Confirmed with Link: CBJ Sign Dubinsky to 6 Year Extension

Jive Pawnbroker

One day next week
Feb 18, 2009
3,903
1,668
on SCTV
Thought you guys were a little tighter to the cap then what you seem to be. Also you have five pretty good NHL centers, and Boone Jenner is a center to if I'm not mistaken? Since Nikitins been traded, a RD would be pretty beneficia,l no? I think a base around Petry for Anismov is more then fair and would benefit both teams. Just my two cents.

The Jackets have more than enough NHL-caliber defensemen already on hand as is - they don't need to make a trade for one.

Wiz
Johnson
Tyutin
Murray
Savard
Prout
Erixon
Goloubef
 

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,842
4,445
The Hockey News ‏@TheHockeyNews 1m
Brandon Dubinsky signs a six-year, $35.1-million deal with Columbus – a contract @Proteautype says is an overpayment: http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/n...randon-dubinsky-is-a-significant-overpayment/

typically like Proteau, but I feel his arguement is really short sighted when most of the core is locked up long term already...

It does almost nothing to cause a long term cap issue. He wasn't going to sign for less than 5 mill at best so its 800k over that. As the cap rises it becomes less significant. If it is an issue, just cut 100k or so from 7 or 8 guys down the road.

I have played around with the cap looking out for the next 7 seasons or so. Assuming reasonable signings which so far I haven't been too far off on, reasonable bridge deals for the prospects and assuming that if a signed vet is traded, his replacement gets the same $, we don't appear to have a potential problem for 4 or 5 seasons and that I believe is only a one year issue because HartnelL is done that year.
 

KJ Dangler

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
8,590
5,271
Columbus
The Hockey News ‏@TheHockeyNews 1m
Brandon Dubinsky signs a six-year, $35.1-million deal with Columbus – a contract @Proteautype says is an overpayment: http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/n...randon-dubinsky-is-a-significant-overpayment/

typically like Proteau, but I feel his arguement is really short sighted when most of the core is locked up long term already...
I replied to him, how is this a bad contract, Callahan just signed exact same contract, last 3 seasons point totals, 36, 31, and 54. Dubinsky last 3 seasons 50, 54, 54. Not to mention Dubinskys performance against Sid the kid in the playoffs.
 

ca5150

Registered User
Jul 17, 2006
2,863
18
Columbus, Ohio
I wouldn't hold your breath. At Jarmo's talk last night, someone asked the question. Jarmo responded that we didn't have one last year and did just fine. He reiterated that if one is named, it will be obvious who earned it. It may end up being Dubi, but I think we'll play at least another season without one. Just IMO. I think Jarmo is using it as a motivator, myself. Just dangling a carrot.

I'm sure Richards and Jarmo are on the same page, but Jarmo doesn't really have a say in if they have a captain or not, that's up to the coach.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
I replied to him, how is this a bad contract, Callahan just signed exact same contract, last 3 seasons point totals, 36, 31, and 54. Dubinsky last 3 seasons 50, 54, 54. Not to mention Dubinskys performance against Sid the kid in the playoffs.

5.8 for a non 20 goal scoring second line forward isn't exactly a good contract. We're obviously over-paying a bit for intangibles.
 

LetsGOJackets!!

Registered User
Mar 23, 2004
4,799
1,151
Columbus Ohio
this is true

5.8 for a non 20 goal scoring second line forward isn't exactly a good contract. We're obviously over-paying a bit for intangibles.

the key will be prospect development that allows Wennberg to centre the 2nd line and provide some goals, while Dubi centres the 3rd and shuts down the other teams top line.

5.8 is a lot of money, (but it's not my money so I am glad he is signed)
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,315
4,994
The Beach, FL
5.8 for a non 20 goal scoring second line forward isn't exactly a good contract. We're obviously over-paying a bit for intangibles.

i agree with you here, not necc the same narrative, but I'm happier about Dubi at 5.8 than I would be with Callahan at 5.8 or Dave Bolland at 5.5
 

IHeartZherdev*

Guest
the key will be prospect development that allows Wennberg to centre the 2nd line and provide some goals, while Dubi centres the 3rd and shuts down the other teams top line.

