SlyIslands
Registered User
Advanced stats are good for puckmovers that will have high puck possession stats. Chiarot will be traded with 50% retained. A defensemen that can play 20 minutes at 1,75M$ is interesting to any team for the playoffs.
For me, if we get him (Leafs), I wouldn’t want to pay a 1st….not because “I want a great player cheap”, but because I don’t think he’s worth a 1st.
if Dubas is trading the 1st for D…then go big game hunting, not Chiarot….
Advanced stats are good for puckmovers that will have high puck possession stats. Chiarot will be traded with 50% retained. A defensemen that can play 20 minutes at 1,75M$ is interesting to any team for the playoffs.
If it was a 2nd+(nothing huge)…I would probably do that.I'm pretty sure a lot of GM's are going big game hunting as 1st priority. Of course teams would like to add Lindholm but only one team gets him (if he is traded). This is just another deadline where you pay more than you would like if you want to add targets for the playoffs.
If the shoe was on the other foot, I would be hesitant to pay the 1st for Chiarot as well (my price was always two 2nd's). But I would say no thank you, I rather keep my 1st. But there is a clear trend of posters who are spending a lot of energy trying to devalue what he brings.
If it was a 2nd+(nothing huge)…I would probably do that.
At his age, and with 3 more years left? I would still pass.
My opinion is this, if the Leafs are dealing a 1st(+) for a D upgrade…aim for Chychrun….23 years old and 3 more years at a very good cap hit.
you dont think he is worth a 1st but some GMS might. Your second point is if you have to give up a 1st you want a top dman, so the problem with this is a top dman cost a ton of MONEY + the seller knows he is a top dman so your 1st rounder better be a top 3 pick not a 20-25 pick plus your TOP PROSPECT and that will HURT YOU BAD, you wont like that part AT ALL. So its all about the best you can afford, RIGHT? all while NOT being outbid, RIGHT?For me, if we get him (Leafs), I wouldn’t want to pay a 1st….not because “I want a great player cheap”, but because I don’t think he’s worth a 1st.
if Dubas is trading the 1st for D…then go big game hunting, not Chiarot….
It’s not anything to do with who he plays for at all. He literally showed you stats from Winnipeg as well to show his impact isn’t good. For the record I could care less which team the leafs trade with so long as they improve the team. I just don’t think Chiarot is an improvement on almost any leaf defensemen at the moment, even if he gives some fans the warm fuzzies over how much he cross checks.The problem is the attitude and knee jerk reaction. The post he replied to was about numbers about Muzzin and he thought it was about Chiarot where I cherry picked stats. Comical.
But go ahead, defend your fellow Leafs fan (or Non Habs fan) and ignore reports from the media and think that the GM's interested in Chiarot are idiots.
Well I mean all the numbers above those points pretty near demolish any response anyways lolYes all these points at the end to make sure you can't reply, he obviously doesn't want an answer
you dont think he is worth a 1st but some GMS might. Your second point is if you have to give up a 1st you want a top dman, so the problem with this is a top dman cost a ton of MONEY + the seller knows he is a top dman so your 1st rounder better be a top 3 pick not a 20-25 pick plus your TOP PROSPECT and that will HURT YOU BAD, you wont like that part AT ALL. So its all about the best you can afford, RIGHT? all while NOT being outbid, RIGHT?
Rielly is covered by Kessel’s cap hit coming off the books, and the cap going up 1.2 fyi. There’s only 2-300k in the difference there.Obviously, Chychrun would be ideal but that's going to cost a lot more than just a 1st. Not sure the Leafs can outbid other teams and the Coyotes appear to be looking for a gold mine. Basically dangling a value contract and hoping for a hit. Be honest, if the Habs had Chychrun and we were asking for a gold mine like the Coyotes, I just wonder what the reaction and comments would be? My hunch tells me his game is targeted and the "he's only signed for 3 more years, then UFA" is a focus by many.
As far as Petry. The age and AAV is not ideal but he is lean for his body size and his skating is still top notch. His struggles this year is not about decline IMO but feel free to dissagree. There was something off between Ducharme and Petry and his game has come back with MSL.
The question I have with the Leafs if cap space for next year? 14 players signed with $8.7M in cap space and Campbell has to be signed right? Going to have to move out Mrazek and Kerfoot? Not sure you can afford to bring in anybody with a $4M+ AAV hit at this stage. That's basically the cost to extending Rielly
Not really, it just show that he's a defensive dmenWell I mean all the numbers above those points pretty near demolish any response anyways lol
It’s not anything to do with who he plays for at all. He literally showed you stats from Winnipeg as well to show his impact isn’t good. For the record I could care less which team the leafs trade with so long as they improve the team. I just don’t think Chiarot is an improvement on almost any leaf defensemen at the moment, even if he gives some fans the warm fuzzies over how much he cross checks.
The reports all said that the ASK is a first rounder. Nobody said he 100% is getting a first rounder. If someone pony’s up a first rounder he’s gone in an instant. Nobody has been desperate enough to do that though so he remains in Montreal.
