AppleHoneySauce
Registered User
- Apr 26, 2021
- 2,429
- 1,948
Because part of being a good fourth liner is being cheap.Question, if bad fourth liners are making league minimum, then why should good fourth liners make the same?
Because part of being a good fourth liner is being cheap.Question, if bad fourth liners are making league minimum, then why should good fourth liners make the same?
The hockey world is littered with plenty of players with the same skill level. They all would be happy to get the NHL minimum salary to play on the 4th line. If not, you move along to the next willing player....as I said, there are plenty of players out there with the same skill level.Because part of being a good fourth liner is being cheap.
He would be if we had solid defensive centers so he could fit in better as a defensive winger on that lineso someone tweeted his advanced stats in terms of shot suppression happens to be the highest in the NHL.
all that said, that was when he was with Dallas Stars. At that point his one weakness that needs improvement is face offs. So at the time he was a very good pick up by Benning. I think its still a solid pick up by the Canucks.
People love to shit on this guy but hes EASILY been one of our top 15 forwards this season
People love to shit on this guy but hes EASILY been one of our top 15 forwards this season
People love to shit on this guy but hes EASILY been one of our top 15 forwards this season
JBenning went to his grave as an NHL GM somehow believing that these players could somehow replicate their success in Vancouver that they had playing for high-end teams like Washington and Dallas.Jay Beagle 21 GP 1 Pts, $3M
Antoine Roussel 34 GP 5 Pts, $3M
Jason Dickinson 40 GP 5 Pts, $2.7M
Jim Benning is amazing. I don't even know how well you could do this if you tried.
Sutter has better games than Dickinson. Sutter isn't a great playmaker and doesn't wow anyone with his skillset, but he has his moments of being a decent player. If Jimbo didn't pay the world for him, he'd be fine. There's been one, maybe two times that Dickinson has done anything of note. Unfortunately, for me, he's another 4th line player that Jimbo overpaid for.I honestly have never seen this guy have a single strong game. Seems like another Brandon Sutter.
I hate Sutter but he was twice the player Dick is. He could score some goals and he was good on PK. Dicky is almost useless.I honestly have never seen this guy have a single strong game. Seems like another Brandon Sutter.
Making him a dman sounds good on paper... till he gets a hold of the puck.Try to convert him to defense. He has the offensive ability of a bottom 6 AHL’er
This guy handles the puck at a 5th grade level
Sutter has better games than Dickinson. Sutter isn't a great playmaker and doesn't wow anyone with his skillset, but he has his moments of being a decent player. If Jimbo didn't pay the world for him, he'd be fine. There's been one, maybe two times that Dickinson has done anything of note. Unfortunately, for me, he's another 4th line player that Jimbo overpaid for.
I hate Sutter but he was twice the player Dick is. He could score some goals and he was good on PK. Dicky is almost useless.
I had hope, I have lost all hope
Honestly, Rather keep Beagle over Dick atm
Rather have Beagle who's contract expires at the end of the season.I'd rather have Dick
Rather have Beagle who's contract expires at the end of the season.
Because part of being a good fourth liner is being cheap.
The hockey world is littered with plenty of players with the same skill level. They all would be happy to get the NHL minimum salary to play on the 4th line. If not, you move along to the next willing player....as I said, there are plenty of players out there with the same skill level.
He suppresses shots against? What else?so someone tweeted his advanced stats in terms of shot suppression happens to be the highest in the NHL.
all that said, that was when he was with Dallas Stars. At that point his one weakness that needs improvement is face offs. So at the time he was a very good pick up by Benning. I think its still a solid pick up by the Canucks.
Sutter has better games than Dickinson. Sutter isn't a great playmaker and doesn't wow anyone with his skillset, but he has his moments of being a decent player. If Jimbo didn't pay the world for him, he'd be fine. There's been one, maybe two times that Dickinson has done anything of note. Unfortunately, for me, he's another 4th line player that Jimbo overpaid for.
Sutter has had far, far better seasons as a Canuck (center). Nevermind games. His body unfortunately is just brokenSutter has better games than Dickinson. Sutter isn't a great playmaker and doesn't wow anyone with his skillset, but he has his moments of being a decent player. If Jimbo didn't pay the world for him, he'd be fine. There's been one, maybe two times that Dickinson has done anything of note. Unfortunately, for me, he's another 4th line player that Jimbo overpaid for.