Rob Sense
Registered User
- Apr 26, 2015
- 2,550
- 3,189
then he won't make your team better at that price. It will be a first plus or a A or B+ prospect. Not NiemelaHe'd absolutely make the team better he's just not worth a 1st
then he won't make your team better at that price. It will be a first plus or a A or B+ prospect. Not NiemelaHe'd absolutely make the team better he's just not worth a 1st
Funny, there was an entire fan section crying that Chiarot had somehow intentionally taken out Tavares the way I remember it…
Chiarot is your best bet to help your team because
A - You’re a pretty soft team to play against, more so on the back end. After Muzzin there’s not much snarl, and you’ll need it when the officials put the whistles away.
B - He’s affordable. You guys don’t have much cap space - certainly not enough to go big game hunting - unless you’re planning to give up significant futures.
I prefer not helping the Leafs with anything, but don’t act like he wouldn’t help your blueline or that he’s spare parts. There’s a reason half a dozen teams have shown interest.
then he won't make your team better at that price. It will be a first plus or a A or B+ prospect. Not Niemela
Your trade:
Toronto 2022 1st (top 10 protected) + dumping Nick Ritchie for
Chairot at 50% + a 4th rounder (via Tampa).
Ok well if the habs were in similar position and had the chance to significantly upgrade a significant weakness (soft team, d who can be wore down) I don’t think Farrel plus a late first would be unreasonable. The Knies, Ritchie and first for Chairot @50% offer allows you to dump Ritchie who has another year left on his contract, and eats 50% of Chairots salary. I don’t think the upgrade from a 3rd to a 2nd last year (Knies) is that rich to pay for those cap benefits.The price hugues asked is a 1st and a 3rd. Dont think they gonna get more than what he asking for...
Niemela and 2nd pick = caufield or guhle + 2nd
Knies + 1st pick = farrell+ 1st
just be serious...
A -10 last playoffs!!!! Bad in every situation, except when paired with Weber, who made him look acceptable.
A -10 last playoffs!!!! Bad in every situation, except when paired with Weber, who made him look acceptable.
Well, a right handed guy to start. Braun, Pysyk, and Schenn are all better options. Mayfield, if he’s available.
Hell, if knowing how to play the position is optional and we want someone to park in front of the net and crosscheck guys there’s a 6’8” kid on the Marlies.
Do not want!! He takes .337 more penalties than he draws and even worse in the playoffs at .440
Leafs will be in the box way more killing penalties. And he is a penalty magnet in the playoffs....where we do not want to be shorthanded.
Do any of you look at his stats? Good grief, do not want!! Say it with me....do not want!
I haven't seen anything indicating them trading him. He is their first captain, they may want to keep him around if he's willing to sign.
"Some believe" wtf is that?
Ok well if the habs were in similar position and had the chance to significantly upgrade a significant weakness (soft team, d who can be wore down) I don’t think Farrel plus a late first would be unreasonable. The Knies, Ritchie and first for Chairot @50% offer allows you to dump Ritchie who has another year left on his contract, and eats 50% of Chairots salary. I don’t think the upgrade from a 3rd to a 2nd last year (Knies) is that rich to pay for those cap benefits.
Your first will be traded this year. You have 2 years after this one before Mathews likely bolts. You want to jeopardize making a run this year for potentially another Lilegren/Sandin type prospect?
I dont really believe there's interest in this -27 plug. Canadian Media with ownership in the Habs team trying to hype a big trade. Why? He's a 3rd pairing D that shoots left..
What if it’s both?As long as it's not a 1st or Knies, I'm okay with it