5.8 is a lot of money, (but it's not my money so I am glad he is signed)

Wennberg has nothing, NOTHING to do with any of this.

We were a playoff team without Wennberg last year. We can be a playoff team again without him. The key to Dubie's deal is NOT prospect development - this is a very, very fair contract for Dubinsky to forgo UFA, commit to the team long term, and bring his style of play and leadership to the team, as well as his point production.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
i agree with you here, not necc the same narrative, but I'm happier about Dubi at 5.8 than I would be with Callahan at 5.8 or Dave Bolland at 5.5

Faint praise. Callahan and Bolland's contracts are terrible. I think Dubi's deal is just plain good. Not a great price, but its an appropriate contract.
 

Jackets Woodchuck

Registered User
Dec 27, 2010
4,168
296
I am really liking the way Jarmo is building this team. Hopefully, he can get some more of the core signed long-term this offseason.
 

XLJ

Registered User
Jan 4, 2010
1,388
0
Columbus had to lock Dubi up. He has become a leader on this team. When you look at Callahan, Clarkson, Bolland deals..Dubinsky contract is fair. Dubinsky is a better player than those 3 right now.
 

wahsnairb

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
5,240
2,558
cannot stand when people ***** about being "overpaid" when a team is not up against the cap and when players mean different things to different teams.. Dubinsky for 7 more years is a great great thing at whatever hit you can afford.

Johansen
Jenner
Wennberg
Dubinsky

those are centers who will be in the system for a while now.. just awesome
 

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,649
15,879
Exurban Cbus
Wennberg has nothing, NOTHING to do with any of this.

We were a playoff team without Wennberg last year. We can be a playoff team again without him. The key to Dubie's deal is NOT prospect development - this is a very, very fair contract for Dubinsky to forgo UFA, commit to the team long term, and bring his style of play and leadership to the team, as well as his point production.

This. Tangibles, intangibles. Whatever. Keeps Dubi and keeps him fairly compensated. I don't feel like other things are needed to justify the deal.
 

Jive Pawnbroker

One day next week
Feb 18, 2009
3,903
1,668
on SCTV
I've never owned a jersey with a player's name on the back but I just might invest in one now. I am so happy Duby's a Jacket for the long term.
 

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,842
4,445
cannot stand when people ***** about being "overpaid" when a team is not up against the cap and when players mean different things to different teams.. Dubinsky for 7 more years is a great great thing at whatever hit you can afford.

Johansen
Jenner
Wennberg
Dubinsky

those are centers who will be in the system for a while now.. just awesome

No Anisimov? rut roh! :laugh:
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
cannot stand when people ***** about being "overpaid" when a team is not up against the cap and when players mean different things to different teams.. Dubinsky for 7 more years is a great great thing at whatever hit you can afford.

So sorry that people look at contracts analytically and that ruins your day (well, not really).

I'm glad he signed the extension, regardless of if it gives me pause or not.
 

wahsnairb

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
5,240
2,558
So sorry that people look at contracts analytically and that ruins your day (well, not really).

I'm glad he signed the extension, regardless of if it gives me pause or not.

Yes, it ruins my day when people don't share the same perspective I do ...... no need for your snide comment.

All I was saying is it's obnoxious TO ME when people who are not paying a player what they deem to be "extra" money complain that someone is "overpaid". If they aren't up against the cap and they want to give a player X amount of dollars because they think he is worth it for whatever reason(s) then what's the point in comparing it to other players and other situations and saying it's too much money?
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
All I was saying is it's obnoxious TO ME when people who are not paying a player what they deem to be "extra" money complain that someone is "overpaid".

I got your point. Certainly didn't need the 'to me" in all caps, there was nothing to suggest otherwise. Perhaps others get annoyed when they are looked down upon by looking at a situation and giving what they believe to be an honest assessment of the deal as a whole - taking their feelings of the player out of the equation?

This was not a particularly good deal and could influence other deals down the road, even more-so since we aren't likely to be a cap team.

You can love the player but not their contract. You should be able to do that without ridicule.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad