Yes, says me, the guy who has been saying that looking exclusively at discrepancies in small sample playoff point totals can be deceiving for years, while the people now blasting the playoff leading scorer previously claimed that points are all that matter and Marner was trash because his point totals didn't live up to their expectations for reasons that they'll conveniently ignore.
Marner consistently brings it in the playoffs, and his underlying metrics are excellent as well. There are people here who didn't want to hear it and claimed points were perfectly representative when the points underrepresented Marner, but now are all too happy to talk about how the points are currently overrepresenting Marner. We all want 16 wins, not 4, and Marner will be a big part of that, not a "cause for concern".