A1LeafNation
Good, is simply not good enough!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,817
- 17,960
Value of: Christopher Tanev to Toronto
- Thread starter clunk
- Start date
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
Holy ****. Nylander PLUS Marner? Bahahaha hahaha
If it costs either one of Nylander or Marne, I'd have no problem walking away
clunk
Registered User
I'm sorry. I never meant for it to get this bad. I just tried to get some agreement on value but this thread has turned nuts, lol. I'm so, so sorry.
Jimmy Firecracker
They Fired Sheldon!
He sure looked like a defensive ace on that first Anaheim goal tonight. Definitely warrants the return of two blue chippers.
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
What's laughable is a leafs 1st round pick being a main piece in a trade for Tanev, Tanev playing on the leafs makes them at the very least a borderline playoff team, which makes that pick a mid rounder, not even close to enough to get Tanev.
As it has been said, we don't want to trade him, which means if your team wants him you overpay, ie. your giving up a player you don't want to.
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
He sure looked like a defensive ace on that first Anaheim goal tonight. Definitely warrants the return of two blue chippers.
Yep, GM's totally base value on one single play...
Big Easy
Registered User
Van has no need for Dickey or Tulo, as they do not have a baseball team. Just Benning and the twins.
Jimmy Firecracker
They Fired Sheldon!
Yep, GM's totally base value on one single play...
That's what the sarcasm face was for, but looking at it now I can see you'd think I meant it just for the last part of my post.
That proposal is still ridiculous. Two forwards who project to be 60+ scores, one a centre, for a one dimensional defenseman. I don't care how good defensively he is, no 20 point defenseman is worth that much.
You also severely undeeestimate Leafs-LuckTM. Once that pick is in the hands of another team it's guaranteed to be high, regardless of who we traded it for.
Bozak+2nd+B prospect
Or
Kadri+3rd+B prospect
Or
Gardiner + B prospect.
Is all I'd feel comfortable trading for a great defensive, 1 dimensional defenseman.
Does any of that interest the Canucks?
Or
Kadri+3rd+B prospect
Or
Gardiner + B prospect.
Is all I'd feel comfortable trading for a great defensive, 1 dimensional defenseman.
Does any of that interest the Canucks?
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
No.
We don't want to trade Tanev, only thing that will interest us are players your team won't give up.
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
I responded to your sarcasm with sarcasm, I thought that was clear.
Great, we'll keep our defensive defenseman, you keep your two superstars.
Sergei Shirokov
Registered User
No.
We don't want to trade Tanev, only thing that will interest us are players your team won't give up.
Ok no problem.
We'll develop our own defensemen without giving up any assets than.
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 76,633
- 43,139
Yep, GM's totally base value on one single play...
Of course not.
As this thread has led us to believe, GM's base all player value on one single trade(Hall/Larsson).
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
That would make Tanev a bigger miracle worker than Jesus....and that Jesus guy was pretty good....
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Does the Leafs D suck? Yep. Would Tanev improve it? Yep. Are the Leafs in win now mode? Nope. Does it make sense to trade a blue chipper for a quick fix? Nope.
We will continue to build via the draft.
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
I said you would be a borderline playoff team, not a contender,
if you can't see that having a top pairing of Rielly/Tanev would make a big difference, then I don't know what to tell ya.
Diamonddog01
Diamond in the rough
Simply no deal to be made. Terrible proposal in the OP and no common ground to found afterwards. This thread was an immense waste of time.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
I said you would be a borderline playoff team, not a contender,
As i said, he'd be an improvement. I have been wishing him to TO for quite some time....but it doesn't make sense to pay the big price at this stage of our build. The goal isn't to be "borderline" this season, it's to contend in the future. Trading Marner/Nylander isn't an answer to anything....continuing to build via the draft is.
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
Oh I totally agree, and that's why I have said through out this thread that there is no way the leafs would do it. My point was made due to one of your fans offering up a 1st rounder, with the addition of Tanev, I think that 1st becomes a mid rounder, which isn't enough in my opinion, that was my only point.
skyo
Benning Squad
Due to contract status' as in JVR is a UFA in a one in a half seasons, what about JVR + kap for Tanner.
Randy Randerson
Registered User
Tanner....Tanev?
If so, I could get on board with that as a leaf fan. Kapanen's trade value should rise this season as he gets AHL scoring opportunity, has looked great so far
Last edited:
Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
Doesn't Kap look like a perennial 3rd liner? I thought that I have read leafs and pens fans talk about that?
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Players who passed on greatness/improved teammates- Latest: gretzkyoilers
-
-
-
