Speculation: Caps Roster General Discussion (Coaching/FAs/Cap/Lines/etc) | 2024-25 Summer Edition

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

895

Registered User
Jun 15, 2007
8,510
7,393


I really don’t like this quote.


It reads very strongly to me as “you’re a nice guy but…”

It’s bad if a guy comes in and does everything to earn a spot but doesn’t get it because of waiver/contract status. Another year in juniors is wasted. We have a potentially very god player here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: um

hb13xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
9,227
6,155
Pennsylvania
You give Cristall his 9 game tryout and then make the decision. He’s had a solid camp and a solid number of preseason games but the 9 game tryout is a more realistic “preseason” for him. He’s not playing against top competition, veterans are going half speed for the most part and the goaltending league wide during preseason has been poor this year. Give him the 9 games and tell him, “don’t make me send you back to juniors” and see if he continues to produce when it counts.
 

Ovechkins Wodka

Registered User
Dec 1, 2007
18,320
8,134
DC


I really don’t like this quote.


It reads very strongly to me as “you’re a nice guy but…”

It’s bad if a guy comes in and does everything to earn a spot but doesn’t get it because of waiver/contract status. Another year in juniors is wasted. We have a potentially very god player here.
The fact that the rules are, he’s either juniors or NHL and can’t really promote is kind of bullshit. He should be able to play in the AHL if his development says so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kazer

Misery74

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,479
2,422


I really don’t like this quote.


It reads very strongly to me as “you’re a nice guy but…”

It’s bad if a guy comes in and does everything to earn a spot but doesn’t get it because of waiver/contract status. Another year in juniors is wasted. We have a potentially very god player here.
I kind of disagree. He wants the kid to keep fighting.

Not over yet.
 

Misery74

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,479
2,422
Would we go 14F and 7D? Waive Bear? No idea if this is cap compliant. Rotate in Cristall / Vrana for Lapierre/Milano/McMichael. Do this for first 10 games until someone either gets hurts or the picture clears up. Can always send back Cristall or waive Vrana

Ovi-Strome-Mangiapane
McMichael-Dubois-Wilson
Protas-Lapierre-Milano
Duhaime-Dowd-Raddysh
Cristall / Vrana

Chychrun-Carlson
Fehervary-Roy
Sandin-TvR
Alexeyev
I feel like Jake is a good story, but we have a logjam, and he’s in the way more than anything.

Let the kids play.
 

Brian23

Registered User
Dec 3, 2011
5,799
2,683
I feel like Jake is a good story, but we have a logjam, and he’s in the way more than anything.

Let the kids play.
I don't see how Vrana is the one in the way with the log jam, the log jam is at center and they've locked in to two top centers in Strome and PLD for the foreseeable future. They have two center prospects that need to play at center (three if you think Cristall deserves a cup of coffee), but realistically only one spot.

They're actually incredibly shallow at the wing positions, something a Vrana poker chip could remedy pretty quickly if it hits.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
65,755
20,610
I don't see how Vrana is the one in the way with the log jam, the log jam is at center and they've locked in to two top centers in Strome and PLD for the foreseeable future. They have two center prospects that need to play at center (three if you think Cristall deserves a cup of coffee), but realistically only one spot.

They're actually incredibly shallow at the wing positions, something a Vrana poker chip could remedy pretty quickly if it hits.

Cristall isn’t playing C, and where do those overflow C’s go? Wing. Log jam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qc14

Brian23

Registered User
Dec 3, 2011
5,799
2,683
Cristall isn’t playing C, and where do those overflow C’s go? Wing. Log jam.
Even if you don't want to count him, playing one of the kids at wing just because you've got an actual logjam at center is just setting them up for failure. We've already established that CMM is a much worse winger then he's been at center, can't wait to hear how shit you think he is when they've forced him to wing because of the actual logjam at center.

The log jam is at center, a true winger shouldn't be the make or break for centers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calicaps and g00n

Ovechkins Wodka

Registered User
Dec 1, 2007
18,320
8,134
DC
If your paying attention to coaches lines
It looks like the Lappy is gonna be center
Connor McMichael is probably going to be on wing
And Vrana is fighting to stay on the roster hopefully we keep him. I would be very disappointed if he went through all this on a PTO and got cut.

I thought for sure Lappy was a lock for opening night. But maybe they don’t promote him
 

g00n

Retired Global Mod
Nov 22, 2007
31,068
15,519
It seems like they've got PTSD from losing center depth in recent years, so they stockpile them and move the surplus to wing.

Not sure if this is good or bad. I'm leaning toward bad, as it may not be worth it to hoard those nuts just to have a mid 2-3C available if needed, which means you slot in a lesser winger from Hershey or the press box, after playing a center out of position in the first place.

Seems like a lot of half-assing when you could just fill your slots with the best possible players at each position, which means no moving centers to wings just to keep them around. Go get (or promote) some true wingers instead. Then deal with injuries as they happen.
 

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,808
9,791
I like that they gave McMichael a look at center. He did more offensively, albeit nothing amazing, than Lapierre has done thus far. I think we likely need to see an offensive pulse from Lapierre his next time in for him to be in the opening night lineup. He's not a player that should be groomed to be the next Marcus Johansson or something. Or Lars Eller. Utility is nice. Being able to play in all situations is valuable but they need dynamic offense. If he's not bringing that and generally pushing the pace it seems like the best argument for keeping Cristall around. Generally you don't want younger players sitting but in his case there could be value in him traveling, practicing with the team and learning the ropes generally in terms of video and watching the game from up high. They can't and shouldn't keep him merely because he's too good to be in the WHL but I'd be open to not rushing to judgement on a permanent decision due to contract status or the waiver status of others. If he's one of their best 13 or 14 forwards then give him the opportunity to claw his way up.

I'd very likely only carry seven defensemen as well to offset potentially carrying two extra forwards. I guess the extra would be Alexeyev but McIlrath seems at least serviceable. Not great but super familiar with the systems and mostly keeps it simple. Bear's time ought to be up I think. He's perhaps serviceable but the lack of plus strength or size offers little in the way of a calling card.

Overall at this point I'd keep both Vrana and Cristall around and just let it play out. Miro would be the odd man out since he's the easiest to assign to Hershey and be the first call-up. They can't decry a lack of offensive punch on the one hand and not follow that to its logical conclusion re: risk tolerance and what are a couple of very useful competitive options. Either way the top of the lineup will be challenged against more dynamic lineups. But it's also tough to have a firm sense of what the optimal combinations are. The fourth line is set. They didn't take long at all. Ovechkin-Strome-Mangiapane certainly looks just fine. But the middle six could remain very fluid. PLD-Wilson should be a pair that sticks together. Aside from that I'd expect a lot of mixing and matching trying to find answers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: g00n

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,808
9,791
Piggybacking off of the middle six talk, I'd be very intrigued by what a Protas-PLD-Wilson checking line is capable of. The Dowd line will absorb some of that role...or at least a lot of the DZ assignments. But that sort of line is probably how I'd play it starting off to make a point about defense and physicality rather than spreading it out more. Then cobbling together the best depth scoring line possible from the leftovers, though I doubt they'd play Vrana & Cristall together on the same line barring injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: g00n

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
65,755
20,610
Even if you don't want to count him, playing one of the kids at wing just because you've got an actual logjam at center is just setting them up for failure. We've already established that CMM is a much worse winger then he's been at center, can't wait to hear how shit you think he is when they've forced him to wing because of the actual logjam at center.

The log jam is at center, a true winger shouldn't be the make or break for centers.
Not every C playing wing struggles….IMO it’s an easier assignment for your typical C. CMM so far at least, that sadly hasn’t been the case.

So for me, if the superior talent happens to be a C, I’m keeping him on the roster over an inferior talent at wing. Natural position be damned. I want the better hockey player.
 

BiPolar Caps

Registered User
Feb 9, 2010
9,659
2,883
NOVA
After watching a good part of last nights game, still leaning towards the following:

Ovechkin - Strome - Mangiapane
Vrana/Cristall - PLD - Wilson
Cristall/Vrana - McMichael - Protas
Duhaime - Dowd - Raddysh
Milano/Rybinski (based on Carberry's comments)

Give Cristall his 9 games to see how he performs against "real" competition in regular season games.

Lapierre/Miroshnichenko start the season in Hershey.

Chychrun - Carlson
Fehervary - Roy
Sandin - TVR
AA

Lindgren/Thompson

The folks that will have to pass through waivers to get to Hershey will be:
Sgarbossa
Sutter
Frank
McIrath
HAK
Priskie
I may be missing some but I believe most others i.e. Iorio are waiver exempt.

Sandin's the one that's in the dog house for me. Not that I understand the work visa process, but that process should have been initiated much sooner and he should have been over here in August working out with the others (evidently Vrana had no such problems with his work visa). He did not have a stellar season last year and he and Carberry had conversations about just that and what he needs to do to improve. Well to me he started this year off on the wrong foot.
 

tycoonheart

Registered User
Apr 7, 2010
10,773
3,083
I like Vrana and have liked what I've seen from him so far. But I'd rather keep Cristall and Miro. Like people have been saying, Cristall looks like a player maker and we desperately need that on the team. And Miro is one of the few forwards we have who actually shoots the pick. I think both of them fill a void.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: um

um

Registered User
Sep 4, 2008
16,006
5,919
toronto


I really don’t like this quote.


It reads very strongly to me as “you’re a nice guy but…”

It’s bad if a guy comes in and does everything to earn a spot but doesn’t get it because of waiver/contract status. Another year in juniors is wasted. We have a potentially very god player here.
I'd be very annoyed because this is what the 9 game trial is for. No good reason not to use it.
 
Last edited:

Lou Sassole

Registered User
Oct 15, 2020
221
316
They're gonna give him every chance to succeed because they took the chance on him, but he won't play if doesn't seize that opportunity
Plus, I think we need to be as close to the 88 mil cap to take advantage of all the LTIR amount. Bear costs more than those guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qc14

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad