Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Chris Kreider Part II: Manimal

  • Thread starter Thread starter *Bob Richards*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jaromir Kreider a breakthrough season in October?

I rather keep Chris K. and move Zib when we need more draft picks in 2019 draft.
 
Inferno said:
CK is one of the best net front guys in the entire league..and has been since like his 2nd season in the NHL.
Click to expand...
This will show my age but I've been yelling at the clouds for so long that the Rangers needed a guy who played like Tim Kerr in front of the net. I hated him of course but I admired his play so much. He was a beast of an immovable force in front of the net.

The Rangers hardly ever had anyone that played close to how Kerr played. But I like your thought on Krieder. And he's only going to get better and tougher. Rangers have to keep him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KOVALEV022473
Metranger said:
This will show my age but I've been yelling at the clouds for so long that the Rangers needed a guy who played like Tim Kerr in front of the net. I hated him of course but I admired his play so much. He was a beast of an immovable force in front of the net.

The Rangers hardly ever had anyone that played close to how Kerr played. But I like your thought on Krieder. And he's only going to get better and tougher. Rangers have to keep him.
Click to expand...

Kerr averaged over 50 goals for 5 seasons. Kreider has only broken 50 points once in his career.

Kreider screens.

Kerr was a goal-scoring machine who screened.
 
chosen said:
Kerr averaged over 50 goals for 5 seasons. Kreider has only broken 50 points once in his career.

Kreider screens.

Kerr was a goal-scoring machine who screened.
Click to expand...
Yes but I was referring only to Kerr's ability to screen and be a nuisance in front of the net. Something that the Rangers have lacked for a long time. Krieder can bring that element.
 
Metranger said:
Yes but I was referring only to Kerr's ability to screen and be a nuisance in front of the net. Something that the Rangers have lacked for a long time. Krieder can bring that element.
Click to expand...

Kreider does bring that element.

Nobody in the NHL tips more pucks on net than Kreider.

If we actually shot the puck, I think that would be more fruitful, but AV hated shooting the puck.
 
Machinehead said:
Kreider does bring that element.

Nobody in the NHL tips more pucks on net than Kreider.

If we actually shot the puck, I think that would be more fruitful, but AV hated shooting the puck.
Click to expand...
That's you just joking right? That's too stupid a philosophy even for AV.
 
Machinehead said:
Kreider does bring that element.

Nobody in the NHL tips more pucks on net than Kreider.

If we actually shot the puck, I think that would be more fruitful, but AV hated shooting the puck.
Click to expand...

Pavelski doesn't tip more pucks on net than Kreider? You don't seriously believe that.
 
chosen said:
Doesn't your link prove that Kreider has a higher percentage of tips for goals than shots tipped on net?
Click to expand...

Given that tips tend to be luck-based in terms of whether or not they go in, it's extremely likely that he's also attempted more.
 
Machinehead said:
Given that tips tend to be luck-based in terms of whether or not they go in, it's extremely likely that he's also attempted more.
Click to expand...
I can assure you that tips going in are no more lucky than any other goal going in. And back when Kerr played guys got slashed and hacked and murdered in front of the net
 
Machinehead said:
Have you watched this team the last three years?
Click to expand...
I have. Even longer.

I've seen a lack of shooting on the PP in droves. Made me sick....Did not realize it was AV's philosophy that guided lack of shooting. I thought it was lack of initiative and confidence.
 
Metranger said:
I have. Even longer.

I've seen a lack of shooting on the PP in droves. Made me sick....Did not realize it was AV's philosophy that guided lack of shooting. I thought it was lack of initiative and confidence.
Click to expand...

I don't think the players lack initiative and confidence. I think the coach did, and he definitely coached them to pass up shots unless they were incredible chances.

That's why we've been near the bottom in shots generated and near the top in shooting percentage for some time now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miamipuck
Machinehead said:
I can assure you that's not how physics works.
Click to expand...
Why would you be part of a fan forum to legitimately post nonsense just to anger as many people as possible. We come here to debate our team and you come to make silly childish arguments that are completely irrelevant to sports.

I actually believe I’m starting to figure you out. I see you post in s video game thread. Your other posts make sense now.
 
Nopuckluck said:
Why would you be part of a fan forum to legitimately post nonsense just to anger as many people as possible. We come here to debate our team and you come to make silly childish arguments that are completely irrelevant to sports.

I actually believe I’m starting to figure you out. I see you post in s video game thread. Your other posts make sense now.
Click to expand...
I see lots of attacking of a poster here, and not the actual ‘non-sense, silly, childish, irrelevant’ argument that should, in theory based on the above, be very easy to refute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miamipuck and haveandare
Nopuckluck said:
Why would you be part of a fan forum to legitimately post nonsense just to anger as many people as possible. We come here to debate our team and you come to make silly childish arguments that are completely irrelevant to sports.

I actually believe I’m starting to figure you out. I see you post in s video game thread. Your other posts make sense now.
Click to expand...
You thinking science is nonsense. I'm shocked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miamipuck
Nopuckluck said:
Why would you be part of a fan forum to legitimately post nonsense just to anger as many people as possible. We come here to debate our team and you come to make silly childish arguments that are completely irrelevant to sports.

I actually believe I’m starting to figure you out. I see you post in s video game thread. Your other posts make sense now.
Click to expand...

Your concerns over childish arguments would be a lot more valid if one of your most famous arguments against players wasn't based entirely on the player's nationality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miamipuck, haveandare and Amazing Kreiderman
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom