RHD
Corson Ceulemans: Ceulemans really looked to push the tempo, which was nice to see. He was really active in transition leading rushes, though he didn’t always make a play after entry (which is a pretty common outcome for him because he’s not particularly creative). He was also his usual, physical self. More or less what you’d expect out of him on the whole.
C
Kent Johnson: Johnson played centre, so I was happy to see him in a different role than the one he played for the vast majority of his freshman year at Michigan. I thought he was really impressive even though it didn’t show up on the scoresheet a ton in the first two games (but he created five goals in the finale). He drew a couple of penalties dancing opposing players laterally. Under pressure, he made soft little plays through the triangles of sticks and into space for himself to skate onto that drew some wows from the crowd of scouts. He often looked like the craftiest, most confident handler on the ice. He was one of the best players on the ice in his second and third games.
C/LW
Cole Sillinger: Sillinger disappointed me a little in the first two games. There were some moments where his skill shone through or he was engaged physically, but I didn’t think he was much of a factor and he’s still got some work to do to fix his forward skating mechanics. But he was
outstandingin the closer, scoring
four (!) beautiful goals (including one from a one-timer in the high slot, another off a wrister in the low slot that cleanly beat Brett Brochu and one that he just exploded into the net).