Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Gaunce - Reilly is closer to tanev-kadri
This thread is all kinds of silly,
Agreed.
Gaunce - Reilly is closer to tanev-kadri
This thread is all kinds of silly,
Super easy to say that isn't true. Not saying the OP is fair for Tanev, but that is further apart not closerGaunce - Reilly is closer to tanev-kadri
This thread is all kinds of silly,
Super easy to say that isn't true. Not saying the OP is fair for Tanev, but that is further apart not closer
its saying things like this that make these threads silly, because the other side reacts with a more outrageous response, wash, rinse, repeat.
There was a point where this thread got half assed productive, but I don't get why people come into these things to flame them
Actually how you feel and value Reilly is very similar to how Tanev is viewed in Vancouver. Gaunce has a long NHL career ahead of him, and the only question is if he can score.and I've always found kadri overrated and wouldn't be a big part of a good team.
Tanev is he worth nylander and marner ? Cmon in today's NHL which is all about youth and speed and elc contracts. That kinda deal doesn't happen the last one was probably Kessel to Toronto. So like I said the idea of trading 2 high end elc contributing players doesn't happen it's ludicrous
Which is why this is all kinds of silly
its not that we mean to dump on kadris value
but ur dumping on tanevs value by suggesting kadri
kadri is not a good piece because u dont need him and 29 teams know u dont need him
so offering him for our best defensemen is laughable and we will compare gaunce to reilly as it makes reillys valuable laughable as we dont need gaunce and reilly is ur best defensemen
toronto van threads should be banned terrible trade partners
As opposed to the Nucks fan saying Marner+Nylander for Tanev? Say crazy things....get crazy responses.
Completely agree that Kadri is not close to enough to get Tanev. There would be a significant add from our side and I think JVR might make more sense as a starting point because you could flip him for more futures. And I disagree about us being terrible trade partners, we're in opposite conferences with different strengths of players in different stages of the rebuild-compete-rebuild cycle
Rielly>Tanev in trade value because of age and upside, they're similar impact players this year and the trade value gap isn't huge but it favours Rielly
Kadri>>Gaunce - Kadri's a real deal 2nd line centre, still only 26 and on a team friendly contract. Gaunce might stick in the NHL, he might not and he's 4 years removed from his draft. I haven't seen any indications that Gaunce can be an impact NHL'er, so I would think his ceiling is around what Kadri is at a less valuable position and that's starting to look like a long shot
What I'm saying is that countering with a more ridiculous proposal doesn't do anything constructive in these threads, it starts a cycle of flaming. The purpose of these threads is to be a sounding board for trade ideas, as soon as everyone digs their heels in and gets ridiculous they lose their value and fun
yea but level of ridiculous doesnt matter its a bad trade the intensity of its badness doesnt matter at all
Well, that conversation wouldn't be with Vancouver.Think Marner or Nylander+ to get the conversation started