AwesomeInTheory
A Christmas miracle
- Aug 21, 2015
- 4,669
- 5,163
Meh. Not what I was hoping for, but about what I expected, although honestly the difference of about $500k isn't a backbreaker.
I factored that in. Went with a 23 man roster and took two of the $750K guys off.There's also an extra 2.2m as 3 players shown on Capfriendly will be on Abby's roster and off the cap hit.
As I posted on the Main Board Thread, I like the Player and what he brings to our Team. I think this is a fair AAV & an easy term to handle.
It’s so unfortunate that each transaction this Team makes becomes a point of discussion regarding Management, rather than the player, but I understand why.
I, for one like this Deal, even if I’m not a fan of our GM. Call it my Canucks Coping Mechanism. I love this Team much like everyone else here does. I had to find a way to compartmentalize my fandom from the Management, if that makes sense to anyone?
Now, let’s find a way to sign Petey and Quinn:
View attachment 461155
Don't mind the deal considering the money Jimbo's splashed out for worse players. Maybe a touch on the high side, but not bad. Is there no trade protection, or have the complete terms not been reported yet?
Competent managers work out budgeting in advance. Not that you'd know that, obviously.
There's also an extra 2.2m as 3 players shown on Capfriendly will be on Abby's roster and off the cap hit.
I think Capfriendly is not updated yet. It's doesn't show Brisebois's contract, nor Dickinson's. With my calculation there will be 15.5 to 16 m left to sign Petey & Hughes.I factored that in. Went with a 23 man roster and took two of the $750K guys off.
I totally forgot about him but again there will be one more contract moved to Abby.Podkolzin isn't on the roster though so only ~1.3m.
Complete terms have not been reported, to my knowledge.
pretty stupid take. the other 2 big ones are obviously being worked on... he can do multiple deals at a time. he isnt going to not sign dickinson because the other 2 are having more difficulties getting signed...
im not even a benning fan but man you guys spin everything into something against him
It would be more like saying you liked a particular statement Trump made that contained one true statement and nothing else, without actually making any explicit reference to Trump let alone congratulating him.*deep sigh*
Of course not.
This is the equivalent of congratulating Trump for releasing a statement that contained one sentence that wasn't a bald-faced lie.
It would be more like saying you liked a particular statement Trump made that contained one true statement and nothing else, without actually making any explicit reference to Trump let alone congratulating him.