Capitals to purchase CapFriendly website (upd: deal finalized, site has been shut down)

vorky

@vorkywh24
Jan 23, 2010
11,435
1,285
They don't. It's up to the teams to keep track of this stuff. If it wasn't for the NHLPA, none of the contract details would be out there for the public either.

And obviously all teams have staff to keep track of this stuff. The issue here is, that apparently a lot of the teams were just using CapFriendly to do this stuff, instead of engineering their own software. So those teams are SOL pretty soon and need to figure out something.
Weird. Why can not the NHL as a league offer (for free) their clubs such an important thing via centralised system/app? If the KHL can do this, I do not believe the NHL does not have resources for it.

But .... the NHL is not able to put the lenghts and type of players contract on league´s website to be available to fans.

zaitsev.png


source
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,164
17,999
Weird. Why can not the NHL as a league offer (for free) their clubs such an important thing via centralised system/app? If the KHL can do this, I do not believe the NHL does not have resources for it.

But .... the NHL is not able to put the lenghts and type of players contract on league´s website to be available to fans.

View attachment 893040

source
My guess is that the NHL doesn't want this kind of info to be mainstream. If I'd put on my tinfoil hat for a sec, I'd bet they convinced a team to buy them just for appearances sake, rather than the league itself buying it and disbanding it
 

Kahvi

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 4, 2007
5,001
3,672
Alberga
It's funny that teams actually use this website and don't already keep tabs on this stuff internally, now they're scrambling to find an alternative.

Funny stuff from a mickey mouse league.

I'd guess they are keeping track of their own cap situation, but Capfriendly helps when you are negotiating with other teams. Like how tight they are with cap and how valuable retention is because of that etc.
 

vorky

@vorkywh24
Jan 23, 2010
11,435
1,285
My guess is that the NHL doesn't want this kind of info to be mainstream. If I'd put on my tinfoil hat for a sec, I'd bet they convinced a team to buy them just for appearances sake, rather than the league itself buying it and disbanding it
Fine, if the NHL does not want this kind of info to be available to public. Just make this app/system closed, just for teams like KHL did.
 

Marc the Habs Fan

Moderator
Nov 30, 2002
98,778
11,171
Longueuil
They don't. It's up to the teams to keep track of this stuff. If it wasn't for the NHLPA, none of the contract details would be out there for the public either.

And obviously all teams have staff to keep track of this stuff. The issue here is, that apparently a lot of the teams were just using CapFriendly to do this stuff, instead of engineering their own software. So those teams are SOL pretty soon and need to figure out something.
Huh, it's pretty clear the NHL has their own program that tracks every team's cap situation. Every trade and transaction like a call-up or waiver claim has to be approved by central registry and the team has to be cap compliant before the move can officially happen.

Also, Friedman on the 32 thoughts podcast or Marek's show (maybe both) backtracked after his original comments on how many teams were screwed without CapFriendly (which is still up as of this morning). He clarified by saying that many teams had something internally to keep track of teams cap situations and they were mad that Friedman's original comments made it seem like they were completely dependent on CF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeune Poulet

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
15,639
21,863
Huh, it's pretty clear the NHL has their own program that tracks every team's cap situation. Every trade and transaction like a call-up or waiver claim has to be approved by central registry and the team has to be cap compliant before the move can officially happen.
Of course the NHL head office has something, but they don't make it available for the teams (or the public), that was the point. And even the central registry doesn't have all the details, like M-NTC -lists (see case Dadonov).

Also, Friedman on the 32 thoughts podcast or Marek's show (maybe both) backtracked after his original comments on how many teams were screwed without CapFriendly (which is still up as of this morning). He clarified by saying that many teams had something internally to keep track of teams cap situations and they were mad that Friedman's original comments made it seem like they were completely dependent on CF.
Like I said, most teams probably have something, but not all of them have a system as elaborate as CF. Cap Friendly afaik also has some tools that are not available to the public?

BTW, Friedman never said that these are the only teams that have something, just those that he knew definitely did. I mean Capitals bought this site for a reason, what did they have before?
 

