Well....once he turned down the $12.6M AAV I'm sure the negotiations were rather short..
Yeah that quote is all over the placeSo Colorado showed little to no interest in attempting to re-sign him for several months, but this is also a panic move 6 weeks before the deadline?
Nah, you don't trade away a superstar like Rantanen to make room for Landeskog (who will never be at the level he was, if he even does play). Have to disagree with you on this one.I think Colorado sees that Landeskog has no intention of LTIRetiring and is going to play, and knew that there was no way to fit Rantanen under their cap at anywhere near the price that he wanted without parting with some major assets.
You'd think a guy with this many posts crying about the trade in this thread would know the full details of the trade at the very leastIf you believe the pro’s he really didn’t
Just more sounds like he was low balling him
For the crowd that say this was to extend the window for Colorado?
Mackinnon is 29y, 30y next season. Their window is the next 3-4 years. I don’t see how this trade helps that window at all, they didn’t gain any futures to use in the follow up trades and are lacking a franchise winger now
That was for sure part of the equation.Nah, you don't trade away a superstar like Rantanen to make room for Landeskog (who will never be at the level he was, if he even does play). Have to disagree with you on this one.
As was said, Strickland has no clue about the Avs, so this is just a non statementThis makes no sense lol wasn't he asking for a ridiculous pay-day ?
Read elsewhere that his previous contract negotiations had gone similar, that there was an offer early that he rejected, then no talk. Ended up getting hammered out right at the last minute.This makes no sense lol wasn't he asking for a ridiculous pay-day ?
Strickland is pretty notoriously just an idiot when it comes to Avs stuff -- and yeah, his quote contradicts itself. On the one hand, the Avs showed little interest in re-signing Rantanen, which indicates they've been contemplating this for a while, but on the other hand they were panicking. Lol. Also, why would they be panicking? We're not even close to the trade deadline.So Colorado showed little to no interest in attempting to re-sign him for several months, but this is also a panic move 6 weeks before the deadline?
Mikko had a 6 million salary this year. Let’s say they paid a little less than 3 million there. They also shed a cap dump making 5.25.Chicago paid 5 million for their own third back
Clown show
And costs nowhere near the same for the duration.But they traded Drury instead, who isn’t as good as KK…
He's actually starting to annoy me with this insistence that we don't appreciate Rantanen or something.You'd think a guy with this many posts crying about the trade in this thread would know the full details of the trade at the very least
Don't get me wrong, losing Rantanen is a gutting blow and sets them back, but...they were...? I don't think they were. They're a wildcard team right now that's been wildly all over the map in terms of consistency, have had consistent injury concerns and huge question marks for coming up on three years now (Landeskog, Nichushkin), and frankly just have never gotten back to the form of that cup winning team. They went all-in last deadline, Nichushkin screwed them over yet again, and they bowed out in the second round. I kinda thought this year was going to go similarly if they kept playing as they have been.To state the obvious, Colorado are/were in the top 5 most likely teams to win the cup this year. Maybe top 3. Don't you run it back in this situation? Just let Rantanen walk in free agency for a chance at a cup? I think I would. This is madness.
Knowing Hall's injury history there was no guarantee he would be healthy either when the TDL rolls around and they could have ended up with nothing. People are making too much of the return. It is fine.
Seems like it’s the people who understand the least about a trade here bitch the mostYou'd think a guy with this many posts crying about the trade in this thread would know the full details of the trade at the very least
And costs nowhere near the same for the duration.
They may want it back it to support their ability to issue an offer sheet. Think bigger.Chicago paid 5 million for their own third back
Clown show
This is a bad take ….. Chicago did really well….Didn't read all 24 pages but came here to clown on Chicago.
Retained 50% of Rantanen, meaning they were crucial in getting this deal done, and all they got was a third rounder?
If that doesn't explain the Blackhawks management in a nutshell, nothing does.
100% fair and right now KK is playing as a player worth his contract and 2nd year out of 3 that he's doing so.Carolina is happy with KK, and even if they decide to let him go, it cost them less than a million to buy him out. Which is less than Drury anyway.