Confirmed Signing with Link: [CAR] Brett Pesce Agree to new contract (6 years, $4.025M AAV)

RodTheBawd

Registered User
Oct 16, 2013
5,529
8,604
Let's hop off the "how do you not know who these guys are?" horse. It's not unreasonable for a non-flashy shutdown d-man in his second year playing for a small market (or any market, really) to be unknown to the vast majority of the hockey world.
 

Cane mutiny

Ahoy_Aho
Sep 5, 2006
1,951
1,876
That's your opinion.


I dont even think it's close to accurate.


He's not a #1 yet. Seth Jones is easily the best of that group and will only increase his gap going forward.


Klefbom is the 2nd best of that group, followed closely by Parayko and Slavin.

Pesce/Dumo are the bottom of that group, but I would agree Pesce is probably the favorable choice going forward. Although Dumolin certainly has more offensive upside simply due to the forwards he'll have the opportunity to play with.



But regardless, my point was all these guys are pretty close in terms of skill and all are within 1.5M of cap space. This 4-5.5M range is the new going rate for good, established young Dmen.

We'll likely see Werenski, Provorov, Chychrun, McAvoy, Hanifin, etc. sign similar contracts in the next couple of years also.

I may be wrong, but I think he was referring to the best DEAL, not necessarily comparing who the best PLAYER is. Your responses to these posts seem a touch bitter, not sure why.
 
Jul 18, 2010
26,686
57,416
Atlanta, GA
Let's hop off the "how do you not know who these guys are?" horse. It's not unreasonable for a non-flashy shutdown d-man in his second year playing for a small market (or any market, really) to be unknown to the vast majority of the hockey world.

No issue with guys not having heard of him.

Just an issue with the rationale "I haven't heard of him, so he must not be as good as everyone is saying," instead of "I haven't heard of him but everyone is saying he's good, must be a gap in my own knowledge."
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,219
15,544
Toronto, ON
No issue with guys not having heard of him.

Just an issue with the rationale "I haven't heard of him, so he must not be as good as everyone is saying," instead of "I haven't heard of him but everyone is saying he's good, must be a gap in my own knowledge."

This.

Takes like 5 minutes of research to not make bonehead comments.
 

KingTux

On espère pour Lafrenière
Aug 9, 2013
4,512
375
hu2l
Lets say its 2018

Slavin (5.3) - Pesce (4.025)
Hanifin (3 Probably a bridge deal) - Faulk (4.8)
Fleury (0.925) - TVR (Probably between 2.5-3.5)

That's around 20 millions

Insane work by Francis, and there will be Jake Bean coming in as well
 

Esq

in terrorem
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2009
8,018
4,052
Village in the City
This might turn out to be a great deal.

Or it might not.

My concern with these types of deals (including the Slavin deal) is that many defensemen regress once the league adjusts to them. Including guys that HF loved, and also signed long-term deals. Myers, Bogosian, Edler come to mind immediately. Not to mention neither Slavin nor Pesce has played a minute of NHL playoff hockey.

But, of course, HF is like "OMG STEAL." And someone will of course tell me I'm being silly because I just don't watch enough Canes hockey.
 

the halleJOKEL

strong as brickwall
Jul 21, 2006
14,602
25,978
twitter.com
This might turn out to be a great deal.

Or it might not.

My concern with these types of deals (including the Slavin deal) is that many defensemen regress once the league adjusts to them. Including guys that HF loved, and also signed long-term deals. Myers, Bogosian, Edler come to mind immediately. Not to mention neither Slavin nor Pesce has played a minute of NHL playoff hockey.

But, of course, HF is like "OMG STEAL." And someone will of course tell me I'm being silly because I just don't watch enough Canes hockey.

you're being silly because you do not watch enough canes hockey
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,219
15,544
Toronto, ON
thanks, I needed that ;)

I mean, he's not wrong though. Just because you're aware of it doesn't invalidate the overwhelming positivity of the signing. Sure, Slavin or Pesce could turn into pumkins I guess but nothing in their resume has indicated that. They played their way onto the team and leapfrogged higher touted players with better pedigrees. Like I guess the McDavid signing could be terrible too if the league figures him out as well.

These are pretty low risk - high reward in the grand scheme of things and exactly what a team like Carolina needs to do. If they gave out bridge deals and their young players progressed as planned, they likely wouldn't be able to afford them once they hit UFA.
 

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
This might turn out to be a great deal.

Or it might not.

My concern with these types of deals (including the Slavin deal) is that many defensemen regress once the league adjusts to them. Including guys that HF loved, and also signed long-term deals. Myers, Bogosian, Edler come to mind immediately. Not to mention neither Slavin nor Pesce has played a minute of NHL playoff hockey.

But, of course, HF is like "OMG STEAL." And someone will of course tell me I'm being silly because I just don't watch enough Canes hockey.

What exactly is there about Slavin and Pesce's games that you see as something that can be "adjusted" to? It's not like these are gimmicky offensive players with one good breakaway move or something. They're both solid positionally sound shutdown defensive dmen. Has the league ever adjusted to players like Vlasic or Hjarmalsson
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
This might turn out to be a great deal.

Or it might not.

My concern with these types of deals (including the Slavin deal) is that many defensemen regress once the league adjusts to them. Including guys that HF loved, and also signed long-term deals. Myers, Bogosian, Edler come to mind immediately. Not to mention neither Slavin nor Pesce has played a minute of NHL playoff hockey.

But, of course, HF is like "OMG STEAL." And someone will of course tell me I'm being silly because I just don't watch enough Canes hockey.

Well... How much of Pesce/Slavin have you watched?

