Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, & Fantasy GM | Chaos Week | Page 52 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, & Fantasy GM | Chaos Week

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
It's always funny for me when I see some of the 'independent thinkers' on this board freaking out about something that seems to either be apropos of nothing, or else something already settled.

Like the Hronek thing.

Then someone mentions that our useless media has been clickbaiting with that today and I nod and remember that for all of the rightful disdain for our media, there are some on these boards who follow it like lemmings and then convince themselves it's their own idea.
-

There's clearly a zeitgeist shift in the NHL and hfboards isn't catching up.

Draft picks were so incredibly useful in the past because the cap was flat and ELCs were worth far more than their weight in gold.

Now the cap has skyrocketed and there's a talent shortage in the NHL.

It's not surprising to us oldtimers to see that real talent is valued far higher than mid/late first lottery tickets. It has been like that in the before times as well.

Like the Nemec deal. I'm not sure of fit with Parekh there, but the odds are really high that none of those picks ever become anything comparable to Nemec and now that salary cap isn't the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd consideration these trades become more commonplace.

So which is it? Is every GM dumber than your average hfboards poster?

Or is it possible that the league shifts in ways some of us are slower to catch up on.

Even the Byram thing. I think #4 was too high a price, but learning that like 3 different teams with lottery picks were competing for him suggests that high pedigree talent is at a premium and maybe there's more going on than 'hurr durr I'm smarter than every GM'.
-

It's also interesting to see impulsive posters shown again that patience is a virtue.

There have been many posters absolutely screeching for us to dump Pettersson for nothing and retain if we have to. "Just get rid of him!"

Now, I'm one of the few who still wants to keep him. But even if you want to trade him, I'm gathering people can start to read the tea leaves and see that in a world where Tuch gets 10.5 and Byram is rumored at 12, Pettersson becomes a decent contract even if he only rebounds a little bit with home run potential.
Patience would lead his value to skyrocket versus trading him when some wanted to.

It's very much like the freaking out that was going on when Hronek was signed and I said, 'look at the cap going up, this will be an incredible bargain soon' but that did nothing to stop the freaking out.

Hfboards is far better than reddit for a hockey nerd but some of this 'time is a flat circle' stuff on freaking out for its own sake is so exhausting.
Agreed. I know we all make fun of NHL GMs but at the end of the day any GM has a 99% chance of being a better hockey mind than anyone on this forum.

That said if we weren't allowed to criticize then HF wouldn't exist. So it is fun to manage and imagine being a GM yourself. We're hockey nerds afterall.

As always though, patience is a virtue and that's one thing this rebuild will need. Patience.
 
Willander or Benson?
giphy.gif
 
Willander or Benson?
Benson has a career high of 13 goals. I know he is more of a passer but he needs to pop 25+ if he wants to be a top line forward. I'd still take Willander unless Benson really lights it up. Forwards generally hit their prime sooner than D so I don't think we have seen the best of Willander yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVH
I can’t envision RJ and the Twins being very aggressive phone caller, deal makers, too polite, and are probably scared easy during negotiations.
 
I can’t envision RJ and the Twins being very aggressive phone caller, deal makers, too polite, and are probably scared easy during negotiations.
Lol based on what? 2 minute interviews you’ve seen? This is silly speculation.

I imagine they might be reserved but firm. Take it or leave it type negotiations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVH
I can’t envision RJ and the Twins being very aggressive phone caller, deal makers, too polite, and are probably scared easy during negotiations.
Damn you are a quick study to be able to figure all of that out from 2-D photographs!

Please tell us more of what you’ve learned about them…When do you think we can expect some trades?

Do you think we should fire them now, or maybe wait a couple of weeks?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flik

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad