Confirmed with Link: Cangy Stepping Down as Play by Play Announcer

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,348
24,741
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
Dan Duva would be a great replacement. Jersey guy, Devils fan as a kid, went to college with him and followed his career every now and then. Could be one of those guys who stays with the team for decades given his age. He does radio for the Golden Knights -

Links:

https://twitter.com/Dan_DUva


The spanish "Gooooooooolll" call is always Epic and never gets old.

Just saying.

It's possible, and I wouldn't hate if he ended up being the guy, I'd just prefer somebody else. I think he's suited better to doing studio stuff like he used to.
yeah me, too but Matt without the Maven would feel empty, you know?

Unless they have Chico do studio analysis with him, which would be very interesting....lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkauron

Jersey Fan 12

Positive Vibes
Nov 20, 2006
6,955
3,011
The optimist in me sees this and thinks the Devils hire a true professional along the lines of Doc or Gary Thorne.

Knowing Harris/Blitzer, this one screams of woke and will be an "historic" they or some other totally unqualified member of an "underrepresented" group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,348
24,741
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
The optimist in me sees this and thinks the Devils hire a true professional along the lines of Doc or Gary Thorne.

Knowing Harris/Blitzer, this one screams of woke and will be an "historic" they or some other totally unqualified member of an "underrepresented" group.
Nah. I think Harris/Blitzer would be too busy with their NFL Team endeavors to try to search for a replacement so they would simply look at who the Devils have at Radio and say "Okay, Matt Laughlin. You're in. Have fun!"
 

Unknown Caller

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
10,293
7,887
The optimist in me sees this and thinks the Devils hire a true professional along the lines of Doc or Gary Thorne.

Knowing Harris/Blitzer, this one screams of woke and will be an "historic" they or some other totally unqualified member of an "underrepresented" group.

They might consult the Devils, but the hire is an MSG call. The Devils aren't the employer of the announcers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and glenwo2

Jersey Fresh

Video Et Taceo
Feb 23, 2004
26,723
9,666
T.A.
He’s not Emrick (who some people weren’t big fans of either, and while this is subjective, those people were sick and wrong) but he was a solid play by play guy. And he was around long enough that people, who have feelings and stuff, are sentimental about him leaving.

I don’t have the greatest faith that his replacement will be as good, much less better. I also know that people hate change so no matter who it is, people will bitch a ton about it. (Hence the requests for ancient familiar voices from the past like Gary Thorne.)

The people who think Matt Loughlin is somehow better are also sick and wrong, there’s a reason he’s been the bench guy since forever. He’s simply worse at it.

And I wouldn’t be surprised if Matt got the job because that seems like the cheapest and easiest solution.

The weak link in the TV broadcasts for me is Dano. I would love Sal to do color commentary instead, but alas, I’m likely stuck with Dano for a very long time.
Sal might be more analytical, but he fumbles over his words as often as Dano does. Our whole crew speaks like they have the mumps. Erika’s interludes make me think she’s competing with a metronome just off camera.

Our whole crew is terribly mediocre.
 

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
The optimist in me sees this and thinks the Devils hire a true professional along the lines of Doc or Gary Thorne.

Knowing Harris/Blitzer, this one screams of woke and will be an "historic" they or some other totally unqualified member of an "underrepresented" group.
1. MSG Networks hires, not Devils ownership.

2. Lol at your assumption of Harris and Blitzer based on absolutely no basis, lmao
 

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,579
19,089
The optimist in me sees this and thinks the Devils hire a true professional along the lines of Doc or Gary Thorne.

Knowing Harris/Blitzer, this one screams of woke and will be an "historic" they or some other totally unqualified member of an "underrepresented" group.

you’re right, they’ll probably hire a guy from a nearby iroquois tribe
 

MachoDiablo

Registered User
Mar 12, 2012
1,355
1,967
Jersey City
The Devils on the YES network next?
It's funny, since when YES was first getting started and YankeeNets was still a thing, the Devils were supposed to be a part of that, since they were under the same ownership group to some degree for a bit.

Honestly, though, depending on how the next year goes I could more readily see SNY going for them, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a Mets fan. SNY is absolutely starved for consistent content beyond the Mets; they get some Jets coverage (little more than a weekly show) and some Big East stuff, but it's all minimal.

As of now, SNY is still largely owned by the Wilpon family, who, while they still owned the Mets, set up a sweetheart deal where the Mets get very, very little money in TV rights fees since SNY basically acted as a glorified Wilponian slush fund. Well, now that the Wilpons have sold the Mets to Steve Cohen, the feeling is that Cohen wants to acquire SNY next: it'd raise his overall bottom line as owner (not that he needs any more pocket change) for a host of reasons. Having another team that provides at least 82 regular games worth of coverage to that network would be a massive boost for it in a tough NYC marketplace.

I've done some cursory glances at the TV deals of the other teams in this area; the Yankees, Nets, NYCFC, and Liberty aren't budging from YES, obviously (Nets owner bought the Liberty recently), the Mets obviously stay on SNY, the Rangers and Knicks are super obviously not leaving MSG. Basically, if any area teams in any of the even remotely major sports are going to change broadcasting platforms it's the Devils, Islanders, or Red Bulls, and the Isles are with MSG for another good lengthy stretch of time, closer to the end of the 2020s (not sure on Red Bulls). I mean, I guess someone could try to woo the United NYC rugby team off MSG, but they're not exactly established yet...side note, I just learned I'm like a 10 minute walk from their field, I might go to their last home game tomorrow if the weather holds up.

So yeah, of all the teams in the area the Devils are the team whose rights are the soonest to come up for bidding/renegotiation, and they're one of the few teams that isn't anchored to one channel or another due to ownership. Harris and Blitzer had wanted to set up their own regional superchannel when they were bidding to own the Mets (would've been Mets, Devils, Sixers, and Steelers) but that obviously fell through. This leaves a few possibilities:

-MSG offers the Devils a ton to stay, since Dolan and company no doubt love cornering the market for NHL games in this region. This is basically what happened the last time the Devils' rights were up.
-The Wilpons remain cheap and don't offer the Devils a lot or get involved in bidding at all. ...I do not miss the Wilpons.
-The Wilpons DO decide to make an offer, since adding the Devils would increase SNY's overall selling value for whenever they give it up.
-Cohen acquires SNY ahead of time and looks to expand its offerings (would be the best chance of the Devils moving to SNY, most likely).

I'm just not too sure about YES getting the Devils unless they really expand into having a full time YES overflow channel, ala MSG with MSG+ and MSG2. You'd likely have a lot of conflicts with the Nets, NYCFC, Liberty, even Manchester City coverage. Not impossible, as I think I've heard of YES using an overflow channel before, but again SNY is in much more dire need of content than YES is at this stage, so I just figure they're in more of a position to try and outbid others. Again, MSG certainly has the motivation to offer a lot and remain this market's one shop for hockey, but we know how lacking the overall team coverage is there.

Random thought: if the Devils do move to a channel like SNY, I'd dig it if the Riveters got some air time, too.
 

Unknown Caller

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
10,293
7,887
It's funny, since when YES was first getting started and YankeeNets was still a thing, the Devils were supposed to be a part of that, since they were under the same ownership group to some degree for a bit.

Honestly, though, depending on how the next year goes I could more readily see SNY going for them, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a Mets fan. SNY is absolutely starved for consistent content beyond the Mets; they get some Jets coverage (little more than a weekly show) and some Big East stuff, but it's all minimal.

As of now, SNY is still largely owned by the Wilpon family, who, while they still owned the Mets, set up a sweetheart deal where the Mets get very, very little money in TV rights fees since SNY basically acted as a glorified Wilponian slush fund. Well, now that the Wilpons have sold the Mets to Steve Cohen, the feeling is that Cohen wants to acquire SNY next: it'd raise his overall bottom line as owner (not that he needs any more pocket change) for a host of reasons. Having another team that provides at least 82 regular games worth of coverage to that network would be a massive boost for it in a tough NYC marketplace.

I've done some cursory glances at the TV deals of the other teams in this area; the Yankees, Nets, NYCFC, and Liberty aren't budging from YES, obviously (Nets owner bought the Liberty recently), the Mets obviously stay on SNY, the Rangers and Knicks are super obviously not leaving MSG. Basically, if any area teams in any of the even remotely major sports are going to change broadcasting platforms it's the Devils, Islanders, or Red Bulls, and the Isles are with MSG for another good lengthy stretch of time, closer to the end of the 2020s (not sure on Red Bulls). I mean, I guess someone could try to woo the United NYC rugby team off MSG, but they're not exactly established yet...side note, I just learned I'm like a 10 minute walk from their field, I might go to their last home game tomorrow if the weather holds up.

