If ownership was content to let the current roster play out and not make significant changes to it, then why on earth would they have let JD fire Jarmo and then push JD aside?
i've been banging this drum for months on this board.
anyone saying there shouldn't or won't be major changes to the roster seem to think that a completely new executive coming in to oversee the roster should/will be content to simply continue building jarmo's roster with jarmo's players.
they have valuable
assets but the value of many of those those assets is, at present
theoretical – guys who may one day be productive NHL contributors but aren't there yet, and development doesn't happen in a vacuum.
meanwhile, teams like florida have extracted
actual value by finding/signing and, more importantly, having meaningful roles available for undervalued scrap-heap players or change-of-scenery guys (verhaeghe, forsling, reinhart, montour).
building through the draft only truly works one of two ways:
- bridging between eras and/or supplementing an existing core (i.e. dallas)
- building around a small handful of superstars from the top of the draft (colorado, edmonton)
florida closed its "build through the draft" era and now only has a few drafted players – but many 'core' players – on its roster. barkov is their franchise player, ekblad is a low-end top pair defenseman, and lundell is a middle six forward… that's it. their other core guys (tkachuk, reinhart, montour, forsling) were acquired elsewhere.
The CBJ roster and prospect pool of 23-24 is not anything that you'd want your new GM to look at and say "stay the course". It's a collection of "maybes", "nots" and mediocres for the most part. The "sure things" are few and far between.
roster, yes. prospect pool… it's objectively a top-10 (and on most lists a top 5) system that's about to add a top-5 pick. and they have young roster players with talent.
but to the points above, the florida model (colorado too, to an extent) would be to convert some of that
theoretical value into
actual value by trading for guys who can be contributors on the top half of the roster with some untapped value. consolidation then opens up opportunities for bargain-bin RFA finds.
if the plan is to build
most of a roster through the draft, they're going to be stuck running in the hamster wheel and it'll never coalesce into a winner.