Vilica

Registered User
Jun 1, 2014
455
527
From my readings of articles and such, the NHL central cap registry exists for all teams, but apparently it's quite clunky and requires a login every time, as well as being available intranet/VPN only. The same is probably true for most teams' internal cap databases. In terms of the entire league, their own team is perfectly represented in the database, but tracking the league manually probably would require at least a part-time data entry/analyst. I believe that was one of CapFriendly's sources of revenue, teams paid for an API that inputted those transactions into their databases automatically, for them to organize.

So because both of those sources were internally-accessible only, a lot of teams just used CapFriendly because a tab on a web browser is much easier to handle. To give a concrete example, you're a GM who is travelling in-season with your team, and you want to look at a few players you're interested in acquiring. To access your internal resources, you have to login to your VPN, then open up your internal cap database, and probably login to that as well, then finally go to the teams/players you're looking at. In contrast, you open your browser to CapFriendly, click on the team/player of interest, and have 95-99% of the information you need right there. Convenience always wins.

So basically the Caps were looking at upgrading their internal cap database, and were probably quoted somewhere between 200-500k, plus associated ongoing personnel costs for maintenance and such. The cost to acquire CapFriendly was probably 2x-3x that, with roughly the same ongoing personnel costs, and they get a database/GUI they know works with no development time.
 

GQS

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
3,640
2,400
Has anyone tried contacting the CapFriendly people and seeing if the site will stay up or not? I'm happy that its still here for the moment, but I'm dreading that it could disappear at anytime. :( :( :(
 

BondraEra

Registered User
Jun 6, 2010
143
68
From my readings of articles and such, the NHL central cap registry exists for all teams, but apparently it's quite clunky and requires a login every time, as well as being available intranet/VPN only. The same is probably true for most teams' internal cap databases. In terms of the entire league, their own team is perfectly represented in the database, but tracking the league manually probably would require at least a part-time data entry/analyst. I believe that was one of CapFriendly's sources of revenue, teams paid for an API that inputted those transactions into their databases automatically, for them to organize.

So because both of those sources were internally-accessible only, a lot of teams just used CapFriendly because a tab on a web browser is much easier to handle. To give a concrete example, you're a GM who is travelling in-season with your team, and you want to look at a few players you're interested in acquiring. To access your internal resources, you have to login to your VPN, then open up your internal cap database, and probably login to that as well, then finally go to the teams/players you're looking at. In contrast, you open your browser to CapFriendly, click on the team/player of interest, and have 95-99% of the information you need right there. Convenience always wins.

So basically the Caps were looking at upgrading their internal cap database, and were probably quoted somewhere between 200-500k, plus associated ongoing personnel costs for maintenance and such. The cost to acquire CapFriendly was probably 2x-3x that, with roughly the same ongoing personnel costs, and they get a database/GUI they know works with no development time.
Thank you for actually reading about and breaking this down with reasonable analysis for those who didn’t (me included) instead of just saying “Caps bad”.
 

Nogatco Rd

Translator spent all my HF cash
Apr 3, 2021
1,456
3,058
My guess is that the NHL doesn't want this kind of info to be mainstream. If I'd put on my tinfoil hat for a sec, I'd bet they convinced a team to buy them just for appearances sake, rather than the league itself buying it and disbanding it
So if a new site pops up to replace cap friendly, do you think the NHL will convince a team to buy that out as well?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DamonDRW

The Red Line

Registered User
Oct 11, 2010
8,492
4,988
I'm sure there will be something new to replace it before long, but I really like the armchair GM feature for playing around with. CapGeek was great too back in the day, and Cap Friendly did a good job of replacing and improving on those features. Hopefully whatever comes next is also well built.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordy Elbows

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
24,064
11,974
I'm sure there will be something new to replace it before long, but I really like the armchair GM feature for playing around with. CapGeek was great too back in the day, and Cap Friendly did a good job of replacing and improving on those features. Hopefully whatever comes next is also well built.
Other sites have been around for years as well, not as good imo, but exist.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad