Well andys.... if you want to talk about reading the comment, maybe you should start by actually reading the comment?!? What I said.. was that he was "*ARGUABLY* the 2nd best forward in the Kings organization right now". Words are important... don't just leave one out to try to make a better argument.
I really don't think it's that crazy to make that argument given the context and what we saw from Vilardi this year. To me, it's way more crazy that you think a player like JAD (among others) is ABOVE Vilardi on the depth chart... I like JAD don't get me wrong... but he didn't do jack in his 4 NHL games and he basically has a full YEAR of development time/experience on Vilardi, who stepped in and immediately made an impact so much so that the Kings pretty much had to keep him up with the big club.
If I'm a GM building a team and I have to choose between a 20 year old Vilardi and a 35 year old Carter, I'm choosing Vilardi 10 times out of 10. And it's really not that close. That's coming from a guy who absolutely loves Carter, he's one of my favorite Kings players of all time. You realize Vilardi was a more productive player than Carter was this past season right?? Carter was on pace for a 37 point season in a full 82 games, while Vilardi was on pace for 42.
Players like Brown, Kempe, and Iafallo might have been more productive players for the Kings this year... but they also received significantly more ice time. Iafallo was getting around 19-20 minutes a night on average while Gabe was getting about 13 minutes a night. So you could legitimately make an argument for Vilardi over those players, especially assuming he gets a full summer of training (for the first time in like 2 years mind you) and is fully conditioned and ready for more ice time to start next season.
You can argue for other prospects like Turcotte and Kaliyev to be above Vilardi on a depth chart, but in doing so you're betting on potential, since neither one of those players has proved anything at an NHL level no matter how good they project to be. Vilardi has.
No one is saying Vilardi is "perfect"... no one is saying he doesn't have weaknesses/flaws and doesn't have things he can improve on. We don't just "think he's good because someone said he was" we think he's good because we literally saw him play... and his play in the NHL during those 10 games was very good at the very least. Obviously, his skating isn't great. Obviously he can improve defensively. Obviously, there's other areas where he can improve. But those weaknesses really didn't seem to be too much of an issue at the NHL level, and if anything that just makes the argument for Vilardi over most other Kings forwards even stronger. He has room to grow, he's going to get better.
Oh and here's another fun thing about Vilardi's 10 NHL games....... He basically DID replace Carter. And the team was significantly better. Now you can call that coincidence, and of course there's other factors, but that's basically what happened. Carter was out, Vilardi was in... and the team was on fire.
Also... Byfield isn't a part of the Kings organization right now so I'm not really sure why you included him in your list of players that are "better" than Vilardi.