Regression can happen in anyone. What is for sure is that Slavin and Pesce have been absolutely rock solid defensive top-4 to top-pairing fixtures for about 1.5 straight seasons... without interruption, every single shift, in the hardest division in hockey, as 21-22 year old Rookies/Sophomores. I don't think there is a Canes fan alive that would disagree, because we watch the games and it is what it is. IMO players that consistent are unlikely to regress.

There is really nothing for the league to "adjust to". Slavin/Pesce aren't doing anything novel. They both are just big, mobile, highly intelligent players with outstanding gap control and defensive zone awareness. The only adjusting that can be done is coaches desperately trying to flatten their lines to shield some scoring from that pairing.
 

Finlandia WOAT

No blocks, No slappers
May 23, 2010
24,412
24,682
There's not really a major hole in either players' defensive game for opposing forwards to exploit.

Anyway, Bogosian was never good, is soft as a chinchilla's coat and has injury problems; Myers was carried by Tallinder that year and....what's wrong with Edler? He was considered a great top pairing guy, the #1 guy on a dynamite 'Nucks team.
 

Esq

in terrorem
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2009
8,018
4,052
Village in the City
What exactly is there about Slavin and Pesce's games that you see as something that can be "adjusted" to? It's not like these are gimmicky offensive players with one good breakaway move or something. They're both solid positionally sound shutdown defensive dmen. Has the league ever adjusted to players like Vlasic or Hjarmalsson

MEV and Hjalms are top-5 (some might even argue top-3) shutdown defenseman in the league. I don't think they are the best comparison here.

My point is that we don't know enough about these players to assume these will be steals of contracts.

I'd at least like to see how they fare in the playoffs, personally.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
MEV and Hjalms are top-5 (some might even argue top-3) shutdown defenseman in the league. I don't think they are the best comparison here.

My point is that we don't know enough about these players to assume these will be steals of contracts.

I'd at least like to see how they fare in the playoffs, personally.

Slavin is a 22 year old Vlasic. He is literally the best comparable.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
25,166
43,434
colorado
Visit site
MEV and Hjalms are top-5 (some might even argue top-3) shutdown defenseman in the league. I don't think they are the best comparison here.

My point is that we don't know enough about these players to assume these will be steals of contracts.

I'd at least like to see how they fare in the playoffs, personally.

They've been a top four pairing since literally the days they showed up on recall early two seasons ago. They play against the best players the other team has. They play the hardest minutes available on a mediocre team desperate for players who can take the assignments and the moment they showed an ability to handle it the coach borderline overused them.

I know it's a different position with an 10-20 game difference but to me it's similar to saying you don't know what you have in Panarin because it's too small a sample. At their positions for the canes they've had as much an impact defensively as Panarin has offensively. From the moment they arrived it was obvious these two Canes were raising the play of the team and were better than just about everyone on their team at defense. Panarin had Kane, the Canes had Faulk but many of us thought they were better than Faulk defensively from the get go.

There's been plenty of sample size for these two. Vlasic is a reasonable comparable for Slavin. Pesce is different with his skating and maybe has a loose comparability to Hammer in approach but they don't look remotely similar.

I don't think either contract is a steal, but canes fans are happy they have them signed for reasonable prices when both could've asked for the moon based on what they've acccomplished so far. They could've forced the canes hands and made the future of the team look less bright by soaking up more of the available cash. I think they are getting paid right at the spot they should be paid, and with inflation if the players don't improve and just hold steady it will be good value. If they improve and as you say do well on the playoffs then they become fantastic deals.

Teams overpay a lot, Canes fans have good reason to be happy. They can afford this future so far.
 
Last edited:

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
MEV and Hjalms are top-5 (some might even argue top-3) shutdown defenseman in the league.

Slavin has been drawing comparisons to Vlasic for 2 years now. Pesce is probably more comparable to Dumoulin except more physical and a little better offensively.

Regardless, I wasn't make a "this guy is as good as this guy" comparison, I was making a stylistic comparison.

So if NHL teams haven't found a specific flaw that makes those other guys prone to be "adjusted to" then it's doubtful they will for Slavin and Pesce to be "adjusted to" as well.

And frankly, two seasons of very solid play from both guys is more than enough sample size to declare them what they are at the NHL level. It's not a mirage or a fluke or anything else you might want to say. Nobody would be making that claim if they were 1st round picks instead of 3rd and 4th round picks. Frankly, I think it's high time people start realize that the US college system is producing the best young defensemen in the game right now.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,301
101,921
Let's hop off the "how do you not know who these guys are?" horse. It's not unreasonable for a non-flashy shutdown d-man in his second year playing for a small market (or any market, really) to be unknown to the vast majority of the hockey world.

I think you are missing the point of those posts Rod. As AD said, no issue with someone not being familiar with Pesce. Issue is him saying he must not be that good because he hasn't heard of him. Some pretty silly reasoning.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,301
101,921
This might turn out to be a great deal.

Or it might not.

My concern with these types of deals (including the Slavin deal) is that many defensemen regress once the league adjusts to them. Including guys that HF loved, and also signed long-term deals. Myers, Bogosian, Edler come to mind immediately. Not to mention neither Slavin nor Pesce has played a minute of NHL playoff hockey.

But, of course, HF is like "OMG STEAL." And someone will of course tell me I'm being silly because I just don't watch enough Canes hockey.

I remember last off season a poster saying Slavin and Pesce would have sophomore slumps because "the league would adjust to them". The poster was convinced.
 

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
I remember that too. I think it was in the oh-so-memorable, oh-so-stupid "dead last" thread.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad