I wouldn’t say confirmed, Pam can sometimes inject opinion, but it seems pretty close
Either way, even if Zaitsev thrives for us and Brown returns a good asset, we did not leverage this situation nearly as well as we could or should have
Yeah, agreed on all points.
Like... Am I happy Ceci is gone? Sure. But if we wanted him gone, we could have just not qualified him, and walked away. Getting rid of Ceci was literally as easy as "do literally nothing, and he becomes a UFA". We didn't have to take a bad contract back to get rid of him. We could have just not done anything, and he would have left.
So
MAYBE Zaitsev works out for us. Is he going to be worth $4.5/year?
Maybe. We're taking a big chance on him, no doubt influenced by our new coach, so that's at least encouraging. But if you remove "wanting to get rid of Ceci" from the equation, it seems like we gave Toronto a "Get Out Of Cap-Hell Free" card.
In a vacuum, the trade seems lackluster (I'm not convinced it's disastrous or anything, at least until I see 30ish games out of Zaitsev away from Babcock and in a Sens uniform to evaluate on my own), but it seems like a MASSIVE missed opportunity on our end to properly leverage the very unique position we are in at the moment as a team with tens of millions of dollars in cap space we should be flaunting and using.
... But rather than do that, we are the kind of team that sells draft picks for money, which is enough of a clue that we're probably not going to leverage our cap space at all, and that this trade wasn't about taking advantage of Toronto at all, it was about our own internal budget.
So... Mixed emotions here, obviously. There's some good here for sure, if we (or Coach Smith) thinks Zaitsev can rebound...and there's some bad... and some telling signs about our organization's M.O.