Not sure why Philly would want to move Tippett?
Tippett is a ginger.
Depending on who it is, Willander/Lekkerimaki and their 1st would be the biggest assets. But it sounds like they may be looking to try to get a somewhat distressed asset for less.What are the Canucks putting on the table to get that impact mid 20's player?
What are the Canucks putting on the table to get that impact mid 20's player?
Van used the Rangers’ first to get a top four D man. They’d need to use their own 2025 first as an asset, and that doesn’t make sense unless the guy coming back is top six and mid twenties. Talk on the “Left” coast is about getting a guy who is likely cheap to acquire due to contract and other factors limiting value. Josh Norris’s name comes up out here.What are the Canucks putting on the table to get that impact mid 20's player?
What are the Canucks putting on the table to get that impact mid 20's player?
Likely nothing that would warrant serious consideration. The most enticing pieces, they won't offer.
The problem with those mid 20's impact forwards is that everyone wants them, from contenders to rebuilding teams. They're not often being sold unless there's a compelling non-hockey related reason (contract, attitude, etc.).
Van used the Rangers’ first to get a top four D man. They’d need to use their own 2025 first as an asset, and that doesn’t make sense unless the guy coming back is top six and mid twenties. Talk on the “Left” coast is about getting a guy who is likely cheap to acquire due to contract and other factors limiting value. Josh Norris’s name comes up out here.
Depending on who it is, Willander/Lekkerimaki and their 1st would be the biggest assets. But it sounds like they may be looking to try to get a somewhat distressed asset for less.
Likely nothing that would warrant serious consideration. The most enticing pieces, they won't offer.
The problem with those mid 20's impact forwards is that everyone wants them, from contenders to rebuilding teams. They're not often being sold unless there's a compelling non-hockey related reason (contract, attitude, etc.).
I’ve thought a lot about this and I think Tage Thompson is a good fit.
He represents a lot of what miller represented, is a nice threat that would help replace some shooting that would be lost if Boesser leaves.
Also, Buffalo has its defense in whatever condition it is in, but you wouldn’t think they’d be needing Vancouver’s prized prospect in Willander.
Still, it would be expensive-ish and I don’t think I’m able to guess at the deal. Seems like Buffalo should be able to get one of the bigger returns if they move a guy like Tage Thompson. Sure would be convenient if by chance Buffalo wanted to sign Boesser and he was okay with that, but being so close to ufa, really have to guess any player would use that to their benefit.
There is nothing to discuss when it comes to Thompson. You guys aren't trading the pieces necessary for him and we don't want your spare parts, prospects and/or picks. Makes zero sense for Buffalo.I’ve thought a lot about this and I think Tage Thompson is a good fit.
He represents a lot of what miller represented, is a nice threat that would help replace some shooting that would be lost if Boesser leaves.
Also, Buffalo has its defense in whatever condition it is in, but you wouldn’t think they’d be needing Vancouver’s prized prospect in Willander.
Still, it would be expensive-ish and I don’t think I’m able to guess at the deal. Seems like Buffalo should be able to get one of the bigger returns if they move a guy like Tage Thompson. Sure would be convenient if by chance Buffalo wanted to sign Boesser and he was okay with that, but being so close to ufa, really have to guess any player would use that to their benefit.
I think that’s why a guy like Norris comes up. I’ve heard Zegras mentioned too. These are guys who have top six skills but their value is lower because of other factors. Much like Chytl. Sure top six skills, but injury concerns limit value. Norris has a contract and injury concerns. Zegras has all those “rumours” about other stuff. Guys I don’t think the Habs would be interested in, imo. They’d be looking for sure players, especially if spending like suggested.If you are looking for an impact guy in his mid 20's, that will require a hockey trade. 1/1 type trade. Trust me, the Habs are looking to add as well and we have two 1st rounders as well. If you find a potential 2C in their 20's, you will have to fight us over him.
And this typically happens once or twice a year. It's not so much a matter of targeting... let's randomly pick Nick Suzuki, and stacking the trade value until Montreal agrees, as it is being patient and waiting for such a player to come available for a variety of reasons like you suggest. At which point it's more a matter of being a destination the player wants to go and having the cap space to fit him, and pretty much every team has the assets to complete such a trade.Likely nothing that would warrant serious consideration. The most enticing pieces, they won't offer.
The problem with those mid 20's impact forwards is that everyone wants them, from contenders to rebuilding teams. They're not often being sold unless there's a compelling non-hockey related reason (contract, attitude, etc.).
*a rental top four dman. An impact forward in his mid 20's is unlikely to be a rental.Van used the Rangers’ first to get a top four D man. They’d need to use their own 2025 first as an asset, and that doesn’t make sense unless the guy coming back is top six and mid twenties. Talk on the “Left” coast is about getting a guy who is likely cheap to acquire due to contract and other factors limiting value. Josh Norris’s name comes up out here.
A top prospect and a mid 1st gets you a 30+ year old?You might not like it but that gets you someone in the 30-35/36 years. Someone staring their prime and trending well? Good luck with that. Not impossible but very very difficult and you will have to fight other teams over it. If that guy is a 2C, the Habs will be all over this as well.
Yeah and I’m tryin to smash Sydney Sweeney, see who gets lucky first
Miller is toxic and wanted out, Debrincat also wanted out. The first time DeBrincat got dealt, he returned a 7th overall pick++. If Van can find a similar situation they won't have to pay as much, but typically mid 20's impact forwards aren't dealt for so little as the two examples you're giving.Why are people mentioning Willander/Lekkerimaki??? If you don't know other teams prospects outside their top 2 maybe don't propose hypothetical trades.
These type of players don't get traded.
Debrincat got Sebrango as an add on..
JT Miller got Mancini lol.
HFBoards doesn't even recognize normal patterns or how trade packages work in this league.
Fans proposing preposterous offers means nothing in real life. About as real as playing NHL on PlayStation.