Proposal: - CGY and DAL | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Proposal: CGY and DAL

I couldn't personally sign off on trading Robertson for this, but damned does OP know how to sell water in the desert.

If only Andersson had 2-3 years left on the deal. Ultimately Stars probably need RHD on term with decent cap hit + upside and a better first or another pick or two.
 
Last edited:
Think I suggested Andersson at 50% with an extension in place and Calgary’s 2026 1st with some protection for Robertson with an extension. If Dallas is throwing in Bourque, you could look at adding a name like Farabee or Frost, unless Dallas really wants a Coleman or a Backlund retained.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MakeCgyGreatAgain
Think I suggested Andersson at 50% with an extension in place and Calgary’s 2026 1st with some protection for Robertson with an extension. If Dallas is throwing in Bourque, you could look at adding a name like Farabee or Frost, unless Dallas really wants a Coleman or a Backlund retained.
Flames 2026 pick is untouchable.
 
The Flames are better off just getting prospects or picks for Andersson. At least then they’ll be with the team for a few years.

I also don’t see any way the Flames spend big on another winger. They need centres.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lanceuppercut75
Think I suggested Andersson at 50% with an extension in place and Calgary’s 2026 1st with some protection for Robertson with an extension. If Dallas is throwing in Bourque, you could look at adding a name like Farabee or Frost, unless Dallas really wants a Coleman or a Backlund retained.
Dallas needs to save cap, so throwing in the cap dump Farabee makes no sense.

Since the only reason to trade Robertson is to save cap, they would want cheaper players with term.

Anderson either a extension is the opposite of what they need.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad