aufheben
#Norris4Fox
New mini-series on Netflix The Queen’s Gambit detailing the story of a female chess prodigy as she struggles throughout her life with addiction, mental illness, genius, trauma, sexism, and ambition.
New mini-series on Netflix The Queen’s Gambit detailing the story of a female chess prodigy as she struggles throughout her life with addiction, mental illness, genius, trauma, sexism, and ambition.
It’s very true to the game. And the actress is awesome.It's on my list!
Apparently the reviews have been very good so far as well. And they hired Kasparov to choreograph the chess games and make sure it stays true to the game. Something I appreciate very much; most times a chessboard shows up in a show or movie, it's set up wrong or in a nonsense position.
Just waiting for the gf to decide whether she wants to watch it me, but I'll be digging into it soon!
One of my favorite openings, the Halloween Gambit #YOLO
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5?! Nxe5 5. d4 Ng6 6. e5
View attachment 374677
I bet it’s fine for white at lower levels. Catches your opponent off guard. Castle queenside, now we’re getting nice and weird.I read an article on this opening a while back. It's obviously not good for white, but it's still been played at the GM level like a couple dozen times!
I bet it’s fine for white at lower levels. Catches your opponent off guard. Castle queenside, now we’re getting nice and weird.
This is against 1700 computer:
View attachment 374892
Trick or treat, man, trick or treat.That is a crushing attack!
I'd say it would be fine at lower levels too. There's something about drastic gambits like that, that mess with the other player's mind. They start feeling like they have to convert and push a bit too hard.
If you come in with it well-prepared, I bet you'd catch people falling into similar traps.
The King’s Gambit. Honestly I don’t see a lot of people play that these days.My favorite gambit is 1. e4 e5 2. f4.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Rank Name Title Country Rating Games B-Year 1 Kasparov, Garry g RUS 2812 0 1963 2 Anand, Viswanathan g IND 2788 18 1969 3 Topalov, Veselin g BUL 2788 10 1975 4 Leko, Peter g HUN 2763 0 1979 5 Ivanchuk, Vassily g UKR 2752 25 1969 6 Kramnik, Vladimir g RUS 2744 12 1975 7 Svidler, Peter g RUS 2738 26 1976 8 Polgar, Judit g HUN 2735 10 1976
Is it just me or do the picture and the headline not go together?
![]()
Polish Player Suspected Of Cheating Gets 2-Year Ban
No, that's right. I read the article this morning; she was pretty blatantly cheating using a second phone.
I meant that she's happy in the photo.
It was very politically correct for the political climate of our time, female empowerment and all that political crap that is forced into a story (I wrote political three times, that's how ridiculous I think the movie climate has become), but in this case I didn't mind it at all. Because they put it in the right setting and didn't overblow it at all. The story came first, so it was great to watch. The growth of the character, the respect of chess, the molding of quirks from different grand masters in a main protagonist, I can absolutely not complain. I'm usually so against politically correct series (because they drown the story in their message), but in this case I have to applaud it. It was a joy to watch. It was done the right way and it was splendid. She wasn't a Mary Sue. She had to grow and overcome herself. That seems to be a difficult recipe for Hollywood to learn.New mini-series on Netflix The Queen’s Gambit detailing the story of a female chess prodigy as she struggles throughout her life with addiction, mental illness, genius, trauma, sexism, and ambition.
New mini-series on Netflix The Queen’s Gambit detailing the story of a female chess prodigy as she struggles throughout her life with addiction, mental illness, genius, trauma, sexism, and ambition.
1 | Carlsen | ![]() | 29 | ![]() | |||
2 | Caruana | ![]() | 28 | ![]() | |||
3 | Ding Liren | ![]() | 28 | ![]() | |||
4 | Nepomniachtchi | ![]() | 30 | ![]() | |||
5 | Vachier-Lagrave | ![]() | 30 | ![]() | |||
6 | Aronian | ![]() | 38 | ![]() | |||
7 | Grischuk | ![]() | 37 | ![]() | |||
8 | Mamedyarov | ![]() | 35 | ![]() | |||
9 | So |
I would add...It was very politically correct for the political climate of our time, female empowerment and all that political crap that is forced into a story (I wrote political three times, that's how ridiculous I think the movie climate has become), but in this case I didn't mind it at all. Because they put it in the right setting and didn't overblow it at all. The story came first, so it was great to watch. The growth of the character, the respect of chess, the molding of quirks from different grand masters in a main protagonist, I can absolutely not complain. I'm usually so against politically correct series (because they drown the story in their message), but in this case I have to applaud it. It was a joy to watch. It was done the right way and it was splendid. She wasn't a Mary Sue. She had to grow and overcome herself. That seems to be a difficult recipe for Hollywood to learn.
It's one of the best TV series I've ever seen IMO.
Anyway:
If you want to become great at chess, you need to be able to play blind chess. That will bolster your skill like mad. Then you can hard calculate any position and see any position better. But I'm lazy, I don't burn for chess. I was more promising in my youth, now I just play for fun, because now I just see chess as a fun game with no randomness. Join a club if you want to become better, you will learn so much from that and get to know other chess players. They're usually quirky, but smart. And you will gain perspective.
My biggest tip for anyone wanting to become really good at chess:
1) learn the annotations of course.
2) learn to visualize the board in your mind and keep practicing at that. That will also help you in other ways you cannot imagine. Your brain will develop. You will learn strategy, tactics and to handle small problems before they become big in this circus we work in as well. Even without blind chess it helps to be good at chess, to gain perceptiveness and compare.
3) Join a club. Trust me on that. They all have their flaws as persons. So do you. But you will learn from them.
I'm about a 1900 btw. I don't strive for excellence, but I think I know the game pretty well.
She kept running to the bathroom after every move - and she can't even blame it on prostate issues. At a high end tournament, I'm surprised she was allowed to (continually) leave the board on her move.No, that's right. I read the article this morning; she was pretty blatantly cheating using a second phone.
I just wish the tournament play was more realistic during the series. Having said that, it would make for boring TV.Thankfully this wasn't a huge part of the story. A few times this was brought up but it was an appropriate amount. If this was a huge storyline I'd be extremely annoyed since I'm not trying to watch a political drama. The fact that they mentioned it though shows how people eat that shit up nowadays.
Anyway, great series. I really enjoyed it.
I play the Grunfeld, too. Provides a dynamic game with lots of drawing opportunities for black.There’s a million Indian defenses alone. King’s, Queen’s, Grunfeld, Neo-Grunfeld, Nimzo-Indian, Bogo-Indian, Old Indian, East Indian, Benoni, Modern Defense. Then the Slav, Semi-Slav, and Ragozin are really popular too.
I like to play the Grunfeld as black. The Slav and Nimzo-Indian are annoying as white.
Didn't Magnus say besides AlphaZero, Dubov was one of the few players he felt he could learn from?Gotta love him. And that's a crazy game! I missed that tourney and hadn't seen that article.