How Carolina compares to a sample of how other successful teams approached it after making the playoffs the first time:
The Canes have amassed a volume of picks by (1) only dabbling in the rental market as a contender (2) not being afraid to trade players for futures (Skinner, Faulk, Nedeljkovic, Bean, DeAngelo) and (3) trading down regularly.
How is HF feeling about this strategy? The Canes continue to have a top half type prospect pool despite late 1st round records, based on volume. However, they routinely get bad grades at the deadline as their inaction is seen as preventing ultimate success.
Team | Years | R1 | R2 | R3 | SUM | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | SUM | TOTAL |
Pittsburgh | 07-11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 19 | 30 |
Boston | 08-12 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 18 | 31 |
Washington | 08-12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 22 | 34 |
Chicago | 09-13 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 23 | 43 |
Los Angeles | 10-14 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 22 | 34 |
St. Louis | 12-16 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 22 | 36 |
Tampa | 14-18 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 21 | 38 |
Toronto | 17-21 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 25 | 37 |
Colorado | 18-22 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 26 |
Carolina | 19-23 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 20 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 30 | 50 |
The Canes have amassed a volume of picks by (1) only dabbling in the rental market as a contender (2) not being afraid to trade players for futures (Skinner, Faulk, Nedeljkovic, Bean, DeAngelo) and (3) trading down regularly.
How is HF feeling about this strategy? The Canes continue to have a top half type prospect pool despite late 1st round records, based on volume. However, they routinely get bad grades at the deadline as their inaction is seen as preventing ultimate success.