL standards to cover for it so he might have not been good enough anyways.I'm not sure if the organization is trying to account for something in Sillinger's mental/emotional makeup, if they are hamstrung by his better-than-expected rookie/draft season play or if they just are plain old making a confounding decision with the player's development. But there is a disconnect with our understanding of the situation and what's happening.
You're saying the organization gave up on his development and is allowing him to settle in permanently at the NHL level as a third-line player, albeit one they hope is a plus player in that role?I also think he can't skate and isn't a hockey genius for NHL standards to cover for it so he might have not been good enough anyways.
No I just wanted to add a footnote that acknowledges he might have still "failed" even if he was put in the AHL when we all thought he should have because he had some major flaws even for a pre-draft prospect, but maybe what you just said is a possibility too? That makes some sense. I don't know.You're saying the organization gave up on his development and is allowing him to settle in permanently at the NHL level as a third-line player, albeit one they hope is a plus player in that role?
For sure. If we're starting with the assumption that the consensus here is that he should have been or still should be sent down - for his development and for the team right now - then there is definitely a disconnect between how we see it and how thee organization sees it. Which doesn't make our "consensus" wrong, just that there is clearly information or context that we're lacking regarding decision-making. (Which always stands to reason, even when there is effective media coverage.)No I just wanted to add a footnote that acknowledges he might have still "failed" even if he was put in the AHL when we all thought he should have because he had some major flaws even for a pre-draft prospect, but maybe what you just said is a possibility too? That makes some sense. I don't know.
there are a ton of guys picked in the 8-15 range who fit the same profile:No I just wanted to add a footnote that acknowledges he might have still "failed" even if he was put in the AHL when we all thought he should have because he had some major flaws even for a pre-draft prospect, but maybe what you just said is a possibility too? That makes some sense. I don't know.
AHL time won't fundamentally change what kind of player he is – it won't make him faster, it won't suddenly turn him into a guy who can be the primary puck carrier on an NHL scoring line, etc.
Or he may just not be that good. He never had blow-you-away numbers in juniors.What makes this feel even worse is he's only 20. It doesn't have to be this way - but from the point the team threw away that rare chance to put him in the AHL right out of juniors to now they've done all they can to ensure he doesn't have a shot to be an NHL contributer.
I think we are stuck with him this year.One more game and he requires waivers to go to the AHL. He's 3-13-16 in his last 81 NHL games.
For comparison, Sean Kuraly has 5 goals and Justin Danforth has 4 goals *this* season.
Sean Kuraly is 2nd on the team in goals, its a much bigger issue than silly lolOne more game and he requires waivers to go to the AHL. He's 3-13-16 in his last 81 NHL games.
For comparison, Sean Kuraly has 5 goals and Justin Danforth has 4 goals *this* season.
Again, we can save ourselves a step and assume this is a decision already made. You can hate it, but it’s not worth wondering if he’ll get sent down before becoming waiver eligible.One more game and he requires waivers to go to the AHL. He's 3-13-16 in his last 81 NHL games.
For comparison, Sean Kuraly has 5 goals and Justin Danforth has 4 goals *this* season.
Gaudreau has 1 EN goal.One more game and he requires waivers to go to the AHL. He's 3-13-16 in his last 81 NHL games.
For comparison, Sean Kuraly has 5 goals and Justin Danforth has 4 goals *this* season.