Mogo
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2002
- 26,242
- 12,590
They literally did learn from Guentzel which is why this thread exists.
You dont trade for high end UFA's you hope to keep without a deal in place. Example. What Dallas did
They literally did learn from Guentzel which is why this thread exists.
Shrug would I have liked more moves yes am I agitated they didn't nope I had no expectations of this season other than a retool year. Some Canes fans seem to have drunk the koolaid.To be fair, Canes management is to blame to have put themselves in this situation in the first place.
Should have traded him faster.
Now they are weaker and their foes in the East almost all got stronger.
You dont trade for high end UFA's you hope to keep without a deal in place. Example. What Dallas did
You dont trade for high end UFA's you hope to keep without a deal in place. Example. What Dallas did
That’s a shallow-minded way to think about it.
Colorado didn’t allow for pre-negotiation of a deal. Understandably so — if the negotiation fails (which it did, in fact) then they’ve alerted the player and almost certainly created a media leak which means a circus for the rest of the season.
So Colorado was smart. They said “here’s what the price is, no talking to the player, take it or leave it.”
Carolina was faced with a dilemma: keep Necas who is the lesser player, at absolute maximum trade value during that window of time, already discontented, and leaving at the end of his contract — and just hope things work themselves out when you get a couple of 2nds at next year’s TDL? Or swing for a 50-goal 100-point star and sell the hell out of your program to try and re-sign him?
They took the swing, and made the hard pitch for an extension. As it turns out, the negotiation failed from the player’s side of the table. Most orgs would have just doubled down and hoped things somehow worked themselves out between now and UFA Day, with a miracle Cup run or a miracle reversal on the contract.
Tulsky (or if rumor is accurate, Dundon) said **** that, get some value for him. So they went back to market and got two 1sts and a young roster player — which is a LOT more than Necas would have pulled at next year’s TDL.
So they’ve effectively traded Necas with an extra year on his contract for a non-TDL return. In other words, a straight up hockey trade.
Was this the way they wanted it to play out, of course not. But it’s an example of how a team can take calculated risks on potentially franchise-altering opportunities, and still back their way down to an acceptable outcome as a Plan B/C/D. It’s messy but in the big picture it’s how thoughtful asset management works. You don’t just sit there waiting for perfect opportunities to appear out of nowhere… nor do you go out chasing every wild hare you come across. You wait for a risk that makes sense, and take it decisively. By the nature of how risk works, sometimes it plays out in your favor and sometimes it doesn’t.
The cup isn't awarded in March, anything is possible.Imagine they win the Cup and everyone else for the next three years decides they need to downgrade going into the playoffs?
There's a lot of overly pessimistic comments in this thread. Necas was a great player, but he wasn't a superstar. Rantanen did not work out, but the Canes still got a bunch of picks and Stankoven who has the potential to become a player as good as Necas at least.
It could have played out better for Carolina, but the end results are not as bad as people are making it out to be.![]()
Definitely surprised they didnt flip one of Dallas' 1sts to bring in someone else. Not a good look for Tulsky.
Jesperi Kotkaniemi looked an entire tier above Rantanen in his time here. The guy doesnt possess the character ODawg has in one pinky.Can you really say you downgrade when the guy you trade has done dick since he's been in town? Rantanen looked like shit in Carolina.
There was no time.Definitely surprised they didnt flip one of Dallas' 1sts to bring in someone else. Not a good look for Tulsky.
Mikko comes across as a miserable player.Tulsky has been open that Rantanen’s camp dragged out negotiations with the Stars until the last hour, which eliminated any possibility of flipping the 1sts for a meaningful player.
That was the plan but mikko the diva took too long to sign Dallas contact tying up the cap needed for a move that was apparently on the table.They could have bought with the assets acquired, like the other contenders did.
Yeah but it's reality.That's some Marc Bergevin type of excuse. That's rough.
No, The has no say in how a trade can be completeed outside of CBA rules, and having an extension isn't one of those. The reason the trade wasn't complete until an extension is because Dallas wouldn't commit the resources to the trade without an extension. The league had nothing to with it, it was 100% Mikko dragging his feet and holding both teams hostage until the last minute. Which just goes to show how the TDL is not the ideal place for this type of business, not with the impending timeline of 3pm. Too bad for Carolina though, they had to do it and go along with itYeah but it's reality.
Rantanen dragged his feet signing the contract extension with Dallas, which needed to happen in order for the league to close the trade and because the Canes had very little cap space after the initial Rantanen trade they couldn't do anything else because it would put them over the cap. They had other deals lined up, but those players got traded elsewhere before Rantanen signed and the deal closed.
This is a direct quote from Tulsky yesterday.
You are arguing semantics.No, The has no say in how a trade can be completeed outside of CBA rules, and having an extension isn't one of those. The reason the trade wasn't complete until an extension is because Dallas wouldn't commit the resources to the trade without an extension. The league had nothing to with it, it was 100% Mikko dragging his feet and holding both teams hostage until the last minute. Which just goes to show how the TDL is not the ideal place for this type of business, not with the impending timeline of 3pm. Too bad for Carolina though, they had to do it and go along with it
no its not semantics, the way you posed it suggests the league interfered with the trade.You are arguing semantics.
The trade wasn't going to close until he signed his contract extension, and without the trade closing the Canes were hamstrung due to the cap. Which is why the Canes were not able to flip those picks for other adds, which is the point my original comment was in reply to.
I was literally listing off the things that needed to happen before the league would deem the trade closed per the CBA and league policy. It's not interference when it's part of the stated process.no its not semantics, the way you posed it suggests the league interfered with the trade.
They didn't though. In terms of winning a cup this year they are clearly in a worse position with Stankoven and Hall than with Necas and Drury. They were in the best position with Rantanen.Today the Canes woke up in basically the same position they’d have been if they had never had Rantanen at all. Say what you will about Dundon, I get that he’s not popular in some circles, but a LOT and I mean a LOT of owners in this league would have sat by and let their GM “stick to his guns” with catastrophic consequences. This was a clear-cut case where someone needed to set things back on the right track.
Maybe if Dundon didn't run a shoestring operation they could've had more guys to run the phonesWouldn’t surprise me if the Dallas trade kept them so busy they didn’t really have a lot of time to make another deal. Also….after our rental trades we didn’t have many extra assets until Rants finally happened and I’m glad they didn’t impulse spend those picks.
This team doesn’t have it. Only make moves that last right now.