So yeah, of all the teams in the area the Devils are the team whose rights are the soonest to come up for bidding/renegotiation, and they're one of the few teams that isn't anchored to one channel or another due to ownership. Harris and Blitzer had wanted to set up their own regional superchannel when they were bidding to own the Mets (would've been Mets, Devils, Sixers, and Steelers) but that obviously fell through. This leaves a few possibilities:

-MSG offers the Devils a ton to stay, since Dolan and company no doubt love cornering the market for NHL games in this region. This is basically what happened the last time the Devils' rights were up.
-The Wilpons remain cheap and don't offer the Devils a lot or get involved in bidding at all. ...I do not miss the Wilpons.
-The Wilpons DO decide to make an offer, since adding the Devils would increase SNY's overall selling value for whenever they give it up.
-Cohen acquires SNY ahead of time and looks to expand its offerings (would be the best chance of the Devils moving to SNY, most likely).

I'm just not too sure about YES getting the Devils unless they really expand into having a full time YES overflow channel, ala MSG with MSG+ and MSG2. You'd likely have a lot of conflicts with the Nets, NYCFC, Liberty, even Manchester City coverage. Not impossible, as I think I've heard of YES using an overflow channel before, but again SNY is in much more dire need of content than YES is at this stage, so I just figure they're in more of a position to try and outbid others. Again, MSG certainly has the motivation to offer a lot and remain this market's one shop for hockey, but we know how lacking the overall team coverage is there.

Random thought: if the Devils do move to a channel like SNY, I'd dig it if the Riveters got some air time, too.

SNY is a dream scenario for the Devils. YES would suck because the channel isn't really available with streaming providers, they're constantly in disputes with regular cable providers, and the Devils would get pushed to the overflow channel a lot with all of the teams that they have. The YES app sucks too.

MSG also isn't available on the majority of streaming services (just Fubo and Directv stream), which is going to progressively become a larger issue as viewers phase out cable and move to streaming. And the feed MSG does provide to Fubo isn't even 720p.

SNY is widely available on streaming services (Hulu, Youtube TV, Fubo, etc.) and they have limited winter programming, which would allow the Devils to consistently be on the primary channel rather than overflow channels. I would think the Devils would also have an expanded opportunity for Devils specific programming, which MSG screws them on.
 

Clam Jensen

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
4,887
8,621
NJ
SNY is a dream scenario for the Devils. YES would suck because the channel isn't really available with streaming providers, they're constantly in disputes with regular cable providers, and the Devils would get pushed to the overflow channel a lot with all of the teams that they have. The YES app sucks too.

MSG also isn't available on the majority of streaming services (just Fubo and Directv stream), which is going to progressively become a larger issue as viewers phase out cable and move to streaming. And the feed MSG does provide to Fubo isn't even 720p.

SNY is widely available on streaming services (Hulu, Youtube TV, Fubo, etc.) and they have limited winter programming, which would allow the Devils to consistently be on the primary channel rather than overflow channels. I would think the Devils would also have an expanded opportunity for Devils specific programming, which MSG screws them on.
I would love SNY since I don’t have YES
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,464
13,284
Connecticut
I may be reading into it but it almost seems like it's not entirely his choice

He said he informed Fitz of his plan a month ago, so that does sound like his choice. But you're right, the last paragraph where he says "I wish that was me calling the goal" makes it sound otherwise.

And the last line makes it sound like they've already picked someone to be the new play by play commentator (and are just waiting to announce it), which is intriguing.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: glenwo2

Andre Palot

Registered User
Oct 20, 2012
8,193
4,783
Dover, NJ
The optimist in me sees this and thinks the Devils hire a true professional along the lines of Doc or Gary Thorne.

Knowing Harris/Blitzer, this one screams of woke and will be an "historic" they or some other totally unqualified member of an "underrepresented" group.
It will probably be either one of the two that did all women's radio broadcast. Kelly Schultz or Erica Ayala.

I'd actually be fine with Kelly. She actually has a background in this stuff and calls hockey games on the collegiate level. She's hardly 'underseasoned' as it were.

But we could just promote Erika and tickle all those boxes and have it still be familiar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nugg

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad