Kreider for Frederic? Posted the same in the Bruins-Rangers thread. Rags get a younger player they can extend, B's hopefully get scoring help.
premise is ridiculous? sez youjesus f***ing christ lmao come on man.
not only is it a ridiculous premise, you went 0 for 2 on spelling of these guys names.
If you're getting any of those versions then it really doesn't make a difference at that cap hit, especially since all those versions were above 30 goals. Whether or not that's what you're getting might be a different story.It's a high cap hit for a guy who went from 77 to 64 to 75 points. Which version re you getting? Likely the 54 point one given his age. He also has a 15 team NTC so that limits options. & hes on pace for 41 points this year.
would rather add for McAvoy instead of Carlo tho I gather if Bs are not fire sale for some of their roster, might not be doableCarlo for Kreider as a base of a trade
Yes let’s give you the best net-front player in the league for your problem. C’mon people. Kreider is getting at the very least a 1st and a good prospect.How about Josh Anderson? Two big guys that might benefit from a fresh start. Two more years left each. Kreider is more talented, but also 3 years older.
Rangers would save 1M cap hit per year.
Habs looking for offense while Anderson is not penciled in their top 6.
Just a thought.
No. Kreider is good and has value and will fetch a decent return. The Rangers are only entertaining the idea because Panarin, Lafreniere, Cuylle, Othmann, Berard, and Perreault are all natural LWs. We aren’t trading Kreider for another LW, especially one way worse like Frederic.Kreider for Frederic? Posted the same in the Bruins-Rangers thread. Rags get a younger player they can extend, B's hopefully get scoring help.