John Price
Gang Gang
- Sep 19, 2008
- 384,080
- 30,134
Wouldn't him settling cases be enough to prove that?The NFL (as pretty much any league) has the token ethics code:
They must have found enough evidence in the 23 cases that indicates enough 'conduct detrimental to the integrity of .... the NFL.
No and yes.Wouldn't him settling cases be enough to prove that?
I'd say yes, but it's pretty much a judgment call of Goodell. A strongly worded tweet could probably earn that designation. It's really just a blanket term for them to be able to have power to choose who and when to suspend.Wouldn't him settling cases be enough to prove that?
I would imagine that Kamara will likely get 3 games or so. Though his does involve more criminal aspect, Watson wasn't being tried criminally.So Alvin Kamara is going to get the same suspension as Watson. One is a bar fight and one is 24 sexual assaults. Incredible..
Clearly shitting on the league for not having a stronger policy here.This is a very interesting game the arbitrator is playing here.
Yeah you got to it before I could get there. The NFL looks stupid no matter what. She eschewed ‘doing the right thing’ in this case for exposing the NFL’s flawed system. This guy gets every cent guaranteed once the suspension is over. The PA put out a statement stating they were accepting the arbitrator’s ruling for a reason.Clearly shitting on the league for not having a stronger policy here.
If I recall correctly, the some of the accusations went to Grand Jury and they declined an indictment. A lot of these cases boil down to one word vs another. It’s difficult to get evidence to support a claim in most cases. Then naturally, a few of the cases are absurd. An Insta model getting flown across the country to give him a massage for example. He’s guilty as hell, but how far can you go if it can’t be pursued legally. The “why would he pay them if he was innocent” angle really doesn’t play.i have no idea...
well this is a civil matter vs criminal one. so your implication is these women are choosing to get paid some money in exchange for not seeking criminal justice against him which would be a disservice to other/future victims.
Guess I'm just a pessimist when it comes to a lot of things involving money.
I’d pump the brakes a little bit. This was an arbitration decision.Yes, the women seeking settlements are choosing money over justice.
That’s why this is so frustrating. The NFL and NFLPA have the opportunity to serve some justice and they aren’t. I’m done with the league.
I’d pump the brakes a little bit. This was an arbitration decision.
The NFLPA will support their member right or wrong. That’s what unions do.
The NFL didn’t make this decision. This is the important thing to remember.
The NFL has a chance to come out smelling like roses. They have 3 days and they can pursue suspending him for a full season which would essentially triple the penalty. It’s a long shot, but it’s possible.
That’s fine. I get it. To each their own.Good unions have good policies and what they do and do not agree to support. The NFLPA lacks that and I will not support their league because of it.
The appeal, per the CBA, goes to Roger Goodell. The NFLPA signed the agreement, they don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to "appealing the appeal" so to speak.They appeal they likely end up in federal court with all the dirty laundry about Snyder and Kraft being aired daily.
By the CBA, once an appeal is filed Goodell (or a designee) has two days to respond to it with a final ruling. It won't even drag out to the first pre-season game, much less the regular season. Watson will not be playing opening day regardless.I am all for bashing the NFL on this but this isn't their ruling.
But like GKJ said, if they appeal, Watson plays on opening day as appeals take time so...
The grand juries choosing not to charge him with a crime didn’t have anything to do with the lawsuits he settled. Those civil cases were still heading for trial.If I recall correctly, the some of the accusations went to Grand Jury and they declined an indictment. A lot of these cases boil down to one word vs another. It’s difficult to get evidence to support a claim in most cases. Then naturally, a few of the cases are absurd. An Insta model getting flown across the country to give him a massage for example. He’s guilty as hell, but how far can you go if it can’t be pursued legally. The “why would he pay them if he was innocent” angle really doesn’t play.
We all know he’s guilty as sin and should’ve gotten a year, but it is what it is. The NFL has other avenues if so inclined.
Wow, Browns fans feigning their disgust over Watson and his behavior will be his biggest fans after a little over 33% of the 2022 season, instead of having to feign disgust over the whole 2022 season. Congrats Cleveland!
Watson absolutely can take it to federal court, and the amount of mud that they will sling at Kraft and Snyder and unequal punishments will be ugly. Now, it could eventually get thrown out, but Watson and Rusty Hardin can go nuclear if they want.The appeal, per the CBA, goes to Roger Goodell. The NFLPA signed the agreement, they don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to "appealing the appeal" so to speak.
If the NFL wishes, they can lengthen the suspension - the downside is basically the optics of Goodell acting like judge, jury, and executioner again.
By the CBA, once an appeal is filed Goodell (or a designee) has two days to respond to it with a final ruling. It won't even drag out to the first pre-season game, much less the regular season. Watson will not be playing opening day regardless.