Are you mad at the latest Sara C article then? She reported that this was the case. The offer sheet was a ploy to keep negotiations from going into the season. I only thought we were trenched in for the summer and maybe the start of camp. Sara is saying that we were so set on 7 or 8 years that Aho was generally concerned about another Nylander type situation.
I get that it was the case. I said it was the case. Again, I understand why Aho did what he did. I'm not sure why you continue to miss my point. This is my own tweet from within hours after l'offre hostile hit:
The fact that Aho basically admitted all of this is irrelevant.
My point is that even if the path we were on would have lead to certain death and destruction and certain death and destruction *only*, it was the path *we* chose. And we have every right to choose it.
The offer sheet can only be used as a ploy to keep negotiations from going into the season *if another team offers it*. My problem is not with Aho, and it's not with Dundon/Waddell. It's with Montreal, which gave our player a way to work around our plans -- even if our plans sucked. If Aho was worried about a Nylander situation, didn't want it lasting through the summer, and
*didn't get an offer sheet*, it's possible he'd have caved, and we'd have signed him to a non-bonus-laden, eight-year, $72 million deal by now.
All Montreal did was take away *our* right to negotiate with *our* player.
TOR, COL, TBL, WGP, PHI and others have chosen their path in negotiations with their high-profile RFAs, and to this point, they have been allowed by the rest of the league to stay on that path. It could very well be that at least one of them has chosen their path very poorly. But that is their right, and their choice.
Our path was chosen by Montreal. The fact that it ended up being an OK path doesn't change the fact that it is *not* the path we wanted, and it doesn't necessarily mean it was a *better* path. Like I said, our path could have ended up working out even better for us. But we'll never know.