GDT: Canes at Bolts

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,650
144,090
Bojangles Parking Lot
So going back to this

I actually kind of like the timing for psychological purposes. We're at exactly the 1/4 mark and at this point we can legitimately say the Canes are good. Out of left field, now they'll have a playoff series against the defending champs.

Either they'll rise to the occasion and have one of those "hey guys, we can really make a run this year" moments, or they'll get a harsh reality check. The reality check might not be the worst thing, in the same way that getting buzzsawed by Boston twice wasn't the worst thing for this group's long term development.

And this
Upside for the Canes is they have a chance to start burying the Lightning a bit. One win can make a big difference...

If we win
1. CAR 17 games, 27 points
2. FLA 16 games, 24 points
3. CHI 19 games, 22 points
4. TBL 17 games, 21 points

If we lose
1. CAR 17 games, 25 points
2. FLA 16 games, 24 points
3. TBL 17 games, 23 points
4. CHI 19 games, 22 points

If they can power through and get a tough W, expanding to a 6-point lead instead of a 2-point lead would make a world of difference in a 56-game season.

Test failed. This team is not quite as overwhelmingly good as we hoped they might be, and they won’t be running away from the division contenders. They still have a lot to prove. Time to put the hard hats on and break this losing streak.
 

Rick Davis

Registered User
Dec 31, 2020
3,479
9,299
I’d like to think that the series would have been closer if Mragic were available but even that is debatable. The mark of a great team is one that can win even on nights where the A game is missing which was certainly the case for the Bolts tonight..
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,500
92,985
Jam3s R3im3r

Offense wasn't good enough, and Tampa exploited the same weakness that Boston exposed the last 2 years. We have fundamental flaws that we have not done well enough to resolve. Analytics doesn't help a team that is scared of being bodied.

But yeah, our goalie situation kind of sucks.
 

Joanna

Registered User
Jan 7, 2020
261
308
St. Petersburg
Lightning sitting back and laughing at us. It's the Bruins all over again. We just lose our shit too often to be relied on.

Someday we'll figure it out, I guess.
Lightning are not laughing at you - they are laughing at Goodrow's 2 EN. As a Lightning long time fan, I can tell you that we fans always look forward to playing the Canes because we know it's going to be a good game, no matter who wins. Your team is great and very enjoyable to watch. Good luck as you move on.
 

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
14,069
34,278
Western PA
1000 foot view:

Game 1 - Defensive stalemate
Game 2 - Total domination by Carolina
Game 3 - Domination by Tampa
Game 4 - Total domination by Tampa
Game 5 - Domination by Carolina, just no puck luck

+2 goal differential for Tampa and a 3-2 series lead heading back to Carolina.

A playoff series between these two will be a nailbiter, imo.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
Tampa should show the staff we need more wrinkles in the offense. Tampa packed the defense and the point shots didn’t cause rebounds and the below goal line passes were not as easy with 4 guys that close to the net.

They punished the better offensive players when they could and made them less likely to go to the net and keep them on the outside.

Rod loves playing the game the right way. He needs to adjust his style to what the league allows. If they are allowing cross checking to the nth, then gain your advantage too. Keep the sticks away from the hands and away from the skates. Everything else is fair game.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
We blaming Reimer for playing the 2nd goal exactly as he should with McGinn not doing his job, possibly even deflecting it and even then the puck found the smallest of holes to go in? Interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jstaal

Drivebytrucker

Registered User
Jan 8, 2011
1,238
4,348
Seems alot of the time we lose our goalie plays worse than the other one even if he has a good game. Props to CMAC

When the puck bounces aren't going our way like tonight,. We seem to rush every shot. Just get it on net and hopefully one gets by.

Few times tonight (Brady in front, Nino in the 3rd),. I'd like to see them take that extra half second and pick a corner.
 

chaz4hockey

Old man but still a PP2 Candidate
Sponsor
Jan 21, 2021
8,403
17,883
Naples, FL
It's almost like Tampa knows exactly what we're going to do offensively every time. Well coached players for sure.

Years ago, the Islanders swept an offensive machine in the Oilers (they were still very young) 4 straight by playing tough hard, nosed positional hockey. Gretzky didn’t have a goal in the entire series.

Following year, the Oilers won in 5 despite having lost the last 10 to the Islanders (Oilers to a man said they didn’t realize the sacrifice/what it took to win until they played the 4-straight cup Isles in ‘83 and having also lost to them in ‘81 prelims).

Bolts are an older/experienced team that has been to the mountain. The young Canes are still learning how to win and more importantly the sacrifices that it takes to win against the best.

