Miamipuck
Al Swearengen
Jesus ****. What did I do today to piss everyone off?![]()
Haha, just another day at the office for you. lmao.
Jesus ****. What did I do today to piss everyone off?![]()
There really isn't.
There's a desire to make people realize that shot-attempts are a valuable tool in the toolbox. That's really it.
Dude all I did was make a joke spreadsheet and say I think Nash is playing well despite only having 1 goal and people are out here barkin.Haha, just another day at the office for you. lmao.
I mean, @Machinehead is an adult and can answer to his own opinions but I surely doubt he believes Kreider is "elite" only due to his shot attempt metrics. Also, I don't know if I've even seen Machinehead say that about Kreider. It's possible he did.I don't know man. I think everyone does agree with that.
This Kreider example is a perfect illustration of the issue. He's definitely not an elite player, but many want to push that he is because of that one area of his game, ignoring the overall results. I believe the motivation for this is a belief that the underlying numbers are suggesting there is more there, when the actual results are suggesting there isn't.
Dude all I did was make a joke spreadsheet and say I think Nash is playing well despite only having 1 goal and people are out here barkin.
People are passionate about what they believe in. A lot of people don't like Nash. A lot of people really like Pionk. Such is life.Man just keep it up, I love well thought out contra thinking. SO you have at least 1 in your corner. I think there may be 2 or 3 more.....hahaha
I think Nash is a touchier subject than Pionk. There's no middle ground with Nash.
There are elite face-off men. Are they elite players?
There are elite shot-blockers. Are they elite players?
If someone is to be described as an elite NHL forward, they are not 45 point players.
I'm unclear as to why this isn't a universal way of evaluation of the total player.
really dude?
Silverfish, the poster you just quoted.
The ghost of Liberace is haunting me. I was never mad at Silverfish.
I find it to be patently absurd to refer to Kreider as an elite NHL player.
I said others here feel otherwise, never meaning Silverfish. That was pretty clear in my post.
Dude.
I don't know man. I think everyone does agree with that.
This Kreider example is a perfect illustration of the issue. He's definitely not an elite player, but many want to push that he is because of that one area of his game, ignoring the overall results. I believe the motivation for this is a belief that the underlying numbers are suggesting there is more there, when the actual results are suggesting there isn't.
Kreider is an "intangibles" player (I think it's quite tangible, but work with me here) and it's backed up by numbers if you dig for them.
Callahan and Girardi were "intangibles" players who weren't backed up by anything tangible.
If Kreider was as loved as Callahan and Girardi were back in the day, I'd be a happy camper. But for some reason, we're actually harder on Kreider than the average player.
I get that, because he's a great athlete, but I think people are blinded by that to an extent.It's not as simple as love and not loved. Girardi was the warrior, couldn't play well but gave his all, Calalhan was more skilled than Girardi and gave his all as well. Kreider has more athletic ability than those 2 combined but he's perceived as taking shifts/games off. Therein lies the problem, people's perceptions.
You appreciate different things in players than others. I guess that's what makes the forum's go around. I agree with you for the most part, I was not a fan of Girardi's, Callahan I liked but not at 6mill a year and the nonsense at the end. Kreider is a damn good player but he does leave you wanting more and has since college and the WJC's.
I get that, because he's a great athlete, but I think people are blinded by that to an extent.
I'm not sure he has the hockey skills to give us more. Not a great shot, ok hands, bad passer. He's a good athlete and he makes it work.
The players that have the puck most often have to work the least.I think he's a much better passer than given credit and was proved later on in the year, his shot is fine. The funny thing is I don't doubt during the offseason there are many players working harder than him. It's weird that during games that never looks to be the case.
I know this isn't scientific evidence and could have been due to many factors, but the team playing well, then falling apart when Kreider got hurt, then playing relatively well compared to their talent when he got healthy again should point to the fact that maybe his impact on the team goes beyond goals and assists.
I just read some posts on page 1 of this thread. It's been 3 years and people here still repeat the same things about Chris.
What you saw is what you got. And it's been that way for 6 seasons.
I think with Kreider we keep hoping he puts it all together , it would be awesome if he does. With our luck if we trade him he would do it for someone else."Elite" is just a word. There's no official club.
Kreider is elite at corsi, I believe, because he's top 10 at that.
He's elite in front of the net. Some metrics literally have him at #1 at that.
He's an elite two-way winger in the sense that very, very few players bring his mix of possession, defense, board play, offense, and a physical edge.
As a total package, is he an "elite" NHL player? I would say no.
But I don't understand the issue. Nobody has ever said he's a Hall of Fame player. What we have said is that he brings to the table a package that few players offer and he makes this team much better just by showing up. That's the truth.
If you want a player that does what Kreider does and scores at an elite rate on top of that, there's literally three - Patrice Bergeron, Sean Couturier, and Alex Ovechkin. Sorry he isn't that.
It's not all that common, but some players do kick it up another notch comparatively later in their careers.Somehow every year seems like "well this will be the year Kreider is healthy and puts together that season we've been waiting for!"
I like Kreider a lot but it's funny how that's been the constant refrain for him. I don't blame him, just our expectations of him. That said I think he absolutely could hit 30 goals 60 points with a healthy season and linemates that also stay healthy, etc.
Will that be next year? I dunno, I'm afraid the team is gonna suck and it's always harder for players on struggling teams to produce as well as they're capable of.
BUt I do want Kreider to be one of the guys who sticks around