Confirmed with Link: Canucks Re-Sign W Nils Hoglander to 3y/3m AAV Contract

kanucks25

Chris Tanev #1 Fan
Nov 29, 2013
7,214
4,236
Surrey, BC
He's essentially the same player he was last season.

Being in great shape doesn't magically make the warts and inconsistencies in his game disappear.

It's clear Tocchet does not trust him to play high leverage minutes or PK minutes. So you have a guy playing bottom-6 minutes (and some PP, which is almost negligible given how little time the 2nd unit gets) that the coach doesn't trust defensively.

So usage wise you pretty much have another Sprong but at 3M instead of 900k. Management and coaches must really believe he has another gear, or at least will eventually play a more mature and well-rounded game.
 

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,508
1,400
He's essentially the same player he was last season.

Being in great shape doesn't magically make the warts and inconsistencies in his game disappear.

It's clear Tocchet does not trust him to play high leverage minutes or PK minutes. So you have a guy playing bottom-6 minutes (and some PP, which is almost negligible given how little time the 2nd unit gets) that the coach doesn't trust defensively.

So usage wise you pretty much have another Sprong but at 3M instead of 900k. Management and coaches must really believe he has another gear, or at least will eventually play a more mature and well-rounded game.
He brings more to the table than Sprong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bertuzzzi44

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,661
16,143
Still think he'll be moved.
Really thought that when Hoglander had his breakthrough 24 goal season and then signed a three year contract, that he'd be a Canuck for years.

But now I'm just not sure......hasn't been the best start to the season for Hoglnder, and his $3m contract doesn't cut in until next season. So any team acquiring him, is getting him for the rest of this season at just over $1m a season.

With Canucks having more holes in their blueline that Swiss cheese, Hoglander may have to sacrificed to shore it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regal

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,472
16,365
Vancouver
Really thought that when Hoglander had his breakthrough 24 goal season and then signed a three year contract, that he'd be a Canuck for years.

But now I'm just not sure......hasn't been the best start to the season for Hoglnder, and his $3m contract doesn't cut in until next season. So any team acquiring him, is getting him for the rest of this season at just over $1m a season.

With Canucks having more holes in their blueline that Swiss cheese, Hoglander may have to sacrificed to shore it up.

I knew he wouldn’t match his shooting percentage from last year, but I thought he’d get more opportunity in the top 9 and with it more shots to maybe have a 20-20 season even at a 13-14% shooting percentage. But more than that I think he just hasn’t been quite the consistent buzz saw we saw last year
 

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,508
1,400
It's 14 games. Whether he fits or not is a different conversation. He's 24, by all accounts, a bundle of energy and a popular teammate that has a decent play level as a kid and works his ass off. He scored 24 goals last year at ES. He has averaged 17 per 82 at 12 min TOI, and no PP time. His takeaways to giveaways is solid. Yet you have people who want to run him out of town. Same outfit hates Pettersson because he's a bit chilly.

Bring back Loui Eriksson.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,519
6,403
They all do cardio
1731574623357.jpeg
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad