IpsoPostFacto
No opinions, just reactions
- Dec 17, 2017
- 828
- 915
looks like basic laws of economics has won out again. It would appear that the number of teams 'demanding' to have Jacob was approximately 1.
“Obviously, when you see a stretcher come out it’s always concerning, so I think it was a little scarier than it appeared to be. Not that it wasn’t a bad scene when anyone goes unconscious. If a stretcher wasn’t required and I was able to get up and walk off the ice, it obviously would have been a great sign to everyone watching, including my family. It was still scary — maybe not as scary as it seemed, but it was still something that I’ve never experienced and my family has never experienced.”awful return.... wasn't he seriously injured in April?
disappointed in our new management!
I actually don't mind this deal. Jensen plays the right side, skates well, plays defensive. He's not as good as Chychrun should be, but Chychrun wasn't as good as he should be last season either. I think this is fine...if Jensen can have a bit of a bounce back.
Like that Jensen seems to be a good PK guy. Apparently has a good 1st pass, defense first, skates pretty well.
Definitely a better fit positionally.
I keep seeing some people say he's a good skater and others say he's old and slow...
I don't remember him ever being more than average skater in his prime, and now he's clearly slower than he uses to be, and the game is getting faster.
Can he still keep up with speedy forwards?
Stay at homeThis trade means no more excuses for Chabot.
Although somehow I don't think it was Chychrun's fault he keeps fumbling pucks at the blue line.
Jensen maybe a Methot type piece,
Could be a good fit we'll see
Oh I know, its pure copeHe's turning 34 soon, and has a lot of mileage on him. So if you're picturing the Methot Ottawa saw, you'll be greatly disappointed.
He's turning 34 soon, and has a lot of mileage on him. So if you're picturing the Methot Ottawa saw, you'll be greatly disappointed.
Are we sure Jensen at 34 is better than Marino who we could have had for very cheap?
Are we sure?