Confirmed Signing with Link: [CAR] F Seth Jarvis signs extension with the Hurricanes (8 years, $7.420087M AAV; deferred salary in 9th year)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
73,253
29,213
There's no guarantee investing the money will give you a locked in return. Yes the generic stock market has tended to return a certain amount on aggregate, but there is no guarantee on that and there is no guarantee future returns from the market will be the same as the past.

For example if you invested $5 million into a generic US index fund (SP500) on Dec 1, 2000, ten years later on Dec, 1, 2010 your $5 million would have have grown to basically nothing.

Whereas paying less tax in that case, say instead of paying a whopping 48% tax on all your income in that time, you could have changed that to 0-10% income tax by changing your residency and deferring payment during that time ... you'd have a lot more money.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
20,577
17,109
Bomoseen, Vermont
There's no guarantee investing the money will give you a locked in return. Yes the generic stock market has tended to return a certain amount on aggregate, but there is no guarantee on that and there is no guarantee future returns from the market will be the same as the past.

For example if you invested $5 million into a generic US index fund (SP500) on Dec 1, 2000, ten years later on Dec, 1, 2010 your $5 million would have have grown to basically nothing.

Whereas paying less tax in that case, say instead of paying a whopping 48% tax on all your income in that time, you could have changed that to 0-10% income tax by changing your residency and deferring payment during that time ... you'd have a lot more money.
I mean if you pick the 10 years that bookends with one of the largest recessions that is going to happen. 2010 to 2019 5M would turn into 17M if you reinvested the dividends.

Inflation from 2010 to 2019 would cost you about 860k in inflation. 17.8M you would have "lost" deferring the money. During that 9 year period if you use 5 million. I'm sure there are a million other ways to do things, people that do this for a living probably have way better ideas than me but when I look at it, thats how I see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrandBison

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
73,253
29,213
I mean if you pick the 10 years that bookends with one of the largest recessions that is going to happen. 2010 to 2019 5M would turn into 17M if you reinvested the dividends.

Inflation from 2010 to 2019 would cost you about 860k in inflation. 17.8M you would have "lost" deferring the money. During that 9 year period if you use 5 million. I'm sure there are a million other ways to do things, people that do this for a living probably have way better ideas than me but when I look at it, thats how I see it.

There's no guarantee the next 10 years will be exactly like the last 10 years. It could be the same as 2000-2010.

Paying 0% or 10% or 35 percent tax versus almost 50% tax though .... that's a guarantee of a shit ton more money in your pocket.

People were naive when they said Ohtani is giving away money ... he's really not. He's going to cash in those deferred salary payments at a much lower tax rate when he moves to a lower tax jurisdiction after retirement. There's actually some politicians in California who are upset about it.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
20,577
17,109
Bomoseen, Vermont
There's no guarantee the next 10 years will be exactly like the last 10 years. It could be the same as 2000-2010.

Paying 0% or 10% or 35 percent tax versus almost 50% tax though .... that's a guarantee of a shit ton more money in your pocket.

People were naive when they said Ohtani is giving away money ... he's really not. He's going to cash in those deferred salary payments at a much lower tax rate when he moves to a lower tax jurisdiction after retirement. There's actually some politicians in California who are upset about it.
Jarvis is going to be 31 and need another NHL deal I doubt he is changing residency for that. Maybe he is idk.

The money Ohtani has and the age, years, whatever.. yeah it makes way more sense for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
73,253
29,213
Jarvis is going to be 31 and need another NHL deal I doubt he is changing residency for that. Maybe he is idk.

The money Ohtani has and the age, years, whatever.. yeah it makes way more sense for him.

If Jarvis was like 38 or 40 when his 15.6 million pay out comes due and was retired, he could do something like setup residency in the Bahamas, only be required to stay in the Bahamas for 90 days/365 days for 1 year, spend the rest of the year in say Miami and Europe and bank that 15.6 million free of taxes and then live where ever he wants after that.

But I suspect even Jarvis will be looking to sign with a no state tax team for the 2032 season to be able to keep as much of that 15.6 million as possible.
 
Last edited:

Jyrki

Benning has been purged! VANmen!
May 24, 2011
13,587
2,841
溫哥華
There's no guarantee the next 10 years will be exactly like the last 10 years. It could be the same as 2000-2010.

Paying 0% or 10% or 35 percent tax versus almost 50% tax though .... that's a guarantee of a shit ton more money in your pocket.

People were naive when they said Ohtani is giving away money ... he's really not. He's going to cash in those deferred salary payments at a much lower tax rate when he moves to a lower tax jurisdiction after retirement. There's actually some politicians in California who are upset about it.
Deferred compensation is also fairly common for older employees in the corporate world, because it's pretty attractive for people who are eyeing retirement but have already maxed out their tax-free retirement investments. Even some government employers do it when they want to attract better workers but don't have extra money, instead they offer deferred leave where the employee can defer salary for them to have a paid sabbatical year, effectively getting a vacation that's worth the marginal tax savings from deferring paychecks.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,100
16,242
And here I thought that 8-year contracts last for 8 years, not 9.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,477
16,001
Sweden
Solid contract. Given that Lucas Raymond is rated as a tier below him one would expect Raymond’s contract to come in well below this one.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,667
28,152
Cary, NC
If Jarvis was like 38 or 40 when his 15.6 million pay out comes due and was retired, he could do something like setup residency in the Bahamas, only be required to stay in the Bahamas for 90 days/365 days for 1 year, spend the rest of the year in say Miami and Europe and bank that 15.6 million free of taxes and then live where ever he wants after that.