My only worry is that the Oilers had a Hall of Fame goalie in Grant Fuhr (who stole the first game the following year) whereas our Goaltending is just not Stanley Cup winning material.

btw: Yup, I’m old....
 

hblueridgegal

We'll bounce back
Sep 13, 2019
8,209
29,046
Old North State
Folks don't seem to be buying what RBA is selling tonight, particularly, around his defensive choices. The 8 minutes of Fleury seems kinda strange on a back to back? If Slavin and Dougie don't feel well or optimal, why not give them a night off - not as punishment but as a recuperative measure? On ice performance aside, in interviews, they both come across as a bit disengaged or whatevs. It's very odd to see.
 

Sens1Canes2

Registered User
May 13, 2007
10,694
8,367
Years ago, the Islanders swept an offensive machine in the Oilers (they were still very young) 4 straight by playing tough hard, nosed positional hockey. Gretzky didn’t have a goal in the entire series.

Following year, the Oilers won in 5 despite having lost the last 10 to the Islanders (Oilers to a man said they didn’t realize the sacrifice/what it took to win until they played the 4-straight cup Isles in ‘83 and having also lost to them in ‘81 prelims).

Bolts are an older/experienced team that has been to the mountain. The young Canes are still learning how to win and more importantly the sacrifices that it takes to win against the best.

My only worry is that the Oilers had a Hall of Fame goalie in Grant Fuhr (who stole the first game the following year) whereas our Goaltending is just not Stanley Cup winning material.

btw: Yup, I’m old....
I love that story. Oilers got swept by the Isles, and as they walked out of their room, bodies feeling *ok*, they peeked into the Isles winning dressing room and there were guys keeled over, nursing bruises and generally exhausted.

Canes might get there and they might not. But more often than not, the differences are, the Bruins and Lightning have/had elite goaltending, and they generally play a harder game than the Canes.

I think a healthy Mrazek at least takes a dent out of the first point. The second, I’m not sure what the answer is. It might just be, figuring out how to persevere through those types of series.
 

Peterpuck7810

Registered User
Jan 13, 2021
361
806
The cane's are not quite ready for prime time yet. They still lack that big and ugly defenseman. And need some more snarl... But still young and improving. This was a great test to see where they stand.
 

AD Skinner

Registered User
Mar 18, 2009
13,279
40,882
bubble bath
I still think mcelhinney is a cool dude and am not too salty about this skid. We're 2-3 against the defending champs. If this was a best of 5 series it would've been a bummer but hard fought loss and if it was a best of 7 we'd still be right in it. But it's not and we are putting up decent fights without our starting goalie and one of our best forwards.
 

Cardiac Jerks

Asinine & immoral
Jan 13, 2006
23,555
40,650
Long Sault, Ontario
It’ll be like that Boston/Vancouver final where they alternated kicking each other’s asses.

Hopefully we behave a bit better if we turn out to be Vancouver in this scenario.

riot1.jpg
 

GoCanes2015

Registered User
Oct 14, 2017
768
1,413
As tough a time as Slavin has been having generally, Dougie is the real liability here, followed by Skjei. Dougie has been markedly slower, running away from hits (again), passing poorly (albeit the rest of the team is doing this too). Clearly, he's nursing something, but this Dougie is not the one I would re-sign. Reimer was good, actually really good last night, but not quite good enough. I will say the Bolts seemed to really push the limits on cross-checking as well.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
I get that it is Tampa and it sucks going up against their forward group every night for 4 games in a row but I don't think I have ever been so disenchanted with Slavin's play. Similar to the Boston Playoff series, the effort and energy is just sad to watch. The Canes simply aren't going to be able to compete unless Slavin is 100% engaged.
 

CanesFanBudMan

Borg member
Sponsor
Jun 14, 2016
1,766
7,090
I get that it is Tampa and it sucks going up against their forward group every night for 4 games in a row but I don't think I have ever been so disenchanted with Slavin's play. Similar to the Boston Playoff series, the effort and energy is just sad to watch. The Canes simply aren't going to be able to compete unless Slavin is 100% engaged.
Agree, he has just not looked engaged at all (including before he was out for Covid). He has shown some pop on a couple of offensive rushes, but has been completely flat on defense.

Last year if there was a 50-50 puck in the D zone it was more often than not his and if he had the puck in the D zone you could guarantee a breakout.
 

Peterpuck7810

Registered User
Jan 13, 2021
361
806
As tough a time as Slavin has been having generally, Dougie is the real liability here, followed by Skjei. Dougie has been markedly slower, running away from hits (again), passing poorly (albeit the rest of the team is doing this too). Clearly, he's nursing something, but this Dougie is not the one I would re-sign. Reimer was good, actually really good last night, but not quite good enough. I will say the Bolts seemed to really push the limits on cross-checking as well.

I agree, this version of Hamilton can be let go. I'd rather see Bean get those minutes and sign a rugged brusier for a replacement.. one that chews up forwards and spits them out just for fun....
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad