twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,192
- 15,774
Yep. And it was the Erskine Eminger pairing that fooled Philly. Erskine carried that pair and no surprise Erskine would have a solid playoff series vs the Flies - that scenario was the wheelhouse for Erskine if there ever was one. Yeah I am still pissed they called the Poti penalty when someone stepped on his blade because Erskine had tripped up someone on the shift before that uncalled. 15 years I can remember it like yesterday and yes I am still bitter. Random Fact: Erskine had 4 shots in that game 7 meanwhile the more "offensive" trade bait Eminger had only 1 shot the entire series.Calling our best draft trade a miss is a bad take. Trading Steve Eminger to the flyers after 1 good playoff game for Carlson was maybe GMGM best trade.
Calling our best draft trade a miss is a bad take. Trading Steve Eminger to the flyers after 1 good playoff game for Carlson was maybe GMGM best trade.
He was traded for the 27th overall pick. Luckily the scouts and/or GMGM found the 6th best player in the draft with that pick.Calling our best draft trade a miss is a bad take. Trading Steve Eminger to the flyers after 1 good playoff game for Carlson was maybe GMGM best trade.
Again I'm not saying it's a miss in the traditional sense of the word. Carlson was an excellent pick no matter how you slice it. If every pick they made was as efficient as the Carlson pick they'd be unstoppable.
But in the purely mathematical sense they may have left a tiny bit of value on the table if you value Josi higher than Carlson as a player, which I think most people do. I was simply trying to define what a miss meant in this context. In no way am I suggesting they made a bad pick.
Uhhhh.... what in the world is going on in here? Seems like a good example of how hyperfocus on optimizing numbers and bad methodology can make people say some really goofy things and draw irrelevant or incomplete conclusions.
Yes, but... bending magic and technology, combining fantasy and microchips, just to see things behind bolted doors, talent and imagination is... textbook weird science. (OooOooh!)Molding reality and ditching common sense or observation just to fit the numbers is textbook bad science.
I'm going to be honest, I haven't read through most of these recent posts
28 or so day till rookie camp starts.Please just let the season start already.
Losing 10 pounds he's getting ready to level up his finesse game everyone!Don’t want. No thanks. Dude will injure himself before you know it.
I don't really understand this at all...Don’t want. No thanks. Dude will injure himself before you know it.
I love this interview... for the start of next season. He's clearly motivated to play but for our team it's good thing because he can start to rebuild his trade value.I don't really understand this at all...
You don't want a more motivated Mantha? You think the weight change is going to get him more injured because something? Recognizing his mentality is somehow bad?
This is just naysaying to do it, to my eyes.
He has a long history of being injured (even before the Caps with the Wings). It is inevitable. It has nothing to do with the weight loss. I could care less about that.I don't really understand this at all...
You don't want a more motivated Mantha? You think the weight change is going to get him more injured because something? Recognizing his mentality is somehow bad?
This is just naysaying to do it, to my eyes.
As it often is, but unless GMBM is a fool, he realizes this and will either reap the rewards on ice, or in trade return.Carbery putting in the work talking to Blashill. Love it.
Mantha basically admitting he's shaping up mostly because he's in a contract year. Buyer beware. Simply about that paycheck.
I thought the same thing….Losing 10 pounds he's getting ready to level up his finesse game everyone!