Correct. We'll have MLB style occurrences where CHLers have NCAA commitments and then sign ELCs after being drafted and forego the NCAA. Happens in baseball all the time with guys drafted out of HS (who have NCAA commitments as fall back options) and then just sign right after being drafted. Difference is baseball players have to choose whether to sign or not or else the team that drafted them loses their rights, whereas in hockey, they keep their rights for 4 years.I assume players who've signed their ELC can't make the move from the CHL to the NCAA right?
It's pretty clear who does and does not drive the bus in the NHLPA when you look at ELC Max, NHL Min, and ELC Minor League limit and how stagnant they've been relative to salaries at large.If I was the CHL commissioner, in addition to things that I could directly negotiate I would also be pushing the NHL to increase the compensation for ELC players by a significant amount, to get them to sign ELC's as soon as possible. Probably the NHL understands that it's going to have to make AHL life a little more financially appealing for guys on ELC's now that NIL is becoming more established.
They ought to tie ELC comp to a % of cap.It's pretty clear who does and does not drive the bus in the NHLPA when you look at ELC Max, NHL Min, and ELC Minor League limit and how stagnant they've been relative to salaries at large.
05-06- recent 1st overall pick Sidney Crosby enters the league on a 850k base, 3.7 Max bonus cap hit - 2.2 and 9.5% of the 39m cap respectively
2024-25- recent 1st overall pick Macklin Celebrini enters the league on a 950k base, 4.475 max bonus cap hit - 1.1 and 5.1 % of the 88m cap respectively.
Signing bonuses are capped at 10% of base.
Minors salary only went from 62.5k to 85k, league minimum from 450 to 775.
You'd think- but more ELC means less money for the voting members, and less of a crutch for GM's tp build their teams.They ought to tie ELC comp to a % of cap.
I'm quite aware of this. However, NIL might act as an impetus to force some increases.It's pretty clear who does and does not drive the bus in the NHLPA when you look at ELC Max, NHL Min, and ELC Minor League limit and how stagnant they've been relative to salaries at large.
05-06- recent 1st overall pick Sidney Crosby enters the league on a 850k base, 3.7 Max bonus cap hit - 2.2 and 9.5% of the 39m cap respectively
2024-25- recent 1st overall pick Macklin Celebrini enters the league on a 950k base, 4.475 max bonus cap hit - 1.1 and 5.1 % of the 88m cap respectively.
Signing bonuses are capped at 10% of base.
Minors salary only went from 62.5k to 85k, league minimum from 450 to 775.
The new reality of recruiting out of the CHL.....the elite talent is to tempting to pass up but the culture and mindset is different and defections to the pros is real.
Raising the cap for minor league compensation only means less money for the owners, as it doesn't count on the NHL cap. And a say 500K salary to a couple of NCAA signees in the AHL is pocket change to most owners.You'd think- but more ELC means less money for the voting members, and less of a crutch for GM's tp build their teams.
Really the only incentive to change it would be if it gets too low and starts impairing recruitment, more guys waiting to be redrafted/ go UFA because the minors money/ signing bonus isnt worth it
That’s still going to be the case for a lot of players. We just saw battaglia and Walton sign ELC’s a month or so ago. Luca Marrelli signed his ELC not too long ago as well. These are just off the top of my head. Some guys will definitely go ncaa though, and you will see more OA eligible players who are NHL drafted and undersized like Misa and Romani, but many OA’s will stay in the OHL as well.Was mostly Corso saying players goal was to sign an ELC as quickly as possible and wouldn't leave their junior team because they made friends.
You will see a lot of players use the threat of ncaa and even committing to schools as a ploy to get themselves traded out of situations they don’t like.There's always been attrition of 19-turning-20 year olds who decide to get their schooling underway (or are just done with junior hockey) instead of returning for their overage year or dropping down to Jr. A, but now there's another, more attractive than USports or Jr. A, avenue for those players if they like what an NCAA team is telling them.
I think the player's and his CHL team's situation are going to be big factors as well. We may see players leave teams that are going to be bad but be more willing to stay if the team is going to be good.
That's why it's important to remember that most of these older CHL players aren't moving to the NCAA as NHL prospects if they haven't already been drafted. I would wager that if the NCAA wasn't an option, most would be back for an OA year.
Not saying that is the case with Spence but Erie is going to be BAD BAD for the next couple seasons. If he does end up signing and forgoing the NCAA, he's getting moved right away out of Erie.That’s still going to be the case for a lot of players. We just saw battaglia and Walton sign ELC’s a month or so ago. Luca Marrelli signed his ELC not too long ago as well. These are just off the top of my head. Some guys will definitely go ncaa though, and you will see more OA eligible players who are NHL drafted and undersized like Misa and Romani, but many OA’s will stay in the OHL as well.
You will see a lot of players use the threat of ncaa and even committing to schools as a ploy to get themselves traded out of situations they don’t like.
Yes , at what point does CHL start crying that their “ star “ players are heading to college ! This will hurt lot of teams competitiveness, attendance going forward . Then I wonder if Canadiens say why are USA kids on our teams when their Colleges are taking our best players . At the end I wouldn’t be shocked if everybody in Hockey would like to go back to old system .Not saying that is the case with Spence but Erie is going to be BAD BAD for the next couple seasons. If he does end up signing and forgoing the NCAA, he's getting moved right away out of Erie.
The CHL leadership probably won't. Reactionary fans will. But that's always going to be the case.Yes , at what point does CHL start crying that their “ star “ players are heading to college !
This will hurt lot of teams competitiveness, attendance going forward .
Again there's always going to be reactionary types. The leagues shouldn't worry about keeping them happy.Then I wonder if Canadiens say why are USA kids on our teams why are USA kids on our teams when their Colleges are taking our best players