Just not a very good one.Not really, it just show that he's a defensive dmen
I don’t need to dig at anything. The numbers were already posted for you. He has a negative influence on everyone he plays with. Maturity hasn’t improved his game at all, he’s the same player then as he is now, the stats show that.Comparing stats to the Jets with Chiarot is like comparing stats with Petry from his Oilers days. Maturity has improved their games but if that's what you value, all the power to you. It would be similar to comparing Campbell with the Kings who was a back-up and blocked from more ice time/opportunity
Keep digging
Well I don't agree, I think he's been great since the last half of his first year with the Habs. Edmundson was seen as a terrible player but was great last year.Just not a very good one.
It’s not anything to do with who he plays for at all. He literally showed you stats from Winnipeg as well to show his impact isn’t good. For the record I could care less which team the leafs trade with so long as they improve the team. I just don’t think Chiarot is an improvement on almost any leaf defensemen at the moment, even if he gives some fans the warm fuzzies over how much he cross checks.
The reports all said that the ASK is a first rounder. Nobody said he 100% is getting a first rounder. If someone pony’s up a first rounder he’s gone in an instant. Nobody has been desperate enough to do that though so he remains in Montreal.
Good luck with that. It’s literally been asks all along. ‘The market is ____’ = they’re asking for a first.Ok well that some strange logic. 1 month to go and you have not heard anybody offer a 1st. WHY on earth would anybody say in public what they have offered and show ALL their cards with 1 month to go. " desperate" well is that not self serving, wow. So desperate meaning not worth the 1st, RIGHT? This again is YOUR personal opinion and not 30 NHL GM's Lastly a lot of sports reporters have already predicted a 1st, have you not been watching tv At all.
Why not just wait the month to see the TRUTH of the MARKET.
Disagree. Lyubushkin is a bottom pairing type that is age 27 with 181 NHL games. Plays 15-18 min a game. Your undervaluing Kulak and overvaluing Lyubushkin. They are very similar and they are not comparable to Chiarot who is a legit top 4D and plays 23-25 min a game. Certainly not comparable to Bogosian who's skating is not as good as any of them. I will say it might be an upgrade on Bogosian in terms of the style of game the Leafs want to play.
Maybe Lyubushkin is slightly better than Kulak? Maybe but he's much closer to Kulak than he is to Chiarot.
My easy answer is if Chiarot costs a 1st, I would walk away. If another GM pays that, all good.you dont think he is worth a 1st but some GMS might. Your second point is if you have to give up a 1st you want a top dman, so the problem with this is a top dman cost a ton of MONEY + the seller knows he is a top dman so your 1st rounder better be a top 3 pick not a 20-25 pick plus your TOP PROSPECT and that will HURT YOU BAD, you wont like that part AT ALL. So its all about the best you can afford, RIGHT? all while NOT being outbid, RIGHT?
In case you didn't notice, the post you replied to was numbers on Muzzin. There was no cherry picked narrative. The funny part is you ignored the Muzzin value numbers and said I cherry picked stats and then you went on to cherry pick stats of your own. Comical.
So do you think several GM's that are interested in Chiarot are idiots and you know better? I think your guilty of deflating Chiarot due to the 1st narrative.... but your not the only one.
Don't reply to my posts please. Your attitude is off the rails and I have no more time for you're inability to have a respectful conversation.
If you go back and re-read the post you quoted you'll notice that I never said anything about value so I don't know where thats coming from , I was just pointing out the differences in their style of play , for example Kulak will never be mistaken for a hard hitting , stay at home defensive defenseman and I wasn't comparing Lyubushkin to chiarot or Bogosian , I was just pointing out that he is MORE comparable to those guys than he is to defensemen like Kulak .Disagree. Lyubushkin is a bottom pairing type that is age 27 with 181 NHL games. Plays 15-18 min a game. Your undervaluing Kulak and overvaluing Lyubushkin. They are very similar and they are not comparable to Chiarot who is a legit top 4D and plays 23-25 min a game. Certainly not comparable to Bogosian who's skating is not as good as any of them. I will say it might be an upgrade on Bogosian in terms of the style of game the Leafs want to play.
Maybe Lyubushkin is slightly better than Kulak? Maybe but he's much closer to Kulak than he is to Chiarot.
Actually, although I think Chiarot will improve Leafs but doubt he moves the needle enough. Toronto needs to make big improvement at deadline. Playoffs is going to be tough in East. They likely playing Tampa in first round, then either or Florida or Boston followed by possibly the Canes. That's a tough gauntlet to run. All three, Tampa and Florida both likely to improve at deadline.
Chychrun probably I would go for. Will take your top 2 prospects, a first pick, plus young player like a Sandin or Liljegren. But gives you a shot at a cup plus 3 more years at 4.6 million. Trade a big forward contract over the summer to restock your farm.
Muzzin use his LTIR caproom to do it. I doubt he will be same for some time. Althought he will be back for playoffs most players concussed like him takes quite a bit of time before they are themselves. Likely looking at next season, more so another season after that.
I'll be cheeering for the Leafs this playoff. Rather see a Canadian team get chance at a Cup than a USA team like Tampa again or Boston. Good Luck!!
Pretty fair comparison IMOIf you go back and re-read the post you quoted you'll notice that I never said anything about value so I don't know where thats coming from , I was just pointing out the differences in their style of play , for example Kulak will never be mistaken for a hard hitting , stay at home defensive defenseman and I wasn't comparing Lyubushkin to chiarot or Bogosian , I was just pointing out that he is MORE comparable to those guys than he is to defensemen like Kulak .