Yeah absolutely. I'm of the opinion that in a hard cap league you have to take sensible risks and try to lock in players you project will outperform the number you sign them to. To me the entire conversation about "prove it first" is not really about proving it, it's about risk tolerance.
It can't be if you're negotiating over the long term for a 2nd year contract.
I mean what are you going to do, force 2nd year players to sign long term for 8 years based on what they've proven so far?
Jack Hughes had 52pts in 117 games when he signed his contract, based on this "prove it first" theory, he should have signed for 8 years at 3.5M!!!!????
It's perfectly reasonable to have a lower tolerance for risk and want to wait until your players prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they're special before you pay them accordingly, and some teams have been successful (Boston) operating that way. The paradox is that the risk-averse contract strategy in a hard cap league can often be riskier in the long term if it means you're paying UFA sticker price on all your core players.
Basically...I think when you identify core players, you pay them.
I don't see what the issue is here personally...if there's 2 players who provide cost certain or anything close to it.
Its both Suzuki and Caufield.