Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,940
- 32,797
Ok, so then this deal fell apart over, at the most, $750k a year or 6m over 8 years.
Who’s to blame?
The Avs set their max at $11.75m x 8y.
Kypreos says he would’ve signed for less than MacKinnon. Kypreos’ contacts are always the agents.
Was that $750k per season, at the most, so important to Mikko to essentially force the Avalanche’s hand into a trade? He just expected to wait us out and we would eventually cave at the 11th hour before he hit free agency?
CMac wasn’t comfortable with that. This was the outcome.
Looks like the team is to blame IMO. That $750k difference is on the compromise number, not the initial ask from Mikko.
It feels to me, like maybe the Avs never really seriously intended on re-signing Mikko, unless he came at a big hometown discount.
A number around Nate's $12.6M always seemed like the no brainer compromise number. Nate's deal will be underpaid very soon, Mikko is signing under a bigger cap, and it's around $1.5M less than Drai's contract with the same agent. Very fair number for Mikko IMO.
The highest paid wingers making $11.6M signed years ago under smaller caps, Mikko is better than them, and the cap is about to take some huge jumps. Marner and Kaprizov will likely sign for bigger contracts than $12.6M soon. Potentially a lot more on the open market.
I think the Avs have changed their team building strategy in the last year.
Spending more on goaltending, trying to spend less on D then maybe realizing they need to spend more on D again, and now perhaps spending cap on a 4 line depth approach, instead of spot filling around a top heavy forward group/deep D core/cheap goaltending approach.