But I suspect even Jarvis will be looking to sign with a no state tax team for the 2032 season to be able to keep as much of that 15.6 million as possible.
There are rules around establishing residency. I don’t see how Jarvis can sign a UFA contract on July 1 2032, the day he gets his deferred bonus, and establish residency in the state of his UFA contract the same day.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
73,253
29,213
There are rules around establishing residency. I don’t see how Jarvis can sign a UFA contract on July 1 2032, the day he gets his deferred bonus, and establish residency in the state of his UFA contract the same day.

If he was retired, it probably wouldn't be that difficult for him to figure out how to get residency somewhere else if he really wanted to.

The problem for Jarvis is he'll still only be like 31 or 32 when this deal expires, if it took him to retirement age, then it would be a different story.
 

ottawah

Registered User
Jan 7, 2011
3,621
717
A big question for me is are deferred payments part of payouts for purposes in determining team spending. I strongly suspect it is. In which case, the players union should be absolutely against this. What in effect you are doing is allowing teams to go over the cap now, and that will come out of the players escrow in 9 years.

For all the talk of exceeding the cap, the truth is the cap that should matter to players the percentage of HRR they are allowed to. Anything that is "cap circumvention" (legal or otherwise) may allow certain (i.e. elite level players) to cash in, but eventually will come at the expense for the majority, and generally lesser well paid players, around the league.
 

GrandBison

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
2,028
2,366
In terms of cashflow, the only way it makes sense for Jarvis is that is money that the Canes didn't want to give him at first. Heavily front end contracts are always the best for the player and I don't see how this could become a trend.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,184
45,371
Uhhhh, this will be every contract from this point on for anyone who's remotely good

It won’t be.

1. You’ve got to get players to agree to the deferred payment. Most players want more money up front, not 9 years from now.

2. The Canes had to defer over $15 million to save 500k in cap space. That’s a lot of money you’re asking the player to postpone for a relatively small payoff.
 

GrandBison

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
2,028
2,366
There's no guarantee investing the money will give you a locked in return. Yes the generic stock market has tended to return a certain amount on aggregate, but there is no guarantee on that and there is no guarantee future returns from the market will be the same as the past.

For example if you invested $5 million into a generic US index fund (SP500) on Dec 1, 2000, ten years later on Dec, 1, 2010 your $5 million would have have grown to basically nothing.

Whereas paying less tax in that case, say instead of paying a whopping 48% tax on all your income in that time, you could have changed that to 0-10% income tax by changing your residency and deferring payment during that time ... you'd have a lot more money.
With the kind of money pro players have, it should not be uncommon that they beat the market. To defer a payment for 10 yrs is not ideal if you want to control your money. Tax laws and agreements could also change by that time.
 
Last edited:

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,053
100,782
Oh I'm sorry I didn't realise all the GMs took an IQ test, please post the results so I don't make the same mistake next time.
LOL. Lighten up Francis. The post was made in a light hearted manner and was referencing that Tulsky has a Bachelor of Arts in chemistry and physics from Harvard University and a PhD in chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley. He worked for two years in postdoctoral study at the Naval Research Laboratory, then worked in nanotechnology for ten years at Silicon Valley companies and he holds 27 US patents. The guy is generally known for how smart he is and NOT known for how good of a GM he is.

It's not a slight toward your GM. Everyone knows how good Zito and your team is currently the Stanley Cup Champs, so not sure why you take such offense to a light hearted statement like that, but whatever. Carry on.
 

Nico Hischier

Registered User
Nov 22, 2017
3,101
2,820
Is this contract going to stand or is it circumvention? I understand deferred payments is a legal seldom used move but I don’t understand how they can’t make it for the 9th year if contracts have a limit of 8 years. The only thing that makes sense if they did a 7 year contract and deferred the last signing bonus to the 8th year.
 

pld459666

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,090
8,352
Danbury, CT
Not sure if addressed, but in the unlikely event that the Carolina franchise folds, the deferred $$ becomes unsecured. Seth would be lucky to get 10 cents on the dollar.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,184
45,371
Is this contract going to stand or is it circumvention? I understand deferred payments is a legal seldom used move but I don’t understand how they can’t make it for the 9th year if contracts have a limit of 8 years. The only thing that makes sense if they did a 7 year contract and deferred the last signing bonus to the 8th year.

Tulsky checked with the NHL and NHLPA before making this kind of contract, so it’d be real funny if they suddenly decided to nullify it. Granted, it’s the NHL we’re talking about, so it’s not impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,184
45,371
Are the Canes the 1st team to do deferred monies owing??

Cold this be a real pandora's box for the rich teams???

Nope, the Coyotes did it with a Shane Doan contract way back when. It's always been available for many, many years.

It doesn't happen often (and probably won't happen again anytime soon) because most players want to get paid sooner, not 9 years from now.

It doesn't matter how rich a team is. Ultimately, it comes down to the player.
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,521
23,168
Nova Scotia
Visit site
Nope, the Coyotes did it with a Shane Doan contract way back when. It's always been available for many, many years.

It doesn't happen often (and probably won't happen again anytime soon) because most players want to get paid sooner, not 9 years from now.

It doesn't matter how rich a team is. Ultimately, it comes down to the player.
Agreed, the player holds that option. Thinking Doan did it pre cap era??

I do think the rich and better competative teams will be able to entice players to do this at some point.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad