Huh?And Marner at #2 with Kucherov at 9 and no Panarin or Caufield
Huh?And Marner at #2 with Kucherov at 9 and no Panarin or Caufield
Not sure if that's worse than not even including Panarin....Kucherov at 9 is certainly.....something.
Huh?
And Marner at #2 with Kucherov at 9 and no Panarin or Caufield
Journalism is dead.Are we sure the writer of the article didn't post this just to get people to read the shit article and then rage about it? Don't read the article is my suggestion.
Top 10, I might agree, but saying that he is the best is downright stupid.While I don't think it's valid to only look at points per game, I think in this case doing so gives a pretty good ranking actually.
#1 Kucherov 1.47
#2 Huberdeau 1.44
#3 Gaudreau 1.40
#4 Marner 1.35
#5 Kaprizov 1.33
#6 Panarin 1.28
#7 Tkachuk 1.27
#8 Rantanen 1.23
#9 Forsberg 1.22
#10 Kane 1.18
It's better than the list this guy got paid to do at least.
No wonder he took so little money from his new contract.This article was negotiated into Tkachuk's contract.
And Marner at #2 with Kucherov at 9 and no Panarin or Caufield
This... all of this true.If the writer posted this on this board, I think I'd be obligated to close the thread for trolling.
Everyone please take a moment to appreciate that your posts achieve a higher journalistic standard than CBS.
Peter Puck getting back in the game.CBS still does hockey ?