Hawkaholic
Registered User
Means nothing really.i believe that the retention on rantanen is now the current highest single dollar value salary retention in the league.
Means nothing really.i believe that the retention on rantanen is now the current highest single dollar value salary retention in the league.
well it means exactly what it says actually.Means nothing really.
Agreed, people are fixated on the round. Saying they could have got a 3rd for Hall with 50% retention. Claiming they retain more but still only got a 3rd.Hawks getting an "F" from Athletic or whatever just feels goofy. They essentially traded Hall and a retention spot I doubt they'd fill otherwise for a high 3rd. Give them like a C- or something if you think they didn't maximize value or whatever but an "F" as though they just dumped a franchise cornerstone for salary cap relief is just being nonsensical.
and the leafs were much closer to winningAlso I cannot imagine paying this guy 14 million. He’s not that type of player, he’s a very good player, he’s not worth that much.
No need to start the internal cap of this team at a number so high and for an outsider. Leafs did the same exact thing.
you could answer this question with historical hit rates on the picks, its probably close to indifferent but someone did mention the strategical value of having your own 3rd for OS possibility, the trade just probably doesn't matter much other than its eating up a retainment spot until the end of year so they cant retain on anyone else if they plan to with JonesThere are examples of teams being paid a pick to retain on players at the TD. It's typically a 4th or 5th round pick. Would people prefer we get a late 3rd and a 5th in this deal? Or our own 3rd back? Answer is pretty clear to me.
Yeah, I'd love to add an elite player like that to play with Bedard... but Rantanen just isn't a timeline fit, nor is he worth $14M.Also I cannot imagine paying this guy 14 million. He’s not that type of player, he’s a very good player, he’s not worth that much.
No need to start the internal cap of this team at a number so high and for an outsider. Leafs did the same exact thing.
i believe that the retention on rantanen is now the current highest single dollar value salary retention in the league.
Mouser lays out the money. Obviously not all retention is the same.There are examples of teams being paid a pick to retain on players at the TD. It's typically a 4th or 5th round pick. Would people prefer we get a late 3rd and a 5th in this deal? Or our own 3rd back? Answer is pretty clear to me.
you could answer this question with historical hit rates on the picks, its probably close to indifferent but someone did mention the strategical value of having your own 3rd for OS possibility, the trade just probably doesn't matter much other than its eating up a retainment spot until the end of year so they cant retain on anyone else if they plan to with Jones
Honestly, what he’s able to accomplish without MacKinnon these next 4-5 months will dictate a lot for how he’s perceived on the open market imoAlso I cannot imagine paying this guy 14 million. He’s not that type of player, he’s a very good player, he’s not worth that much.
No need to start the internal cap of this team at a number so high and for an outsider. Leafs did the same exact thing.
Yeah.. he’s not exactly a 200 foot player. His defense is bad. Effort seems inconsistent, but boy can he scoreHonestly, what he’s able to accomplish without MacKinnon these next 4-5 months will dictate a lot for how he’s perceived on the open market imo
Nothing like the x warriorsWhy is this board so out of touch with reality? People on X get it but here it’s all roses and butterflies, Davidson does nothing wrong and any criticism of him is frowned upon, the warriors come out in full force to stick up for him.
i meant cap hit, but i'm working off of old info.Depends on how you phrase it. Chicago is retaining $1.26M in real dollars for Rantanen.
- San Jose is retaining $1.43M on Eriksson this season and $3.6M total through 2027.
- San Jose is retaining $1.75M on Hertl this season and $8M total through 2030.
just stay on xitterWhy is this board so out of touch with reality? People on X get it but here it’s all roses and butterflies, Davidson does nothing wrong and any criticism of him is frowned upon, the warriors come out in full force to stick up for him.
Which means nothingwell it means exactly what it says actually.
Ya, exactly. Not to mention, they could have just went to another team to do the retention and we get nothing at all, and then have trouble trading Hall for anything half decent anyway.Mouser lays out the money. Obviously not all retention is the same.
Why is this board so out of touch with reality? People on X get it but here it’s all roses and butterflies, Davidson does nothing wrong and any criticism of him is frowned upon, the warriors come out in full force to stick up for him.
Hope you’re not talking about me, Mr. Wilson. My heart is yours.I added the ones I did to the ignore list because they were completely clogging up and ruining the game day threads. They are much more enjoyable and less frustrating now
Believe it's called Twitter.Why is this board so out of touch with reality? People on X get it but here it’s all roses and butterflies, Davidson does nothing wrong and any criticism of him is frowned upon, the warriors come out in full force to stick up for him.
ah yeah ufa is after the draftWouldn't matter, any offer sheet this summer is after the draft and uses 2026 picks.
Matthews might be the blue print for what guys start to do, not the McDavid route, but suppose it depends on the player and their personality/preferencesGood riddance to Hall. Pick #65 for him is fine with me, all it costs is Wirtz's money. We get a pick in the 60's for a completely irrelevant player no longer being on our team and blocking a spot for a kid that's hopefully a part of the future.
Hard pass on Rantanen, for $13+million do any of you really think he's going to be a 90+ point player for any significant portion of that deal? Especially 3-5 years from now when he's in his mid-30's and we're hopefully chasing Cups. No thank you. Draft this Misa kid and hope for the best instead.
People aren't going to like Bedard's next contract more likely than not but I'd bet we see a transition in how these NHLers get paid where their RFA deals are really their "mega" contract. Then when they re-up in their late 20's early 30's they're taking more reasonable deals. We learned with our own dynasty players that it makes absolutely zero sense to pay an inflated rate for a player's worst years. And again if we're going to fork that sort of money over for someone entering their 30's it's Kaprizov or bust for me, personally.
Yep... in other words a good trade. Hall has good wheels but seldom used it n Chicago..... and stone hands. Can't expect anything better for him. Now it is up to the scouts to find a hidden gem.It's pretty much an early 3rd for Hall.
Meh.
Opens up a roster spot for a kid, I guess.