I did not. That might reinforce the part about Pesce facing the best PP opponents. The Canes have been decent at scoring short-handed (Slavin himself had 2), but most of those come with one (or both) of Aho/Teraveinen on the ice, They are specifically used after the puck is cleared to create havoc as the other team tries to enter the zone.
The consensus view is that Carolina is good at analytics and RBA requires defensive accountability. So why would Pesce be first over the boards if Slavin is demonstrably better?
Counterpoints:
Last 3 years combined:
Slavin: 2:51 TOI/GP on the PK
Pesce: 2:31 TOI/GP on the PK
If the consensus view is that Carolina is good at analytics and RBA requires defensive account ability, then why is Rod playing Slavin more minutes on the PK than Pesce?
Secondly, it's about the pairing. Slavin's most common defensive partner on the PK is Burns, who is not as strong defensively as Pesce's partner Skjei, who is solid defensively.
Third, Over the past 3 seasons combined, Slavin has played 265 min on the PK with Staal. Pesce has played 257 minutes with Staal on the PK. So if Staal is the best PK forward against the toughest competition, how come Slavin has as much time as Pesce does with him. Sure, injuries come into play but it's not like Pesce is getting all the tough assignments with Staal.
Fourth, why did Carolina, who is analytically driven, sign an older Slavin to a long term deal and let Pesce go? (ok, I know this last one is a stretch).